§ 21 Einführungsgesetz zum Bundesgesetz über den Schutz der Gewässer (EG GSchG) - Inkrafttreten

A/931/2025 · ge (art. 21 al. 3 LPAC)

Nurse Dismissal Upheld Due to Persistent Professional Misconduct and Patient Safety Risks

The appeal was rejected because a well-founded reason for termination existed, citing the legal basis for termination for a public servant when their continued employment is incompatible with the proper functioning of the administration.

A/2044/2023 · ge (art. 21 al. 3 LPAC)

Employee Misconduct Leading to Lawful Dismissal After Procedural Flaw

This article establishes the authority to terminate employment for a justified reason and is cited in the context of confirming the grounds for dismissal.

A/2890/2024 · ge (art. 21 al. 3 LPAC)

Nurse Turban Religious Neutrality Dismissal Appeal

Cited in the context of the authority's power to terminate service for a well-founded reason, forming the primary basis for the final order rejecting the appeal (along with Art. 22 LPAC).

A/2254/2024 · ge (art. 21 al. 1 LPAC)

Probationary Employee Termination Upheld Due to Performance and Conduct

This article governs the termination of service relationships for employees (not civil servants) during their probationary period, which is the substantive basis for reviewing the merits of the termination.

A/358/2024 · ge (Art. 21 al. 3 LPAC)

Termination of Public Service Consultant Upheld Due to Loss of Confidence and Performance Deficits

Cited regarding the requirement for prior completion of the reclassification procedure before termination for a well-founded reason.

A/1242/2024 · ge (art. 21 al. 1 LPAC)

Police Aspirant Termination Upheld Due to Misconduct

Cited in contrast to confirm that, as a trainee, the termination of service was not subject to the existence of a 'justified ground' required for civil servants.

A/1242/2024 · ge (art. 21 al. 3 in fine LPAC)

Police Aspirant Termination Upheld Due to Misconduct

Cited in contrast to confirm that the employer was not obliged to respect the principle of redeployment (reclassement) for trainees.

A/981/2024 · ge (art. 21 al. 3 LPAC)

Public Servant Dismissal Annulled for Violation of Legality Principle

Cited in the dispositive regarding the basis used by the employer for termination for good cause, which the court found insufficient for immediate termination.

A/4116/2023 · ge (art. 21 al. 1 LPAC)

Employee Termination Upheld for Misrepresentation During Probation

This provision, concerning termination of employment relationships during the probationary period, is the substantive basis for upholding the termination.

A/2933/2023 · ge (art. 21 al. 3 LPAC)

Employee Performance Termination Upheld Against Higher Education Institution Secretary

This provision allows the competent authority to terminate service reports for a well-founded reason, which underlies the termination upheld in this case, following the reclassification procedure.

A/1663/2022 · ge (art. 21 al. 3 LPAC)

Termination of Public Employee for Unjustified Absence and Performance Issues Upheld

Cited as the basis for terminating service contracts for just cause.

A/1663/2022 · ge (art. 21 al. 3 LPAC)

Termination of Public Employee for Unjustified Absence and Performance Issues Upheld

Cited in the context of the legal basis for the requirement of a proper reintegration procedure before termination.

A/2706/2023 · ge (art. 21 al. 3 LPAC)

Prison Clerk Termination Upheld for Drug Use and Breach of Secrecy

Although cited in the context of justified ground for termination, the court implicitly confirmed the decision that excluded the reclassification procedure due to the seriousness of the facts.

A/1527/2023 · ge (art. 21 al. 3 LPAC)

Termination of Civil Service Based on Health Incapacity Upheld

The court confirmed that the administrative authority correctly followed the procedure of professional reintegration before terminating the employment relationship.

A/2149/2023 · ge (art. 21 al. 3 LPAC)

Employee Dismissal Upheld Due to Irreparable Breach of Trust and Chronic Misconduct

Cited in the reasoning regarding the principle of proportionality concerning the lack of reassignment, which was upheld.