234.110
VRP
CH-SZ
CH-SZ
§ 72 Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetz (VRP), vom 6. Juni 1974
2 Zivilrecht, Strafrecht, Rechtspflege » 23 Rechtspflege » 234 Verwaltungsrechtspflege
§ 72 Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetz (VRP), vom 6. Juni 1974
2. Kostenauflage
1 Die Kosten für den Erlass von Verfügungen trägt in der Regel die Partei, welche
den Erlass verlangt hat.
2 Die Kosten für den Erlass eines Entscheides oder Zwischenbescheides werden
in der Regel der unterliegenden Partei überbunden. Unterliegt sie nur teilweise,
werden die Kosten auf die Parteien anteilsmässig verteilt.
3 Die obsiegende Partei kommt für die Kosten auf, die sie durch ein pflichtwidri-
ges Verhalten im Verfahren verursacht hat.
4 Wird ein Verfahren gegenstandslos, so liegt der Entscheid über die Kostenfolge
im Ermessen der Behörde.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (316)
II 2025 13 · sz (§ 72 VRP)
Holding Company Waste Fee Challenge Dismissed
Procedural rule applied for imposing court costs on the unsuccessful appellant.
II 2025 16 · sz (§ 72 VRP)
Holding Company Waste Fee Upheld
Cited in the dispositive as the basis for imposing court costs on the unsuccessful appellant.
III 2025 10 · sz (§ 72 Abs. 2 VRP)
Building Permit Approval Upheld Despite Traffic and Water Protection Concerns
Cited for the imposition of court costs on the appellant.
III 2025 173 · sz (§ 72 Abs. 2 VRP)
Cantonal Road Expansion Appeal Dismissed for Insufficient Substantive Challenge
The appellant was ordered to pay the procedural costs due to the non-admission of the appeal.
III 2024 181 · sz (§ 72 des Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetzes [VRP; SRSZ 234.110] vom 6.6.1974)
Appeal Against Building Permits for Forest Road Over Mire and Protected Habitat Upheld in Part
Applied for the apportionment of court costs for the administrative court appeal procedure.
III 2025 12 · sz (§ 72 Abs. 2 VRP)
Applicant v. Municipality (Jetty Permit and Vested Rights)
Cited in the final order for imposing court costs on the appellant.
III 2025 33 · sz (§ 72 VRP)
Procurement Award Annulled Due to Failure to Evaluate Permitted Variant Offer
Cited as the basis for ordering the administrative costs of the proceedings against the lower court (Vorinstanz).
III 2024 192 · sz (§ 72 Abs. 2 VRP)
Building Permit Appeal Regarding Terrain Baseline and Utilization Ratios
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for ordering the appellant to bear the court costs.
III 2024 126 · sz (§ 72 Abs. 2 VRP)
Administrative Court Upholds Drainage Pipe Permit Despite Dispute Over Stabilization Concept
Cited to justify imposing the administrative court proceedings costs on the appellant (Order 2).
III 2025 64 · sz (§ 72 VRP)
Zoning Parking Mandate and Paving Specification Review
Basis for imposing court costs on the appellant.
III 2023 160 · sz (Art. 72 Abs. 2 VRP)
Expropriation Compensation for Right-of-Way Servitude under Land Association Mandate
Applied to order the appellant to bear the administrative court proceedings costs.
III 2024 167 · sz (Art. 72 Abs. 2 VRP)
Applicants v. Municipality Regarding Multi-Family Home Permit Denial
Cited as the basis for imposing procedural costs on the appellants.
III 2025 23 · sz (§ 72 VRP)
Refusal of Settlement Permit Upheld Due to Failure to Meet Language Proficiency Requirements
Cited as the legal basis for imposing the procedural costs on the appellant.
III 2025 26 · sz (§ 72 VRP)
Appeal on Permit Denial Deemed Inadmissible Due to Scope Expansion
This provision was applied to impose the court costs on the appellant due to the outcome of the procedure (non-admission).
III 2025 35 · sz (§ 72 VRP)
Residency Permit Revocation Following Relationship Termination
Cited as the basis for ordering the appellant to pay the court costs.