§ 6 Verordnung über den Vollzug der eidgenössischen Epidemiengesetzgebung (Kantonale Epidemienverordnung, EPV) - Zuständigkeit

CON 2020 8 · ju (Art. 6 al. 1 LEp)

Mandatory Mask Ordinance Upheld

Cited as the legal basis for the Federal Council to declare a particular situation for epidemic control.

CON 2020 8 · ju (Art. 6 al. 2 LEp)

Mandatory Mask Ordinance Upheld

Cited as the legal basis for the Federal Council to order measures affecting the population in a particular situation, and for delegating powers to cantons.

SK 2023 380 · be (Art. 6 EpG)

Swiss Court Upholds Fine Against Fitness Operator for COVID-19 Violations

Cited in the dispositive section as a legal basis concerning the relevant ordinance/law on combating transmissible diseases.

A/2091/2022 · ge (Art. 6 al. 2 let. b LEP)

Company Appeal Regarding Denial of Short-Time Work Compensation

Cited in the reasoning regarding the definition of a 'particular situation' due to COVID-19, but not explicitly mentioned in the dispositive orders.

SU210042 · zh (Art. 6 Abs. 2 lit. b EpG)

Failure to Wear Face Mask Appeal

This article is cited as part of the legal basis for the conviction regarding non-compliance with a measure.

VG.2021.3 · bs (Art. 6 Abs. 2 lit. b EpG)

Student Challenge to University COVID Certificate Requirement

Cited in the reasoning regarding the conditions under which the Federal Council can order measures during a special situation.

SK 2022 152 · be (Art. 6 Abs. 2 Bst. b EpG)

Failure to Wear Mask on Public Transport and Refusal to Present Exemption

Cited in the dispositive alongside the Covid-19 ordinance provisions as part of the legal basis for the conviction.

SU210050 · zh (Art. 6c Abs. 2 der Covid-19-Verordnung besondere Lage in der Fassung vom 29. Oktober 2020 in Verbindung mit Art. 83 Abs. 1 lit. j EpG, Art. 6 Abs. 2 lit. b EpG und Art. 40 Abs. 2 EpG)

COVID-19 Mask Mandate Violation During Demonstration Upheld

This is the legal basis for the conviction for not wearing a face mask during a political gathering.

28556 · nw (Art. 83 Abs. 1 lit. j in Verbindung mit Art. 40 Abs. 2 lit. b und Art. 6 Abs. 2 lit. b EpG i.V.m. Art. 3a Abs. 1 Covid-19-Verordnung besondere Lage)

Appellant v. State: Mask Mandate Compliance and Interpretation of Public Health Regulations

This provision forms the basis for finding the appellant guilty of the offense (unauthorized non-wearing of a face mask).

SK 2021 516 · be (Art. 6 Abs. 2 Bst. b EpG)

Federal Public Transport Security Act Violation Upheld for Mask Refusal

Cited as part of the overall legal framework supporting the decision, relating to the authorities to issue the underlying ordinance.

GE.2021.0245 · vd (art. 6 LEp)

Parental Appeal of Mandatory Omicron Quarantine Dismissed

Cited in the reasoning concerning the conditions under which cantonal authorities have competence.

GE.2021.0245 · vd (art. 6 al. 2 let. a et b LEp)

Parental Appeal of Mandatory Omicron Quarantine Dismissed

Cited in the reasoning as the basis for the COVID-19 situation particulière ordinance.

4M 21 70 · lu (Art. 6 Abs. 2 lit. b EpG)

Federal Mask Mandate Violation Punishment under Epidemics Act

This provision is cited in conjunction with Art. 40 EpG to establish the Federal Council's competence to issue measures against the population during a special situation, which are then covered by the penal provision.

SU210044 · zh (Art. 6 Abs. 2 lit. b EpG)

Appellant v. State: Validity of Mask Mandate Fine Under Legality Principle

This provision is cited in conjunction with Art. 83 Abs. 1 lit. j EpG as the basis for the conviction in order 1.

SU210034 · zh (Art. 3a Abs. 1 der Covid-19-Verordnung besondere Lage in der Fassung vom 15. August 2020 in Verbindung mit Art. 83 Abs. 1 lit. j EpG, Art. 6 Abs. 2 lit. b EpG und Art. 40 Abs. 2 EpG)

COVID-19 Mask Mandate and Security Order Violation Upheld

This provision is cited as the basis for the guilty verdict regarding the violation of the mask mandate.