Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
173.110 RDST CH-TI

Art. 48 RDSt Regolamento dei dipendenti dello Stato (RDSt)

RDSt
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (77 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 48 RDSt

1 Ai docenti di scuola elementare e media per l’assistenza alla refezione degli allievi è riconosciuto, oltre al pasto gratuito, un supplemento di stipendio di 16 franchi all’ora. [27]

2 Ai docenti di scuola speciale per l’assistenza alla refezione degli allievi è riconosciuto, oltre al pasto gratuito, un supplemento di stipendio di 16 franchi all’ora se gli allievi godono di sufficiente autonomia e di 45 franchi all’ora nel caso opposto. La definizione del grado di autonomia è affidata al servizio competente. [28]

3 Lo stipendio di 16 franchi all’ora può essere riconosciuto anche a terze persone (sorveglianti) chiamate ad assistere gli allievi durante le pause pranzo del mezzogiorno; per l’assistenza agli allievi delle scuole speciali lo stipendio che può essere riconosciuto è di 27.50 franchi all’ora . [29]

[27] Cpv. modificato dal R 22.8.2018; in vigore dal 1.9.2018 - BU 2018, 330.

[28] Cpv. introdotto dal R 22.8.2018; in vigore dal 1.9.2018 - BU 2018, 330.

[29] Cpv. modificato dal R 24.9.2025; in vigore dal 26.9.2025 - BU 2025, 201; precedente modifica: BU 2020, 230.

← Art. 47 RDSt Regolamento dei dipendenti dello Stato (RDSt) Art. 49 RDSt →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (13)

60.2024.249 · ti (art. 48 cpv. 1 LTF)
Prosecution Separation Upheld Over Appellant's Objection
Cited in the section regarding the delivery method for written acts to the Federal Supreme Court.
60.2022.361 · ti (art. 48 cpv. 1 LTF)
Review of Dismissal in Defamation Case Over Archival Material Provenance
Cited to specify the required method of delivering written acts to the Federal Tribunal.
60.2016.237 · ti (art. 48 cpv. 1 LTF)
Appeal Dismissed for Insufficient Substantiation of Compensation Claims Following Abandoned Prosecution
Cited as part of the instruction regarding the deadline for submitting appeal documents to the Federal Supreme Court.
38.2012.42 · ti (art. 48 cpv. 3 LTF)
Unemployment Benefit Suspension Appeal Jurisdiction
Cited in the reasoning regarding the general principle of the duty to transmit files to the competent authority, which underpins the procedural orders.
14.2018.133 · ti (art. 48 LTF)
Appeal Against Provisional Debt Rejection Based on Acknowledgment of Debt; Right to Be Heard Violation Addressed on Merits
Mentioned in the section on remedies available before the Federal Tribunal, which suggests the applicability of this provision regarding the scope of federal review, although it is ultimately in the 'Rimedi giuridici' section.
14.2020.113 · ti (art. 48 LTF)
Provisional Debt Collection Lifting Denied Due to Unsigned Debt Acknowledgment Not Directly Binding Debtor Corporation
Not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders (1, 2, 3). It is only mentioned in the final section on remedies (Rimedi giuridici) regarding the possibility of filing an appeal, but not applied in the ruling itself.
14.2023.3 · ti (Art. 48 LTF)
Social Security Fund Debt Collection Opposition Appeal Ruling on Inadmissibility of Installment Request
Cited in the final orders, although the dispositive itself cites only the outcome (inadmissibility), not the procedural ground for the decision (which relates to inadmissibility based on the merits of the claim, not a specific procedural article for declaration of inadmissibility found in the dispositive). However, since the text mentions 'Art. 112 cpv. 1 lett. d LTF' and 'art. 74 cpv. 1 lett. b LTF' relating to federal appeals, and the outcome of point 1 is 'reclamo è irricevibile', if a relevant procedural article applied by the Tribunal *in the dispositive* was available, it would be included. Here, no article justifying the inadmissibility (like Art. 93 LTF) is explicitly cited in point 1. Therefore, only cost and federal appeal notice provisions are extracted.
38.2012.42 · ti (Art. 48 cpv. 3 LTF)
Cantonal Insurance Court on Admissibility of Appeal Against Unemployment Benefit Suspension Without Prior Opposition
Cited in the reasoning as a federal procedural provision supporting the duty of transmission, although the final orders do not explicitly reference it as the basis for the outcome.
60.2015.270 · ti (art. 48 cpv. 1 LTF)
Failure to Rectify Unsigned Opposition Renders Appeal Inadmissible
Cited in the instructions for further appeal (remedy), specifying how written submissions must be delivered to the Federal Tribunal.
60.2016.237 · ti (art. 48 cpv. 1 LTF)
Claimant's Appeal for Legal Fees and Moral Damages Following Dismissal of Criminal Proceedings Deemed Inadmissible
Cited in the operative part (Point 3) to define the deadline and method for submitting written acts to the Federal Tribunal.
60.2022.251 · ti (Art. 48 cpv. 1 LTF)
Appeal of Dismissal of Fraud and Embezzlement Complaint Following Company Share Purchase
This article is cited regarding the method and deadline for submitting written submissions to the Federal Tribunal.
60.2024.2 · ti (Art. 48 cpv. 1 LTF)
Reopening of Defamation Investigation Over Archival Document Accusations
Cited regarding the physical delivery requirement for written submissions to the Federal Tribunal.
60.2024.221 · ti (art. 48 cpv. 1 LTF)
Appellate Court Rules Penal Order Opposition Timely Due to Notice Omission
Cited in the third point of the final orders defining the rule for submitting written acts to the Federal Tribunal within the deadline.