700.1
PBVOPV
CH-TG
§ 2 Verordnung zum Planungs- und Baugesetz und zur Interkantonalen Vereinbarung über die Harmonisierung der Baubegriffe (PBV) - Mitwirkung
Allgemeine Bestimmungen
§ 2 PBV · Mitwirkung
1. Schriftliche Anträge im Rahmen der Mitwirkung sind schriftlich zu beantworten.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (38)
VPB du-8-avril-1992 (Art. 2, 3e al., OAT)
Federal Council Decree on Minimum Agricultural Land Area and Cantonal Allocations
This provision is referenced in relation to the cantons' reporting duties to the Federal Office for Spatial Development.
AC.2024.0379 · vd (art. 2 et 3 OAT)
Appeal Dismissal Regarding Zoning Approval for Event Center and Road Development
Cited as planning principles to be respected during the review.
VB.2023.00035 · zh (Art. 2 Abs. I RPV)
Gravel Pit Development Plan Upheld, Minor Regulations Amended
The court applied this provision when considering the spatial planning framework.
B.2022.40 · sg (Art. 2 und 3 RPV)
Zoning Approval Upheld Despite Cultural Monument Concerns
These articles concerning planning principles were cited in the final order as not violated by the appealed decision.
B.2022.40 · sg (Art. 2 und 3 RPV)
Special Use Plan Approval Upheld Despite Tree Removal and Zoning Deviations near Cultural Monument
The court confirmed the legality of the zoning plan in relation to the cantonal planning principles after balancing interests.
AC.2021.0003 · vd (art. 2 et 3 OAT)
Land Use Reclassification Upheld Against Property Owner Challenge
These articles concern planning principles that the court verified were respected in the land-use plan.
B.2022.20 · sg (Art. 2 f. RPV)
Zoning Plan Legality Upheld for High-Rise Construction
Cited as criteria for weighing interests in land use planning, which the court found to be correctly applied by the lower instance.
A-7192/2018 (art. 2 al. 1 let. b OAT)
Railway Project Approval Upheld Despite Accessibility and Environmental Concerns
Requires authorities to examine possibilities and variants of solutions when planning activities affecting spatial organization.
AC.2017.0388 · vd (Art. 2 et 3 OAT)
Cantonal Reserve Upheld Despite Municipal Zoning Process
Cited in the reasoning regarding the general principles of planning, but not explicitly cited in the operative parts (I-IV).
2018.03.28.vv.2 · bl (Art. 2 Abs. 3 RPV)
Municipality v. Province: Groundwater Protection and Watercourse Designation
This provision mandates the coordination of spatial activities, and its violation was the ground for partially upholding the appeal, requiring the planning report to reflect groundwater protection concerns.
B.2015.71 · sg (Art. 2 und Art. 3 RPV)
Zoning Dispute: Green Zone Designation vs. Property Rights and Land Hoarding
Cited in the reasoning section concerning proportionality, but not in the final operative orders (1-3).
B.2014.107.und.weite · sg (Art. 2 Abs. 3 RPV)
Geissberg/Altenwegen Zoning Amendment Overturned Due to Lack of Changed Circumstances
Cited in E. 16 regarding the avoidance of mutual hindrance between planning of neighboring areas, relevant to the planning context.
B.2014.107.und.weitere · sg (Art. 2 Abs. 3 RPV)
Geissberg/Altenwegen Land-Use Plan Adjustment Over Traffic Limits Annulled
Used in the context of inter-municipal planning coordination, stating that mutual hindrances and contradictions should be avoided.
ADM 2014 34 · ju (Art. 2 al. 1 let. b OAT)
Annulment of Hotel Zoning Plan on Agricultural Land Due to Insufficient Justification and Environmental Concerns
The court used this article to assess the requirement for examining alternative solutions and variants for the project.
AC.2013.0494 · vd (art. 2 al. 1 let. b OAT)
Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Agricultural Release Zone Extension
Cited in the reasoning section when describing the necessity to examine different possibilities and variants during the legality check.