173.110
RDST
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 6 RDSt Regolamento dei dipendenti dello Stato (RDSt)
RDSt
Art. 6 RDSt
1 Il bando di concorso definisce le condizioni di partecipazione e di assunzione, le modalità di presentazione della candidatura e i documenti richiesti.
2 Quando il bando stabilisce la presentazione della candidatura in forma elettronica, la stessa va sottoposta tramite l’apposito sistema informatico.
3 Le autocertificazioni richieste dai servizi centrali del personale devono essere firmate in originale; possono essere trasmesse dal candidato, in forma elettronica, sotto forma di scansione oppure immagine.
4 I servizi centrali possono richiedere in ogni tempo la presentazione dei documenti originali, che in tal caso saranno restituiti al concorrente.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (13)
32.2022.10 · ti (art. 6 cpv. 1 LTF)
Denial of Disability Benefits Upheld Based on Medical Assessments
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the right to appeal to the Federal Court.
35.2015.129 · ti (Art. 6 cpv. 1 LTF)
Claimant v. Insurance Provider (Accident Benefits Suspension)
Impliedly cited as the basis for the jurisdiction allowing the appeal to the Federal Tribunal mentioned in order 3.
72.2012.100 · ti (Art. 6 LTF)
Pharmacist Fraud and Controlled Substance Offenses Conviction
Not cited in the dispositive.
52.2007.389 · ti (art. 6 LTF)
Barn-to-Residence Conversion Denial Upheld
This procedural rule regarding the right to appeal to the Federal Tribunal is cited in order No. 3.
41.1998.4 · ti (Art. 6 LTF)
Widow's Appeal for Survivor's Pension Revision Denied Due to Failure to Exhaust Remedies
Cited in the reasoning related to the costs imposed on the state due to the decision.
30.2012.30 · ti (Art. 6 LTF)
Assured Challenges AVS Contribution Assessment Based on Pension Income and Indigence Claim
Provision governing the right to appeal to the Federal Tribunal, cited in the notification of appeal rights.
32.2002.14 · ti (art. 6 LTF)
Insurance Repayment Waiver Due to Severe Hardship Finding
This provision mandates that the costs are borne by the State.
32.2006.79 · ti (art. 6 art. 66 al. 1 LTF)
Painter-Decorator Disability Benefits Appeal (36% Invalidity)
The second order dictates that court costs ('spese') are to be borne by the State, referencing the relevant provision for court costs.
32.2010.107 · ti (Art. 6 cpv. 1 LTF)
Insured v. Disability Office: Reinstatement of Full Disability Pension Due to Insufficient Evidence of Psychiatric Improvement
Cited in the final order regarding the possibility to challenge the decision before the Federal Supreme Court.
35.2024.72 · ti (Art. 6 LTF)
Insurer Upheld in Terminating Hockey-Related Injury Benefits Due to Pre-Existing Degeneration
Cited in the final order about appealing the decision to the Federal Tribunal.
36.2009.24 · ti (Art. 6 cpv. 1 LTF)
Italian Cross-Border Worker v. Swiss Mandatory Health Insurance Affiliation
Cited in the final order concerning the procedural rule for appealing to the Federal Tribunal (implied by context of point 3, though the full reference in point 3 refers to the appeal itself).
52.2004.398 · ti (Art. 6, comma 666666 LTF)
Telephony Antenna Installation Permit Upheld Against Municipal and Neighbor Objections
This reference is likely a typo in the original decision's citation list (it appears as '...dichiarati e pronunciati:', followed by citations ending in '2.' and '3.' which concern costs). If this were a proper BGer decision, cost provisions like Art. 66 LTF would be included here. In this cantonal decision, the references for costs are implied by points 2 and 3 concerning the imposition of the judicial fee and indemnities.
60.2009.470 · ti (art. 6 66 al. 1 LTF)
Cantonal Chamber Grants Transmission of Criminal Records for Use in Related Civil Matter
Although the text does not explicitly contain 'Art. 66 al. 1 LTF' in the dispositive, it cites 'art. 39 lit. f LTG' regarding costs, which is the relevant procedural basis for costs in this specific Cantonal context, and the dispositive explicitly addresses costs (Point 2). Assuming 'art. 39 lit. f LTG' is the Cantonal cost allocation rule analogous to the Federal standard cited in similar contexts, it is included based on the explicit text.