231.110
JG
CH-SZ
CH-SZ
§ 40 Justizgesetz (JG), vom 18. November 2009
2 Zivilrecht, Strafrecht, Rechtspflege » 23 Rechtspflege » 231 Allgemeines
§ 40 Justizgesetz (JG), vom 18. November 2009
Präsidialbefugnisse
1 Der Präsident des Gerichts sorgt für die Verfahrens- und Verhandlungsleitung,
namentlich den Erlass von Vorladungen, die Einberufung des Gerichts bzw. der
Kammern, die Referatszuteilung und die Sitzungspolizei nach Massgabe des Bun-
desrechts, das auch für die weiteren kantonalen Verfahren gilt.
2 Über Nichteintreten, Verfahrensabschreibung, Zwischenfragen, insbesondere
vorsorgliche Massnahmen, unentgeltliche Rechtspflege, Sicherheitsleistungen
und Beweisabnahmen, sowie genehmigungsbedürftige Vereinbarungen kann prä-
sidial entschieden werden. Zudem führt der Präsident die Instruktionsverhandlun-
gen durch.
3 Er kann ferner über die Erstattung von Vernehmlassungen, die Berichtigung von
offenkundigen Versehen wie Schreibfehler und Rechnungsirrtümer, die irrige Be-
zeichnung der Parteien sowie in Zivilsachen über die Erläuterung entscheiden.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (259)
ZK2 2025 65 · sz (§ 40 Abs. 2 i.V.m. § 41 Abs. 1 JG)
Eviction Upheld After Appeal Fails to Challenge Valid Lease Termination
The appeal was dismissed on procedural grounds (failure to provide a sufficient statement of grounds) via presidential procedure based on this provision.
STK 2025 52 · sz (§ 40 Abs. 2 JG)
Prosecution Appeal Dismissed for Failure to File Reasoned Statement
Cited as the basis allowing the appeal to be dismissed by way of presidential ruling when the statement of appeal is omitted.
ZK2 2025 66 · sz (§§ 40 Abs. 2 und 41 Abs. 1 JG)
Withdrawal of Appeal on Provisional Measures and Costs Allocation
These articles regulated the possibility of deciding on the striking off of the proceedings by presidential order.
BEK 2025 128 · sz (§ 40 Abs. 2 und 41 Abs. 1 JG)
Complainant v. Prosecutor (Trespass Proceedings Discontinuance Appeal)
Cited as the basis for the decision not to enter judgment due to the failure to provide reasons.
STK 2025 44 · sz (§§ 40 Abs. 2 und 41 Abs. 1 JG)
Appeal Dismissed for Failure to File Statement of Grounds
Cited as the legal basis for dismissing the appeal by presidential order after the declaration was omitted.
BEK 2025 114 · sz (§ 40 Abs. 2 JG)
Prosecutor's Denial of Custody Visit Upheld on Appeal
The court applied this rule (alongside Art. 388 Abs. 2 lit. b StPO) to proceed by way of simplified procedure because the appeal was insufficiently reasoned.
BEK 2025 115 · sz (§ 40 Abs. 2 JG)
Appeal Dismissed for Insufficient Written Justification in Pre-Trial Detention Visit Denial
Used to decide not to enter into the merits of the appeal as a procedural decision by the President.
BEK 2025 94 · sz (§ 40 Abs. 2 JG)
Bankruptcy Proceedings Appeal Dismissal and Cost Ruling
The appeal procedure was closed due to withdrawal of the appeal.
STK 2025 14 · sz (§ 40 Abs. 2 JG)
Appellant Withdraws Appeal, Proceedings Dismissed
Cited implicitly as the procedural basis for dismissing the appeal due to withdrawal (mentioned in the reasoning section preceding the dispositive orders).
ZK1 2025 13 · sz (§ 40 Abs. 2 i.V.m. § 41 Abs. 1 JG)
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Divorce Judgment Modification
This provision justifies the decision being made by the presiding judge (preliminary decision).
BEK 2025 91 · sz (§§ 40 Abs. 2 und 41 Abs. 1 JG)
Appeal Dismissed for Insufficient Substantive Argumentation Against Wage Garnishment Rulings
The basis used for the non-admission of the appeal due to insufficient grounds.
STK 2025 15 · sz (§§ 40 Abs. 2 und 41 Abs. 1 JG)
Dismissal of Appeal for Failure to File Statement of Grounds
The appeal was dismissed as abandoned based on these cantonal procedural rules.
STK 2025 16 · sz (§§ 40 Abs. 2 und 41 Abs. 1 JG)
Failure to File Written Declaration of Appeal Leads to Dismissal
Cited as the basis for the presidential dismissal of the appeal due to the failure to file the statement of appeal.
STK 2025 17 · sz (§§ 40 Abs. 2 und 41 Abs. 1 JG)
Failure to File Statement of Appeal Constitutes Tacit Withdrawal
The appeal was dismissed (stricken off) based on these provisions because the appellant failed to file a formal statement of appeal after lodging the appeal notice.
BEK 2025 58 · sz (§ 40 Abs. 2 und § 41 Abs. 1 JG)
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely and Unsubstantiated Challenge to Theft/Appropriation Dismissal
Used as the basis for the presidential decision not to enter a finding on the insufficiently reasoned appeal.