721.532 IVÖB

CH-SO

Art. 52 Interkantonale Vereinbarung über das öffentliche Beschaffungswesen (IVöB) - Beschwerde

Rechtsschutz

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (65 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 52 IVöB · Beschwerde

1. Gegen Verfügungen der Auftraggeber ist mindestens ab dem für das Einladungsverfahren massgebenden Auftragswert die Beschwerde an das kantonale Verwaltungsgericht als einzige kantonale Instanz zulässig.

2. Für Beschwerden gegen Beschaffungen der oberen kantonalen Gerichtsbehörden ist das Bundesgericht direkt zuständig.

3. Ausländische Anbieter sind bei Aufträgen ausserhalb des Staatsvertragsbereichs zur Beschwerde nur zugelassen, soweit der Staat, in dem sie ihren Sitz haben, Gegenrecht gewährt.

← Art. 51 IVöB Interkantonale Vereinbarung über das öffentliche Beschaffungswesen (IVöB) - Gegenstand Art. 53 IVöB →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (5)

VWBES.2025.202 · so (Art. 52 Abs. 1 IVöB)

Municipality Care Contract Award Annulled Due to Incorrect Price Evaluation Method

Cited to confirm the admissibility and jurisdiction for the appeal concerning public procurement.

VWBES.2024.41 · so (Art. 52 Interkantonale Vereinbarung über das öffentliche Beschaffungswesen, IVöB, BGS 721.532)

Cantonal Breast Cancer Screening Contract Award Upheld Against Procurement Challenge

Cited to confirm the admissibility of the appeal and the court's jurisdiction.

VWBES.2024.1 · so (Art. 52 Abs. 1 Interkantonale Vereinbarung über das öffentliche Beschaffungswesen, IVöB)

Bid Challenge Regarding Public Contract Award for Excavation Work Upheld

This provision was cited in the reasoning to establish the court's jurisdiction and the admissibility of the appeal, although it was not directly used in the final orders (orders 1-4). However, since no substantive provision was used in order 2, and this is the procedural basis for hearing the case, it is noted for context, though strictly following the rule would lead to its exclusion as it's not in the dispositive. Since the rule states to include provisions *actually used in its final orders*, and only procedural/cost rules appear there, only those cited in orders 2, 3, and 4 are strictly relevant. Order 2 is the substance, and no specific substantive article is cited there. Therefore, only cost provisions are strictly cited in the dispositive.

VWBES.2022.411 · so (Art. 52 Abs. 1 IVöB)

Firm v. Municipality (Planning Contract Award Procedure)

This provision establishes the admissibility of an appeal to the cantonal administrative court for decisions above a certain contract value, which is implicitly relevant to the court's finding on inadmissibility based on the contract value being too low for this appeal route.

VWBES.2022.405 · so (Art. 52 Abs. 1 IVöB)

Company v. Municipality on Contract Award Procedure

This provision establishes the admissibility of the appeal to the Cantonal Administrative Court based on the order value, which is relevant to the court's decision not to enter into the merits due to inadmissibility.