814.20
CH-TG
CH-TG
§ 16 Einführungsgesetz zum Bundesgesetz über den Schutz der Gewässer (EG GSchG) - Strafbestimmung
Straf-, Übergangs- und Schlussbestimmungen
§ 16 EG GSchG · Strafbestimmung
1. Wer vorsätzlich gegen die Bewilligungspflicht nach § 8 Abs. 1 oder die Meldepflicht nach § 9b Abs. 4 verstösst, wird mit Busse bis Fr. 20'000 bestraft.
2. Handelt die Täterschaft fahrlässig, ist die Strafe Busse bis zu Fr. 10'000.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (47)
A/1498/2025 · ge (art. 16 al. 1 let. a LPAC)
Nurse's Appeal of Reprimand for Refusing to Release Psychiatric Report Denied
The court upheld the decision to issue a reprimand, which is listed as one of the sanctions in this provision.
A/981/2024 · ge (art. 16 LPAC)
Public Servant Dismissal Annulled for Violation of Legality Principle
Cited in the reasoning to establish the correct procedure (revocation) for a civil servant seeking immediate termination, forming part of the core legal error identified.
A/2134/2022 · ge (Art. 16 al. 1 LPAC)
Civil Servant Dismissal Upheld for Repeated Duty Violations and Breach of Trust
This article sanctions the violation of service duties, justifying the revocation pronounced in the final order.
A/2081/2021 · ge (Art. 16 al. 1 let. c LPAC)
Appeal Dismissed: Termination for Long-Term Incapacity Upheld
Cited in the discussion regarding the competence of the decision-making authority, specifically the CA's role versus delegation possibilities.
A/3054/2021 · ge (art. 16 LPAC)
Nurse Reprimand Upheld for Sexual Harassment in Workplace
The court rejected the appeal and confirmed the reprimand based on the disciplinary sanction catalogue provided in this article.
A/3663/2021 · ge (art. 16 LPAC)
Employee Reprimand Upheld for Unprofessional Conduct in Videoconference
The primary ground for upholding the disciplinary sanction (blâme) against the appellant.
A/2912/2020 · ge (art. 16 al. 1 LPAC)
Police Officer Sanction Upheld for Inappropriate Relationship with Massage Parlor Manager
This provision enumerates the disciplinary sanctions applicable to personnel who breach their duties, used to examine the nature and extent of the sanction imposed.
A/2419/2018 · ge (art. 16 LPAC)
Employee Termination Upheld Due to False Assault Accusation and Policy Violations
The court confirmed that the disciplinary sanction (reprimand) applied by the employer respected the catalog of sanctions provided by this article.
A/19/2020 · ge (art. 16 al. 1 LPAC)
Civil Servant Reprimand Upheld for Alcohol Consumption and Workplace Misconduct
The court upheld the reprimand (blâme) based on the disciplinary sanctions provided for in this article.
A/3694/2020 · ge (art. 16 al. 1 let. c ch. 5 de la loi générale relative au personnel de l'administration cantonale, du pouvoir judiciaire et des établissements publics médicaux du 4 décembre 1997 - LPAC - B 5 05)
Administrative Employee Appeal of Immediate Revocation for Performance Document Tampering
Cited in the reasoning to contextualize the sanction of dismissal, but not explicitly used in the dispositive orders.
A/3473/2019 · ge (Art. 16 al. 1 LPAC)
Public Servant Disciplinary Dismissal for Unauthorized Archive Access Upheld
Cited as the basis for the possible sanctions that can be applied to public officials, which underpins the decision to uphold the revocation.
A/3797/2016 · ge (art. 16 LPAC)
Administrative Reassignment Challenged Dismissed
Cited when discussing the nature of disciplinary sanctions, in relation to the applicant's argument that the transfer was a disguised sanction.
A/3463/2018 · ge (art. 16 al. 1 LPAC)
Social Worker Dismissed for Consensual Relationship with Client Mother
This article sets out the possible disciplinary sanctions, including revocation, which was the sanction imposed.
A/3463/2018 · ge (art. 16 al. 2 LPAC)
Social Worker Dismissed for Consensual Relationship with Client Mother
This article concerns the immediate effect of revocation, which was ordered.
A/1245/2018 · ge (art. 16 al. 1 let. c LPAC)
Employee Revocation Appeal Upheld Due to Prescription and Proportionality
Cited in the context of the grounds for revocation, which the court ultimately deemed time-barred or disproportionate.