173.110 RDST

CH-TI

Art. 28 RDSt Regolamento dei dipendenti dello Stato (RDSt)

RDSt

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (77 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 28 RDSt

1 Per gli impiegati la data e la durata delle vacanze, entro i limiti previsti dall’art. 41 LORD, devono essere preventivamente autorizzate dal funzionario dirigente tenuto conto delle esigenze di servizio e dei desideri dell’interessato.

2 Le vacanze non possono essere compensate in denaro riservati i casi di cessazione del rapporto d’impiego ove, per esigenze di servizio, le vacanze maturate e non ancora estinte, non hanno potuto essere godute. [13]

3 La riduzione delle vacanze nei casi previsti dall’art. 43 LORD avviene, nella misura in cui non vi è colpa del dipendente, sul diritto dell’anno in cui si è verificato l’evento che comporta la riduzione. Nel caso in cui il dipendente, per sua colpa o negligenza, abbia superato il limite dei giorni di vacanza di diritto previsto dall’art. 41 LORD, la compensazione avviene entro l’anno successivo con corrispondente riduzione del nuovo diritto. [14]

4 … [15]

5 Nel caso di sospensione dalla funzione il dipendente non matura il diritto alle vacanze.

[13] Cpv. modificato dal R 2.12.2020; in vigore dal 4.12.2020 - BU 2020, 377.

[14] Cpv. modificato dal R 2.12.2020; in vigore dal 4.12.2020 - BU 2020, 377.

[15] Cpv. abrogato dal R 2.12.2020; in vigore dal 4.12.2020 - BU 2020, 377.

← Art. 27 RDSt Regolamento dei dipendenti dello Stato (RDSt) Art. 29 RDSt →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (11)

52.2010.34 · ti (art. 28 LTF)

EOC Vending Machine Concession Award Annulled for Flawed Tendering

Cited as the procedural basis for the appeal to the Federal Tribunal.

90.2006.48 · ti (art. 28 LTF)

Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Service Road Route Approval

Cited in the final orders, indicating that no court fee is charged (Art. 28 LPamm is the Cantonal equivalent mentioned in the reasoning, but the dispositive lists LTF articles for appeal rights).

32.2004.5 · ti (art. 28 c cpv. 2 LTF)

Insured Person v. AI Office (Dispute over Invalidity Pension Level)

This article governs the appeal to the Federal Tribunal, which is referenced in order 3 concerning the next procedural recourse.

52.2006.178 · ti (art. 28 LTF)

Construction Company Unit Price Omission in Public Tender Exclusion Upheld

Though TF is mentioned in the text (*LTF* is not cited, *PAmm* is cited), the decision is from the Cantonal Administrative Court. Based on the explicit citation in the final section: 'visti gli art. ... 28 ... PAmm', I include the administrative procedural law article.

52.2008.104 · ti (art. 28 LTF)

Cantonal Tribunal Voids Building Permit Due to Unverified Wastewater Disposal Method

Cited in the final dispositions regarding the possibility of appealing to the Federal Supreme Court (LTF).

52.2008.199 · ti (art. 28 LTF)

Judicial Review of Warehouse Permit Denial Based on Superseding Zoning Plan

Cited in the list of provisions considered for the decision (though this is likely a typo in the original dispositive referring to cantonal procedural law, given the context as it seems misplaced among the LTF articles).

52.2008.199 · ti (art. 28 LTF)

Judicial Review of Warehouse Permit Denial Based on Superseding Zoning Plan

Cited in the list of provisions considered for the decision.

52.2010.171 · ti (art. 28 LTF)

Cantonal Administrative Tribunal Overturns Construction Permit Due to Procedural and Substantive Defects

Cited for the right to appeal to the Federal Supreme Court within 30 days (governing the appeal procedure to the next instance).

72.2006.120 · ti (art. 11, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 49, 51, 52, 53, 54, 56, 57, 60, 61, 62, 65, 66 LTF)

Fraud, Drug Offenses, and Related Crimes Trial

These are procedural articles mentioned in the list of applicable laws via the general reference to the CPP (Code of Criminal Procedure), and are not explicitly numbered in the dispositive as having been applied for an order (like inadmissibility or decision on costs/legal aid according to LTF rules, which is not the case here, the cost allocation is referred to TG art. 39).

90.2006.48 · ti (art. 28 LTF)

Cantonal Court Annuls Municipal Road Alignment for Lack of Public Interest Justification

Cited in the dispositive (Order 4) to specify the deadline and basis for appealing the decision to the Federal Tribunal in matters of public law.

90.2007.48 · ti (art. 28 LTF)

Municipality v. State Council on Zoning Plan Revision and Building Zone Expansion Compliance

Cited in the reasoning for cost forfeiture, but only the procedural article in paragraph 6 refers to Art. 28 LPamm. The procedural provisions cited in the dispositive are from the LTF.