700.1
PBVOPV
CH-TG
CH-TG
§ 43 Verordnung zum Planungs- und Baugesetz und zur Interkantonalen Vereinbarung über die Harmonisierung der Baubegriffe (PBV) - Waldabstand[[1]](#articletitle_text_fn_713190_2_1_c)
Begriffe und Messweisen - Übrige Begriffe und Messweisen
§ 43 PBV · Waldabstand[[1]](#articletitle_text_fn_713190_2_1_c)
1. Der Waldabstand und der Abstand gegenüber Ufergehölzen werden ab der nach § 2 Abs. 4 des Waldgesetzes (WaldG) festgelegten Waldgrenze gemessen.
2. Über Zustimmungen nach § 93 PBG zur Unterschreitung der Abstände nach § 75 PBG entscheidet das Kantonsforstamt.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (78)
VVGE.2005.06.Nr.40 · ow (Art. 37a RPG in Verbindung mit Art. 43 Abs. 1 RPV)
Mobile Phone Antennas on Existing Mast Require Building Permit
The court used these provisions to reject the possibility of an eased exception permit for a change of use of commercial buildings and facilities outside of building zones.
VB.2004.00314 · zh (Art. 43 Abs. I RPV)
Planning Appeal: Non-Conforming Use Conversion Standing and Precedent
The court cited this specific paragraph when ruling that the expansion and change of purpose are independent measures under the final decision.
VB.2004.00314 · zh (Art. 43 RPV)
Planning Appeal: Non-Conforming Use Conversion Standing and Precedent
The court applied this article, along with Art. 37a RPG, in determining the conditions for the change of use in its final orders.
VB.2003.00416 · zh (Art. 43 RPV)
Appeal Regarding Refusal of Permit for Complete Conversion of Structure Outside Building Zone
The court referred to Art. 43 RPV when interpreting the requirements of Art. 37a RPG restrictively.
VB.2004.00314 · zh (Art. 43 Abs. I RPV)
Non-Owner Standing to Appeal Land Use Change; Prior Expansion No Bar to Residential Conversion
This specific paragraph was cited in relation to extension and change of use being independent measures.
VB.2004.00314 · zh (Art. 43 RPV)
Non-Owner Standing to Appeal Land Use Change; Prior Expansion No Bar to Residential Conversion
The court applied this provision regarding the requirements for extension and change of use, which must be met for the Umnutzung under Art. 37a RPG.
A/1570/2015 · ge (art. 43 al. 3 OAT)
Appeal on Building Permit Refusal for Indispensable Horse Box Expansion
The court based its final decision on the indispensability of the enlargement under this provision, ultimately finding it to be met.
A/4205/2023 · ge (art. 43 al. 2 et 3 OAT)
Municipality v. Territorial Department on Agricultural Land Regularization
The decision was annulled and the case was referred back to the department for examination of the conditions set out in this article, which governs enlargements outside the built volume.
A/1706/2022 · ge (art. 43 OAT)
Appeal Regarding Building Permit for Pre-Zoning Mushroom Cultivation Facility
The court admitted the appeal and overturned the lower court's decision, finding that the conditions of Art. 37a LAT and Art. 43 OAT were met, which justified the building permit.
A/2143/2023 · ge (art. 43 OAT)
Applicants v. Administrative Department Regarding Building Permit Denial for Unapproved Commercial Alterations Requiring Multiple Derogations
Cited in the reasoning as one of the federal provisions whose conditions for exemption were not demonstrated by the appellant, confirming the refusal of the building permit.
WBE.2023.235 · ag (Art. 37a RPG i.V.m Art. 43 RPV)
Farm Roof Demolition Upheld in Appeal
Cited as the legal basis for considering the possibility of an exception permit for non-agricultural businesses that have become non-conforming, and ultimately finding the Hofüberdachung not covered by this guarantee.
A/202/2023 · ge (art. 43 OAT)
Appeal Against Refusal of Building Permit and Demolition Order on Agricultural Plot
Cited regarding the possibility of authorizing changes of use for commercial/artisanal constructions outside building zones, which the court rejected as inapplicable.
A/3719/2022 · ge (art. 43 OAT)
Appeal Regarding Change of Use for Pre-existing Commercial Facility in Agricultural Zone
The court applied this article concerning the conditions for authorizing changes of use and enlargements of commercial or artisanal constructions outside the building zone when rejecting the appeal.
A/17/2021 · ge (art. 43 OAT)
Riding Arena Expansion Permit Rejection Appeal
The court rejected the appeal based on the applicant failing to meet the conditions set out in this article concerning enlargements of non-conforming commercial constructions in agricultural zones.
A/1570/2015 · ge (art. 43 al. 3 OAT)
Appeal Regarding Construction Permit Denial for Hangar and Horse Boxes on Agricultural Land
The appeal was partially admitted and the case was remanded because the necessity of the enlargement for maintaining the company, required for enlargements over 100 m2, was not examined by the lower court.