Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
741.013 N4 CH-SH

Art. 10 Vereinbarung zwischen den Kantonen Zürich und Schaffhausen über die Ausübung der Polizeidienste auf der Nationalstrasse 4 (N4), Schaffhausen-Winterthur, Abschnitt Flurlingen - Disziplinargewalt

Stellung der Angehörigen der Polizei Schaffhausen
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (18 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 10 Vereinbarung zwischen den Kantonen Zürich und Schaffhausen über die Ausübung der Polizeidienste auf der Nationalstrasse 4 (N4), Schaffhausen-Winterthur, Abschnitt Flurlingen · Disziplinargewalt

1. Die Angehörigen der Polizei Schaffhausen unterstehen der Disziplinargewalt des Stammkantons. Disziplinarfehler, die im Gebietskanton begangen wurden, sind den Vorgesetzten der Fehlbaren zu melden.

← Art. 9 Vereinbarung zwischen den Kantonen Zürich und Schaffhausen über die Ausübung der Polizeidienste auf der Nationalstrasse 4 (N4), Schaffhausen-Winterthur, Abschnitt Flurlingen Verantwortlichkeit der Polizei Schaffhausen Art. 11 Vereinbarung zwischen den Kantonen Zürich und Schaffhausen über die Ausübung der Polizeidienste auf der Nationalstrasse 4 (N4), Schaffhausen-Winterthur, Abschnitt Flurlingen →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (11)

CPEN.2022.55 · ne (art. 10 OCCR)
Appeal Dismissal for Untimely Filing and Merits of Refusal to Drug Test
Cited in the final orders as a procedural basis relevant to the initial justification for preliminary checks, as mentioned in the lower court's judgment confirmed by this decision.
2021.06.29.sr.3 · bl (Art. 10 Abs. 2 SKV)
Unlawful Drug Test and Sample Order Due to Insufficient Grounds
Cited as the provision governing preliminary drug tests, requiring concrete signs of impairment not solely due to alcohol.
D.cision.2020.495 · vd (Art. 10 ss OCCR)
State v. Defendant Regarding Compelled Bodily Examinations
Cited in the heading, relevant to the context of preliminary drug testing procedures, though the specific order annulled was the blood test.
2020.05.13.sr.1 · bl (Art. 10 Abs. 2 SKV)
Driver's Costs for Illegally Ordered Drug Test Remitted
Cited in relation to the possibility of conducting preliminary tests for drugs or medications when there are indications of driving under the influence.
SK 2018 542 · be (Art. 10 Abs. 2 SKV)
Acquittal Upheld for Refusal of Urine Test Following Admission of CBD Use
Cited regarding preliminary tests (like the Mahsan test) for detecting narcotics.
SK 2017 291 · be (Art. 10 Abs. 2 SKV)
Refusal to Undergo Drug Test Constitutes Traffic Law Violation
This provision was cited as the legal basis justifying the police's authority to order the preliminary drug test (Vortest).
501 2015 153 · fr (art. 10 OCCR)
State v. Driver (Inadmissible Drug Evidence)
Cited in the context of procedural violation regarding the initial stop and preliminary tests for narcotics.
501 2015 153 · fr (art. 10 al. 4 OCCR)
State v. Driver (Inadmissible Drug Evidence)
Cited in relation to the conditions under which a blood test could be ordered, which were not met.
2014.04.15.sr.1 · bl (Art. 10 Abs. 2 SKV)
DUI Test Refusal Conviction Upheld, Probation Assistance Reversed
Cited as a legal basis for conducting drug tests, which are relevant to the charge of thwarting measures to determine fitness to drive.
460.2013.279 · bl (Art. 10 Abs. 2 SKV)
Defendant Convicted of Obstruction, Emission Test Failure, and Insult Upheld, Probation Assistance Overturned
Cited in the dispositive in conjunction with Art. 91a Abs. 1 SVG for the conviction regarding the obstruction of measures to determine unfitness to drive.
17.2019.2 · ti (art. 10 OCCS)
Applicant v. State: Final Penal Order Revision for DUI Test Procedure
This article is cited as part of the legal framework concerning breathalyzer tests relevant to the case.