Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
173.110 RDST CH-TI

Art. 2 RDSt Regolamento dei dipendenti dello Stato (RDSt)

RDSt
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (77 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 2 RDSt

1 Sono servizi centrali per la gestione del personale ai sensi di questo regolamento

a) per gli impiegati secondo l’art. 1 cpv. 1 lett. a) LORD: la Sezione delle risorse umane del Dipartimento delle finanze e dell’economia;

b) per i docenti cantonali secondo l’art. 1 cpv. 1 lett. b) LORD: la Sezione amministrativa del Dipartimento dell’educazione, della cultura e dello sport;

c) per i dipendenti dell’Istituto delle assicurazioni sociali (di seguito IAS): la relativa direzione.

2 Ai servizi centrali compete la formulazione di proposte relative alla politica generale del personale, la consulenza e il supporto ai funzionari dirigenti nonché il controllo in generale dell’applicazione delle norme.

3 In caso di mancato rispetto delle norme del diritto del personale da parte dei funzionari dirigenti, ai servizi centrali è data la competenza di effettuare una segnalazione al rispettivo funzionario dirigente superiore.

4 La sezione delle scuole comunali [3] del Dipartimento dell’educazione, della cultura e dello sport, nell’ambito della gestione del personale docente comunale, svolge un ruolo di coordinamento e di consulenza secondo le leggi specifiche.

[3] Denominazione dell’unità amministrativa adattata d’ufficio il 21.12.2019; in vigore dal 1.1.2018 - BU 2017, 462.

← Art. 1 RDSt Regolamento dei dipendenti dello Stato (RDSt) Art. 3 RDSt →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (52)

15.2022.131 · ti (art. 2 LTF)
Appeal Regarding Enforcement Office Accounting After Partial Success in Challenging Child Support Curator Fees
Cited in the legal provision regarding the term for filing an appeal to the Federal Tribunal.
35.2022.26 · ti (Art. 2 comma 2 lett. a LTF)
Disability Pension Calculation and IMI Claim After Multiple Work Accidents
The implied basis for filing the appeal to the Federal Supreme Court (mentioned in the final order regarding the recourse option).
35.2021.51 · ti (Art. 2 della Legge sul Tribunale federale (LTF))
Worker's Appeal for Leg Injury Denied as Not Meeting Accident Definition
Cited implicitly in the final order (Point 3) as the basis for the right to appeal to the Federal Tribunal ('ricorso in materia di diritto pubblico').
13.2019.87 · ti (Art. 2, art. 116 LTF)
Appeal Against Reduction of Legal Aid Fees Lacking Justification
These articles are mentioned in the 'Rimedi giuridici' section (potential grounds for appeal to the Federal Tribunal), but are not cited in the operative part (orders 1, 2, 3).
35.2018.64 · ti (Art. 2 cpv. 1 LTF)
Insurer IMI Assessment Upheld Despite Unconsidered Pension Appeal
This article is implicitly referenced by Order 3, which allows appeal to the Federal Tribunal in matters of public law, consistent with LTF jurisdiction.
35.2016.35 · ti (§ 2. art. 66 cpv. 1 LTF)
Insured Party v. Insurer: Appeal of Benefit Termination Based on Insufficient Medical Report
The court cited a procedural rule regarding costs in the context of the appeal outcome (though the article is not explicitly written as 'Art. 66 al. 1 LTF' in the dispositive, the instruction requires inclusion if costs are addressed. However, since the text lists '2. Non si percepisce tassa di giustizia, mentre le spese sono poste a carico dello Stato,' and then the next point addresses costs to the opposing party, the actual explicit reference is missing or implied by the general cost ruling. I will adhere strictly to what is explicitly written in the final numbered orders.
36.2014.8 · ti (Art. 2 comma 2 LTF)
Insured Person v. Compensation Fund (2013 Premium Reduction Calculation)
Cited in the reasoning regarding the grounds for appeal to the Federal Tribunal, but not explicitly cited in the final orders.
35.2012.4 · ti (Art. 2 cpv. 2 LTF)
Insurance Denial Appeal for Psychological Impairment Following Hand Amputation
Although not explicitly cited in the final orders, the procedural context of the appeal to the Federal Tribunal suggests a basis for jurisdiction/procedure.
36.2011.81 · ti (Art. 2.2.2 BGG)
Insured Denied Continued Disability Benefits Despite Incapacity for Prior Work
Referenced in the reasoning section concerning the role of the IV office in administrative proceedings.
30.2009.45 · ti (art. 2 cpv. 2 LTF)
Insured Worker v. Company Reclassification of Independent Contractor Status
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the requirements for challenging a decision before the Federal Tribunal.
36.2009.34 · ti (Art. 2 cpv. 2 LTF)
Cross-Border Worker Health Insurance Enrollment Obligation Confirmation
This article is not explicitly cited in the final orders. The disposition only contains orders 1, 2, and 3, which do not cite specific procedural grounds from LTF for the dismissal itself (only costs).
11.2006.130 · ti (art. 72 cpv, 2 lett. b. n. 7 LTF)
Mother's Appeal Denied in Custody Deprivation Over Untreated Mental Illness
Cited to confirm the admissibility of appeal in civil matters regarding child protection regardless of the value in dispute.
11.2006.104 · ti (art. 72 cpv, 2 lett. b. n. 7 LTF)
Appeal on Provisional Custody Deprivation and Legal Aid Declared Moot by Definitive Ruling
Cited to confirm the admissibility of the civil appeal to the Federal Tribunal in child protection cases without regard to value.
52.2006.299 · ti (art. 2 LTF)
Municipal Denial of Large Illuminated Advertising Screen Upheld
This provision is cited in the final decision's preamble.
52.2005.390 · ti (Art. 2 Art. 66 LTF)
Appellant v. Municipality: Prohibition of Habitation Due to Void Permit and Lack of Occupancy Permit
Although not explicitly listed in the final dispositive orders (1. and 2.), the costs provision is cited in the preamble to the orders (the list of articles considered before the declaration), and the costs are explicitly imposed in order 2.