Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
832.10 CH-TG

§ 74 Krankenversicherungsverordnung (TG KVV) - Fehlendes Bedarfserfassungssystem

Übergangs- und Schlussbestimmungen
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (81 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

§ 74 TG KVV · Fehlendes Bedarfserfassungssystem

1. Leistungserbringer ohne zugelassenes Bedarfsabklärungssystem sind bis zu dessen Einführung nicht zur Geltendmachung der Restkostenfinanzierung berechtigt.

← § 72 TG KVV Krankenversicherungsverordnung (TG KVV) - Inhalt

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (6)

36.2003.46 · ti (art. 74 cpv. 2 LAMal)
Insured Person v. Insurer: Sickness Benefit Overpayment Repayment and Prescription Interruption
Cited in the reasoning (1.4 and 2.9) concerning the entitlement to 16 weeks of maternity benefits which are not counted in the 720 days.
36.2003.46 · ti (art. 74 cpv. 2 LAMal)
Insured Person v. Insurer: Sickness Benefit Overpayment Repayment and Prescription Interruption
Cited in the reasoning (2.) of the administrative decision regarding the 16 weeks of maternity allowance.
36.2000.121 · ti (Art. 74 LAMal)
Former Employees v. Health Insurance Provider: Maternity Benefits Entitlement
Cited in the reasoning to establish the right to maternity benefits, but the dispositive uses paragraph 2 specifically (Art. 74 cpv. 2 LAMal is listed above).
36.2000.121 · ti (Art. 74 cpv. 2 LAMal)
Former Employees v. Health Insurance Provider: Maternity Benefits Entitlement
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for the successful claim that the defendant must pay maternity benefits for 16 weeks (112 daily allowances).
36.2000.121 · ti (art. 74 cpv. 2 LAMal)
Former Employees v. Health Insurance Provider (Maternity Daily Allowances Coverage Dispute)
This article establishes the duration of the maternity daily allowance (16 weeks), which the Tribunal ruled the insurer must pay.
36.2003.6 · ti (art. 74 LAMal)
Employee v. Health Insurance Fund: Sickness Benefits Preceding Maternity Leave for Complicated Twin Pregnancy
Cited in the reasoning by analogy when discussing the contractual provisions for daily allowances related to pregnancy and childbirth, but not in the final orders.