Art. 65 RDSt Regolamento dei dipendenti dello Stato (RDSt)

33.2023.33 · ti (Art. 65 cpv. 1 LTF)

Claimant Ordered to Reimburse Benefits Due to Undisclosed Cohabitation

This provision is implied for the disposition ordering that no judicial fee is charged, which generally falls under cost provisions.

42.2019.26 · ti (art. 65 LTF)

Social Welfare Reimbursement for Pension Withdrawal

Although not explicitly cited in the numbered orders, the text refers to cost assessment rules (which usually involve LTF articles like 65/66) in the context of the decision outcome, but since the dispositive only mentions the rejection of the appeal and costs being charged to the State, no explicit cost article from LTF appears in the final orders 1, 2, 3.

52.2018.574 · ti (Art. 65 cpv. 1 LTF)

Appeal Against Rectification of Building Permit Decision Regarding Shadow Immissions

This article is mentioned in the reasoning (consid. 1) for active legitimacy, but it is NOT explicitly cited in the dispositive orders (1, 2, 3).

38.2010.57 · ti (art. 65 seg. LTF)

Unemployment Insurance Funding Denial for Vocational Training Appeal

Cited regarding the procedure for the appeal to the Federal Tribunal, noting the procedure is burdensome.

52.2007.345 · ti (art. 65 LTF)

Construction Permit Reinstatement Subject to Roof Modification

Cited in the final disposition preamble, referring to the possibility of appeal to the Federal Tribunal (although the reference in the text is likely a typographical error for Art. 65 PAmm based on context, it is listed as LTF in the disposition's reference list).

52.2007.159 · ti (Art. 65 LTF)

Municipality Permit Suspension Prior to Procedural Compliance

This article is cited in order 3 as the basis for admissibility of the appeal to the Federal Tribunal in public law matters.

52.2006.265 · ti (Art. 65 LTF)

Owner v. Municipality: Building Permit Suspension Due to Delayed Planning Safeguard

Cited regarding the imposition of court costs (tassa di giustizia) on the appellant based on their degree of success.

52.2002.244 · ti (art. 65 al. 1 LTF)

Consortium Appeal of Highway Maintenance Contract Award Based on Bid Non-Conformity

This reference appears to be a typo in the text, as the context suggests the rule for costs in administrative law (which is usually regulated by cantonal law, CIAP/PAmm here), but the dispositive explicitly states no costs are awarded in point 2, making the inclusion of cost-related articles relevant if they were cited for that purpose. However, the preceding articles listed (CIAP/PAmm) govern the decision on the merits. Since point 2 states no costs/fees are awarded, and no specific cost article from LTF is cited in the dispositive, this entry is excluded based on the rule set. If the list of cited laws before the dispositive were the dispositive, all would be included. Based strictly on inclusion/exclusion rules (cited in the numbered orders), only items in orders 1 and 2 count.

11.2012.57 · ti (Art. 65 cpv. 1 LTF)

Custody Modification Appeal Following Parental Relocation

This provision is implicitly cited in the final order regarding legal aid/costs assessment principles (though Art. 64 LTF is more common for legal aid, Art. 65 LTF governs the federal court's discretion regarding legal fees in its own proceedings, which aligns with the detailed assessment of indemnity found in the reasoning leading up to the order).

11.2017.10 · ti (Art. 65 Costi LTF)

Artisan Collective Hypothec Registration Dispute and Moot Appeal Costs Assessment

Cited in the reasoning concerning the application of federal appeal deadlines.

11.2023.131 · ti (Art. 65 cpv. 2 LTF)

Wife's Garnishment Request for Maintenance Denied Due to Offset by Family Allowance

This provision, which governs the suspension of appeal deadlines during judicial holidays, is mentioned in the final section describing legal remedies, but it is not cited in the dispositive orders (1-3). (Exclusion based on rule).

33.2011.15 · ti (Art. 65 LTF)

Cantonal Compensation Fund Not Liable for Denial of Justice in Benefit Calculation Delay

Not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders 1, 2, 3.

35.2005.74 · ti (Art. 65 cpv. 1 LTF)

Insured Denied Benefits Appeals Transfer

This provision is not explicitly present in the dispositive.

35.2018.70 · ti (Art. 65 LTF)

Insurer Benefits Cessation Over Workplace Accident Trauma Causation

This article relates to court costs (spese), which were explicitly addressed, though the application is vague ('le spese sono poste a carico dello Stato').

35.2020.4 · ti (art. 65 cpv. 1 LTF)

Insured v. Insurer: Cataract Causality Following Bicycle Accident

Although not explicitly cited as 'Art. 65 cpv. 1 LTF' in the dispositive, the reference to 'ricorso in materia di diritto pubblico' in point 3 implies the procedure for appealing to the Federal Tribunal under the Federal Administrative Procedure Act (LTF/BGG).