101
KV
CH-TG
CH-TG
§ 29 Verfassung des Kantons Thurgau (KV) - Unvereinbarkeit
Behörden - Organisatorische Grundsätze
§ 29 KV · Unvereinbarkeit
1. Niemand darf seiner unmittelbaren Aufsichtsbehörde angehören.
2. Die Mitglieder des Regierungsrates, der Staatsschreiber, die Mitglieder und Ersatzmitglieder des Obergerichtes, des Verwaltungsgerichtes, des Zwangsmassnahmengerichtes und der Rekurskommissionen sowie die nicht vom Volk gewählten Mitarbeiter der Bezirksgerichte und der Gerichte und Verwaltungen des Kantons und seiner öffentlich-rechtlichen Anstalten dürfen nicht dem Grossen Rat angehören.
3. Mitglieder und Ersatzmitglieder eines Gerichtes oder einer Gemeindebehörde dürfen nicht dem Regierungsrat angehören.
4. Weitere Unvereinbarkeiten regelt das Gesetz.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (82)
RBOG.2016.Nr.34 · tg (Art. 29 Abs. 3 BV)
Criminal Appellant Liability for Procedural Fees Despite Legal Aid
The provision on legal aid was considered in relation to the appellant's request for definitive exemption from procedural costs.
RBOG.2010.Nr.1 · tg (Art. 29 Abs. 1 BV)
Admissibility of Extra-Cantonal Speed Measurement Evidence
This provision, along with Art. 6 Ziff. 1 EMRK, establishes the principle of a fair trial, which determined the admissibility of the evidence.
RBOG.2009.Nr.28 · tg (Art. 29 Abs. 3 BV)
Indigent Litigant's Liability for Opposing Counsel Fees Despite Free Legal Aid
Cited as the constitutional standard regarding the right to free legal assistance, establishing that it does not grant exemption from paying the opposing party's compensation.
RBOG.2015.Nr.15 · tg (Art. 29 Abs. 1 BV)
Appeal Admission Based on Substantive Interpretation of Reasoning Over Formal Defect
Cited in relation to the prohibition of excessive formalism when interpreting appeal requests, although not directly used in the final operative orders regarding the merits or procedure.
TVR.2024.Nr.12 · tg (Art. 29 Abs. 3 BV)
Applicant Fails to Substantiate Financial Need for Legal Aid
Cited as the constitutional basis for granting free legal aid, which was denied here based on the applicant's failure to meet obligations.
RBOG.2020.Nr.1 · tg (Art. 29 BV)
Parental Access to Guardian's Private Notes in Child Protection Case
This constitutional right to a fair hearing was considered, but the court found no violation because the requested documents were not relevant to the KESB's decision-making process.
RBOG.2019.Nr.3 · tg (Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV)
Eviction Service Presumption Contingent on Formal Commencement of Proceedings
Cited as the constitutional provision violated due to denied right to be heard, leading to the case being remanded.
TVR.2019.Nr.1 · tg (Art. 29 Abs. 1 BV)
Timeliness of Legal Aid Decision in Litigation
This provision establishes the fairness requirement that mandated the prior decision on the application for legal aid.
TVR.2019.Nr.1 · tg (Art. 29 Abs. 3 BV)
Timeliness of Legal Aid Decision in Litigation
This provision is the basis for the right to legal aid, the refusal of which was partly overturned by the court.
TVR.2018.Nr.32 · tg (Art. 29 Abs. 3 BV)
Pension Withdrawal Disqualifies Indigency for Legal Aid
Cited as the constitutional basis for the right to legal aid, which was ultimately denied.
TVR.2016.Nr.6 · tg (Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV)
Driving License Withdrawal Upheld Despite Procedural Flaws in File Management
This provision established the fundamental right to be heard, which was central to the appellant's formal complaints regarding procedural deficiencies.
RBOG.2016.Nr.34 · tg (Art. 29 Abs. 3 BV)
Indigent Appellant's Liability for Appeal Costs Despite Free Legal Aid
Cited to establish that indigence does not grant an absolute exemption from procedural costs in the final orders.
TVR.2014.Nr.2 · tg (Art. 29 Abs. 1 BV)
Public Procurement Conflict of Interest and Recusal
Cited as a constitutional basis alongside § 7 VRG concerning the duty of impartiality.
RBOG.2014.Nr.1 · tg (Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV)
Right to be Heard Violation in Involuntary Psychiatric Treatment Appeal
Cited as the constitutional basis for the violation of the right to be heard, which led to the case being returned for a new decision.
TVR.2014.Nr.40 · tg (Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV)
Probationary Termination Upheld Due to Adequate Oral Notice of Performance Deficiencies
This article establishes the right to a hearing, which the reasoning confirms implies the right to be heard before the termination decision, although the court ultimately found that the employee was sufficiently heard in substance.