831.301
CH-SH
CH-SH
§ 20 Verordnung über Ergänzungsleistungen zur AHV und IV - Hilfsmittel und Hilfsgeräte; Abklärung
Krankheits- und Behinderungskosten
§ 20 Verordnung über Ergänzungsleistungen zur AHV und IV · Hilfsmittel und Hilfsgeräte; Abklärung
1. Wo es zweifelhaft erscheint, ob ein Hilfsmittel oder Hilfsgerät notwendig oder dessen Ausführung einfach und zweckmässig ist, hat die oder der Versicherte die Bescheinigung einer Ärztin oder eines Arztes, einer Spezialstelle für Invalidenhilfe oder einer Beschäftigungstherapiestelle beizubringen.
2. Die Kosten für die Abklärungen gelten als Kosten im Sinne von Art. 14 Abs. 1 lit. f des Bundesgesetzes.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (19)
II 2024 107 · sz (Art. 20 Abs. 1 ELV i.V.m. Art. 67 Abs. 1 der Verordnung über die Alters- und Hinterlassenenversicherung [AHVV; SR 831.1010] vom 31.10.1947)
Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefit Denial Due to Asset Valuation of Partially Rented Property
Cited to support the finding that the spouse is entitled to file a claim for EL benefits on behalf of the insured person.
ZL.2023.00020 · zh (Art. 20 Abs. 1 ELV)
Applicant v. Administrative Body on Duty to Investigate Benefits Eligibility
Cited in the reasoning regarding the requirement for a written application for supplementary benefits.
ZL.2023.00020 · zh (Art. 20 Abs. 2 ELV)
Applicant v. Administrative Body on Duty to Investigate Benefits Eligibility
Cited in the reasoning regarding the content of the application form.
II 2019 18 · sz (Art. 20 Abs. 1 Satz 1 der Verordnung über die Ergänzungsleistungen zur Alters-, Hinterlassenen- und Invalidenversicherung [ELV])
Applicant v. Social Security Office: Retroactive Start Date for Supplementary Disability Benefits
Cited in the reasoning, but not in the dispositive orders.
II 2019 18 · sz (Art. 20 Abs. 2 ELV)
Applicant v. Social Security Office: Retroactive Start Date for Supplementary Disability Benefits
Cited in the reasoning, but not in the dispositive orders.
EL.2016.30 · sg (Art. 20 Abs. 2 ELV)
Administrative Body's Procedural Error in Benefit Application Review
The context of this provision was used to establish that the administrative body acted wrongfully by issuing a non-entry decision when substantive requirements had already been examined.
EL.2016.30 · sg (Art. 20 Abs. 2 ELV)
Benefits Application Reinstatement Due to Procedural Error
The court ruled that the non-entry decision was unlawful because the agency had already factually dealt with the matter, which relates to the requirements for the application form defined in this provision.
EL.2015.23 · sg (Art. 20 ELV)
Applicant's Right to Supplementary Benefits Application Consideration After Initial Submission
Cited in the reasoning to establish that the required entry condition (submission of the application form) was met, justifying the reversal of the non-entry decision.
EL.2015.23 · sg (Art. 20 ELV)
Applicant v. Executing Authority on Duty to Cooperate and Entry into Supplementary Benefits Proceedings
Cited in the reasoning concerning the fulfilment of the entry requirements through the submission of the application form.
VSBES.2016.154 · so (Art. 20 Abs. 1 Verordnung über die Ergänzungsleistungen zur Alters-, Hinterlassenen- und Invalidenversicherung [ELV, SR 831.301] in Verbindung mit Art. 67 Abs. 1 Verordnung über die Alters- und Hinterlassenenversicherung [AHVV, SR 831.101])
Supplementary Benefits Retroactive Claim Denial
These articles, concerning the requirements for filing an application, are cited in the reasoning section related to the core issue of entitlement, though not strictly required by the final orders based on the exclusion rule, they inform the substantive finding.
S 2015 140 · gr (Art. 20 ELV)
Benefit Recipient Retroactive Payment Deadline Appeal
Cited in the reasoning to explain the requirement of a completely filled and signed official application form for supplementary benefits.
ZL.2014.00022 · zh (Art. 20 ELV)
Domicile Determination for Supplementary Benefits Following Clinic Stay
Cited in the reasoning phase which supports the main decision regarding the relevant time period.
ZL.2012.00041 · zh (Art. 20 Abs. 1 der Verordnung über die Ergänzungsleistungen zur Alters-, Hinterlassenen- und Invalidenversicherung (ELV))
Disability Pension Appeal: Imputed Income and Spousal Contribution
Cited in connection with the legitimacy of the spouse to file an objection, although the primary reason for remittal is procedural.
ZL.2011.00091 · zh (Art. 20 Abs. 1 ELV)
Appeal Regarding Imputed Spousal Income and Failure to Allow Labor Market Re-entry Period
Cited in the reasoning regarding the start date of the supplementary benefit claim, which informs the scope of the re-evaluation.
EL.2010.7 · sg (Art. 20 Abs. 1 ELV)
Appeal Dismissed: Untimely Application for Retroactive Benefits Despite Legal Representation
Cited in the reasoning section (point 7.3) regarding the requirement for an application, supporting the decision against retroactive entitlement.