311.1
CH-SO
§ 28 Gesetz über das kantonale Strafrecht und die Einführung des Schweizerischen Strafgesetzbuches - Unbefugtes Erbrechen von Verschlüssen oder Siegeln und Öffnen von Briefen oder Paketen
Das kantonale Strafrecht - Besondere Bestimmungen - Einzelne Übertretungen - Übertretungen gegen den öffentlichen Frieden
§ 28 Gesetz über das kantonale Strafrecht und die Einführung des Schweizerischen Strafgesetzbuches · Unbefugtes Erbrechen von Verschlüssen oder Siegeln und Öffnen von Briefen oder Paketen
1. Wer vorsätzlich und unbefugterweise Verschlüsse oder Siegel erbricht, Briefe oder Pakete öffnet, wird, sofern die Handlung nicht unter eine schwerere Strafbestimmung fällt, mit Busse bestraft.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (6)
PM/898/2022 · ge (art. 28 al. 1 DPMin)
Detainee Denied Conditional Release Over Unfavorable Prognosis Despite Positive Behavior
This provision sets the cumulative conditions for granting conditional release to a minor, which the court implicitly applied by confirming the rejection of the release based on the subjective condition.
D.cision.2019.1001 · vd (Art. 28 DPMin)
Conditional Release Appeal for Organized Theft and Trademark Violator
This article governs the conditions under which the execution authority may grant conditional release to a minor, which is the core subject matter addressed in the ruling.
D.cision.2017.449 · vd (Art. 28 DPMin)
Appeal of Refusal of Conditional Release Despite Good Conduct
The court ultimately rejected the appeal, implicitly confirming the decision based on the criteria defined in this article regarding conditional release for minors.
D.cision.2013.912 · vd (Art. 28 DPMin)
Minor's Appeal of Conditional Release Denial Upheld Due to Non-Compliance
This article sets the substantive condition for granting conditional release, which was the primary subject of the appeal.
D.cision.2012.239 · vd (Art. 28 DPMin)
Appeal Against Denial of Conditional Release for Serious Offender
This article governed the substantive criteria for granting conditional release, which was the core issue of the appeal, although the appeal was ultimately rejected based on the facts interpreted under this article.
D.cision.2011.402 · vd (Art. 28 DPMin)
Appellant's Challenge to Denial of Conditional Release Based on Lack of Counsel and High Recidivism Risk
The court rejected the appeal, confirming the lower court's decision which was based on the criteria for conditional release under this article.