173.110 RDST

CH-TI

Art. 32 RDSt Regolamento dei dipendenti dello Stato (RDSt)

RDSt

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (77 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 32 RDSt

1 Per gli impiegati i congedi per affari o per formazione sindacale riconosciuti sono concessi nel seguente modo

a) per i membri di comitato fino a 12 giorni all’anno;

b) per gli affiliati ordinari fino a 5 giorni all’anno.

2 Per i docenti i congedi per affari o per formazione sindacale riconosciuti sono concessi nel seguente modo

a) per i membri di comitato: fino a 12 giorni all’anno se non vi è cumulo dei giorni di congedo. Se vi è cumulo dei giorni di congedo, fino ad un massimo del 20% di un’unità a tempo pieno attribuibile annualmente ad una persona per sindacato; la percentuale viene stabilita in base al numero di affiliati docenti cantonali e comunali attivi il 1° marzo dell’anno che precede l’anno scolastico per il quale è chiesto il congedo;

b) per gli affiliati ordinari fino a 2 giorni all’anno.

← Art. 31 RDSt Regolamento dei dipendenti dello Stato (RDSt) Art. 33 RDSt →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (7)

32.2023.129 · ti (art. 32 cpv. 2 e 48 cpv. 3 LTF)

Review Application Regarding Disability Benefits Following Federal Supreme Court Confirmation

Cited as a federal procedural provision governing the obligation to transmit the case file to the competent authority (the Federal Supreme Court).

31.2023.7 · ti (Art. 32 cpv. 2 e 48 cpv. 3 LTF)

Revision of Social Security Liability Denied Due to Prior Final Judgment

Cited as federal procedural provisions imposing the duty of the court to transmit the file to the competent authority, relevant to the decision to transmit the file to the Federal Supreme Court.

32.2000.106 · ti (art. 32 cpv. 2 lett. a LTF)

Appeal Regarding Half-Pension for Invalidity—Jurisdiction Over Foreign Resident

This provision is implicitly referenced by the instruction to appeal to the Federal Tribunal against the finding of non-competence, even though the specific reference might be standard for appeal to the TF against cantonal decisions (but is not explicitly cited in the dispositive of the current cantonal decision).

32.2007.227 · ti (Art. 32 cpv. 1 LTF)

Insurance Court Remands Disability Denial for Further Psychiatric Clarification

Provision cited in the final order paragraph 3 regarding the possibility to challenge the decision via an appeal in matters of public law to the Federal Supreme Court (LTF is Bundesgerichtsgesetz, BGG in German, although the text cites LTF which is typically the law for the Cantonal Court, but the context indicates appeal to the Federal Tribunal, suggesting a slight abbreviation/mismatch, but including it as it is explicitly cited for appeal rights).

32.2023.129 · ti (Art. 32 cpv. 2 e 48 cpv. 3 LTF)

Application for Revision of Cantonal Insurance Court Judgment Inadmissible Due to Prior Federal Supreme Court Ruling

Procedural basis cited (implicitly via general principles derived from federal provisions) for the obligation to transmit the file to the competent Federal Tribunal.

36.2002.8 · ti (art. 32 LTF)

Insurance Premium Subsidy Denial Based on Gross Income Calculation

Cited by the IAS in their decision of 20 December 2001 as a basis for the decision that was subject to appeal.

72.2006.120 · ti (art. 11, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 49, 51, 52, 53, 54, 56, 57, 60, 61, 62, 65, 66 LTF)

Fraud, Drug Offenses, and Related Crimes Trial

These are procedural articles mentioned in the list of applicable laws via the general reference to the CPP (Code of Criminal Procedure), and are not explicitly numbered in the dispositive as having been applied for an order (like inadmissibility or decision on costs/legal aid according to LTF rules, which is not the case here, the cost allocation is referred to TG art. 39).