700.1
PBVOPV
CH-TG
CH-TG
§ 24 Verordnung zum Planungs- und Baugesetz und zur Interkantonalen Vereinbarung über die Harmonisierung der Baubegriffe (PBV) - Vorspringende und unbedeutend rückspringende Gebäudeteile
Begriffe und Messweisen - Ergänzende Vorschriften zur Interkantonalen Vereinbarung über die Harmonisierung der Baubegriffe (IVHB)[[1]](#titletitle_text_fn_179124_2_1_c)
§ 24 PBV · Vorspringende und unbedeutend rückspringende Gebäudeteile
1. Vorspringende Gebäudeteile dürfen wie folgt über den dazugehörigen Fassadenabschnitt hinausragen
1. * ausserhalb des Grenzabstandes auf der ganzen Länge um maximal 3.00 m
2. * innerhalb des Grenzabstandes auf 1/3 der Länge um maximal 1.50 m
2. Unbedeutend rückspringende Gebäudeteile dürfen höchstens eine Tiefe von 1.00 m und eine maximale Breite von 1.00 m aufweisen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (12)
VPB No-23-18-juin-1996 (Art. 24 OAT)
Federal Laws: Spatial Planning, Aviation, Tariffs, International Salvage Convention, and Errata
This article is cited in the dispositive regarding exceptions to building zone regulations outside of building zones.
90.1998.77 · ti (art. 24 cpv. 2 e 3 OPT (abrogata))
Property Owner Appeal of Agricultural Zoning Classification Rejected
Cited in the reasoning section to indicate the federal law basis for change of use prior to the current version.
90.1998.77 · ti (art. 24 cpv. 2 e 4 OPT (modifica del 22 maggio 1996))
Property Owner Appeal of Agricultural Zoning Classification Rejected
Cited in the reasoning section to indicate the federal law basis for change of use prior to the current version.
90.1997.166 · ti (art. 24 cpv. 1 lett. a) OPT)
Municipality v. State Council on Zoning Plan Amendment Validity
Cited in the reasoning regarding the use of buildings in traditional settlements with dispersed housing, which the court found inapplicable to the case.
90.1997.166 · ti (art. 24 cpv. 2 OPT)
Municipality v. State Council on Zoning Plan Amendment Validity
Cited in the reasoning establishing the possibility to change the destination of buildings contributing to landscape character.
90.1997.166 · ti (art. 24 cpv. 2 OPT)
Municipality v. State Council on Zoning Plan Amendment Validity
Cited in the reasoning regarding the possibility to totally change the destination of buildings that characterize the landscape.
90.1997.166 · ti (art. 24 cpv. 4 lett. d) OPT)
Municipality v. State Council on Zoning Plan Amendment Validity
Cited in the reasoning regarding the prerequisite that external appearance and basic building structure remain substantially unchanged for land use modification.
90.1995.117 · ti (Art. 23 e 24 OPT)
Municipality Land-Use Plan Modification Appeal Regarding Agricultural Settlement Zones and Implementation Regulations
Cited in Section 4.2 as provisions of cantonal law whose legal basis is questioned regarding presumptive 'vincolata ubicazione'.
90.1996.79 · ti (Art. 24 OPT)
Appeal Against Reclassification of Traditional Building Outside Building Zones
Although mentioned in the preamble, the specific provision that grounds the acceptance of the appeal (annulment of the declassification) is linked to the rules concerning the classification (meritevole 1a vs 1d), which involve Art. 24 OPT.
90.1996.79 · ti (art. 24 OPT)
Appeal Against Reclassification of Traditional Building Outside Building Zones
Cited in the preamble to applicable law and forms the substantive basis for the judgment regarding the classification of the building.
52.1996.183 · ti (Art. 24 OPT)
Municipality v. Property Owner: Barn Conversion Overruling
Cited as the legal basis for potential modifications of existing buildings in protected landscapes.
VPB 89-691 (Art. 23 und 24 RPV)
Motion on Land Market Normalization
Cited in the Federal Council's written statement for new provisions on the use of existing buildings outside building zones.