956.1
GEBGLAB
CH-TG
CH-TG
§ 35 Gesetz über die Gebäudeversicherung (Gebäudeversicherungsgesetz, GebG) - Rettungspflicht
Verfahren im Schadenfall
§ 35 Gebäudeversicherungsgesetz, GebG · Rettungspflicht
1. Der Eigentümer ist verpflichtet, nach Eintritt eines Schadenereignisses für die Minderung des Schadens zu sorgen.
2. Verletzt er diese Pflicht schuldhaft, so ist die Gebäudeversicherung berechtigt, die Entschädigung entsprechend zu kürzen.
3. Die Gebäudeversicherung hat dem Eigentümer die zur Schadenminderung nicht offensichtlich unzweckmässig aufgewendeten Kosten auch dann zu vergüten, wenn die getroffenen Massnahmen erfolglos waren.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (22)
B-5862/2024 (Art. 35 FINMAG)
Bank fined for anti-money laundering violations, but penalties overturned on appeal.
Used as the legal basis for the withdrawal of profits.
B-5507/2024 (Art. 35 Abs. 1 FINMAG)
Securities Firm Regulation Violation and Profit Confiscation
Provides the legal basis for FINMA to confiscate profits made through serious breaches of supervisory law.
B-5507/2024 (Art. 35 Abs. 2 FINMAG)
Securities Firm Regulation Violation and Profit Confiscation
Extends the confiscation provision to cases where a loss has been avoided through serious breaches of supervisory law.
B-5507/2024 (Art. 35 Abs. 3 FINMAG)
Securities Firm Regulation Violation and Profit Confiscation
Allows FINMA to estimate the amount to be confiscated if it cannot be determined without disproportionate effort.
B-5507/2024 (Art. 35 Abs. 4 FINMAG)
Securities Firm Regulation Violation and Profit Confiscation
Sets a seven-year statute of limitations for the right of confiscation.
B-5507/2024 (Art. 35 Abs. 5 FINMAG)
Securities Firm Regulation Violation and Profit Confiscation
States that criminal confiscation takes precedence over administrative confiscation.
B-480/2022 (Art. 35 Abs. 1 FINMAG)
Financial Services Firm Faces Sanctions for Supervisory Lapses and Conflicts of Interest
Cited as the legal basis for the confiscation of profits obtained through serious violations of supervisory law.
B-664/2020 (Art. 35 Abs. 1 FINMAG)
Federal Administrative Court Partially Overturns FINMA Sanctions in Insider Trading Case
Allows FINMA to confiscate profits earned through serious violations of supervisory law.
B-664/2020 (Art. 35 Abs. 4 FINMAG)
Federal Administrative Court Partially Overturns FINMA Sanctions in Insider Trading Case
Sets the limitation period for confiscation at seven years from the violation of supervisory provisions.
B-664/2020 (Art. 35 FINMAG)
Federal Administrative Court Partially Overturns FINMA Sanctions in Insider Trading Case
Basis for confiscating profits earned through serious violations of supervisory law.
B-1576/2019 (Art. 35 Abs. 1 FINMAG)
Former Bank CEO's Ban Upheld, Forfeiture Overturned
Cited as the legal basis for the confiscation order against the appellant.
B-5668/2017 (Art. 35 LFINMA)
Financial Regulator's Confiscation Upheld Against Wealth Management Firm for Serious Violations
Utilisé pour prononcer la confiscation d'un gain acquis en violation grave du droit de la surveillance.
B-4757/2017 (Art. 35 Abs. 1 FINMAG)
FINMA Market Manipulation Sanctions Upheld
Legal basis for the confiscation of profits obtained through serious breaches of supervisory law.
B-4762/2017 (Art. 35 Abs. 1 FINMAG)
*FCA v. Company X: Market Manipulation and Profit Confiscation Upheld*
Basis for the FINMA to confiscate profits obtained through serious violations of supervisory law.
B-1034/2017 (Art. 35 Abs. 1 FINMAG)
Financial Group's Profit Confiscation Deemed Moot by Settlement
This provision allows the supervisory authority to confiscate profits obtained through serious violations of supervisory law.