Art. 4 LPAmm Legge sulla procedura amministrativa (LPAmm)

52.2024.120 · ti (art. 4 LPAmm)

Administrative Court Annuls Construction Contract Award Based on Invalid Reference Project Score

Cited in section 1.1 to establish the Tribunal's competence.

42.2024.16 · ti (art. 4 cpv. 1 LPamm)

Recourse Against Municipality for Social Assistance Delay Inadmissible Due to Improper Jurisdiction

Cited in the context of transmitting the file for lack of material competence regarding the municipal social aid aspect.

38.2020.68 · ti (art. 4 cpv. 1 Lpamm)

Unemployment Benefits Suspension Appeal Inadmissible Due to Procedural Errors and Wrong Jurisdiction

Cited as part of the cantonal procedural provisions justifying the obligation to transmit the file to the competent authority (applicable via art. 31 Lptca).

90.2010.253 · ti (art. 4 cpv. 1 LPamm)

Appeal Against Cantonal Landscape Plan Inadmissible Due to Misdirected Challenge to Municipal Property Classification

Applied because the appeal was deemed inadmissible and the case file was transmitted to the competent Municipal authority.

38.2019.21 · ti (art. 4 cpv. 1 Lpamm)

Unemployment Insurance Appeal Over Incorrect Remedy Advice

Cited in the reasoning section as cantonal procedural law supporting the transmission of the file.

42.2016.31 · ti (art. 4 cpv. 1 LPamm)

Dispute Over Funeral Expense Reimbursement Jurisdiction

Cited in the reasoning process to justify the transfer of the case to the Council of State based on competence.

42.2016.31 · ti (art. 4 cpv. 1 LPamm applicabile in virtù del rinvio di cui all’art. 31 Lptca)

Dispute Over Funeral Expense Reimbursement Jurisdiction

Used to justify the transfer of the case records to the Council of State due to lack of jurisdiction (competence).

52.2012.330 · ti (art. 4 cpv. 3 LPamm)

Employer v. State Council (Employment Termination Jurisdiction)

Cited in the reasoning regarding prior consultation with the CPC.

38.2012.66 · ti (Art. 4 cpv. 1 Lpamm)

Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Unemployment Benefit Documentation

Cited as applicable cantonal procedural provision supporting the general obligation of the court to transmit files.

38.2013.27 · ti (art. 4 cpv. 1 Lpamm)

Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Interest Regarding Corrected Suspension, Unaddressed Claim Remanded.

Cited as part of the procedural provisions supporting the obligation of the TCA to transmit the case file to the competent authority (applicable via art. 31 Lptca).

42.2013.8 · ti (Art. 4 LPamm)

Appeal Admissibility Regarding Extraordinary Unemployment Benefits Repayment

Mandates that an incompetent authority shall transmit the case to the competent authority.

90.2011.116 · ti (Art. 4 cpv. 1 LPamm)

Property Owner v. Municipality Zoning Plan Approval (Inadmissibility and Transfer)

The case was transmitted to the State Council for decision as the appeal was declared inadmissible.

38.2012.42 · ti (art. 4 cpv. 1 Lpamm)

Unemployment Benefit Suspension Appeal Jurisdiction

Cited in the reasoning regarding the general principle of the duty to transmit files to the competent authority, which underpins the procedural orders.

35.2011.50 · ti (art. 4 cpv.1 Lpamm)

Heirs v. Accident Insurer: Procedural Error on Remand of Survivor Benefits Claim

Cited in the reasoning related to the transmission of the case file, although the core basis for the transmission/handling of the case is derived from LPGA provisions applied above.

35.2011.79 · ti (Art. 4 cpv. 1 Lpamm)

Insured vs. Insurance Tribunal: Jurisdiction over Private Accident Insurance

Applied as an incompetent authority to transfer the case files to the competent authority.