700.1
PBVOPV
CH-TG
CH-TG
§ 39 Verordnung zum Planungs- und Baugesetz und zur Interkantonalen Vereinbarung über die Harmonisierung der Baubegriffe (PBV) - Terrassenhäuser
Begriffe und Messweisen - Übrige Begriffe und Messweisen
§ 39 PBV · Terrassenhäuser
1. Terrassenhäuser sind in der Höhe gestaffelte Gebäude mit mehr als zwei talwärts orientierten Gebäudestufen, bei welchen das Verhältnis der Grundfläche von Terrasse und zurückversetzter Gebäudeeinheit pro Gebäudestufe mindestens 1:3 beträgt. Dabei muss das Gefälle des massgebenden Terrains grösser sein als 10 %.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (64)
VPB 2006.752 (art. 39, al. 2, OAT (art. 45 OAT))
Federal Approval of Bern Cantonal Master Plan Modifications
Cited for the communication of authorizations issued by the canton to the ODT.
AC.2024.0238 · vd (Art. 39 ss OAT)
Appeal Against Illicit Construction Ruling Annulled Due to Procedural Flaw in Land Regularization Assessment
Cited in the reasoning regarding regulations for construction outside building zones, but not in the dispositive.
120 2024 65 · be (Art. 39 Abs. 1 RPV)
Appeal Against Demolition Order for Exceeding Permitted GFA Under Statutory Provisions
The court determined that the unauthorized modifications exceeded the scope of Art. 39 RPV (no significant change to structure/appearance).
110 2024 128 · be (Art. 24 RPG i.V.m. Art. 39 Abs. 1 RPV)
Building Permit Denial Upheld for Substantial Structural Alteration of Agricultural Building
The appeal was dismissed because the requested exception permit according to this provision was rightly denied by the AGR.
110 2024 128 · be (Art. 39 Abs. 3 RPV)
Building Permit Denial Upheld for Substantial Structural Alteration of Agricultural Building
The ground for denying the exception permit was the non-compliance with the requirement that the structural integrity remain essentially unchanged.
52.2021.22 · ti (art. 39 cpv. 2 OPT)
Appeal Dismissed for Building Permit Cancellation on Dilapidated Protected Buildings
The court confirmed that the planned works could not be authorized based on this provision because the buildings no longer met the preservation criteria.
90.2021.11 · ti (art. 39 cpv. 2 OPT)
Cantonal Landscape Plan Challenge Regarding Rural Building Protection and Land Separation
The ruling partially accepts the appeal concerning the Valle Maggia region (Sector 18) because the sectors do not meet the criteria for inclusion in the PUC-PEIP, which is based on this provision.
90.2021.17 · ti (art. 39 cpv. 2 OPT)
Cantonal Land Use Plan Landscape Protection Challenge and Partial Annulment
The legal basis for the criteria governing protected landscapes, which the court applied in the decision to partially uphold the appeal.
90.2021.19 · ti (art. 39 cpv. 2 OPT)
Cantonal Landscape Plan Challenge Upheld in Part for Magadino Region
The partial acceptance of the appeal is based on the finding that the sectors do not meet the requirements set forth in this provision regarding protected landscapes.
90.2021.25 · ti (art. 39 cpv. 2 OPT)
Cantonal Land Use Plan Challenge Regarding Monti di Bellinzona Landscape Protection
The decision partially grants the appeal, removing specific sectors from the PUC-PEIP based on the criteria defined in this article (regarding protected buildings and landscapes).
90.2021.28 · ti (art. 39 cpv. 2 OPT)
Cantonal Land Use Plan Challenge Regarding Rural Building Protection in Val Colla/Val Capriasca
The core of the ruling is based on finding that certain sectors did not meet the requirements of Art. 39 para. 2 OPT (regarding protected landscape units) and thus should be struck from the PUC-PEIP.
90.2021.29 · ti (art. 39 cpv. 2 OPT)
Cantonal Land Use Plan Challenge for Protected Landscapes (PUC-PEIP) Zoning
The sectors were excluded from the PUC-PEIP because they did not meet the requirements of Art. 39 para. 2 OPT regarding protected landscapes and buildings.
90.2021.9 · ti (Art. 39 cpv. 2 OPT)
Land-Use Plan Challenge Regarding Protected Rural Landscapes and Buildable Zones
The partial acceptance of the appeal relies on the criteria set out in this provision for the modification of land use for protected buildings, which the court found not met in the excluded sectors.
90.2020.60 · ti (art. 39 cpv. 2 OPT)
Challenge to Cantonal Land Use Plan Regarding Protected Landscapes and Rural Buildings
The partial acceptance of the appeal is based on the finding that certain sectors do not meet the criteria for inclusion in the PUC-PEIP, as defined by this article.
90.2020.61 · ti (art. 39 cpv. 2 OPT)
Cantonal Landscape Plan Challenge Regarding Protected Rural Building Stock
The decision partially accepts the appeal based on the failure of the contested sectors to meet the requirements set out in this article concerning protected landscapes and buildings.