412.101
CH-SH
CH-SH
§ 11 Verordnung zum Einführungsgesetz zum Berufsbildungsgesetz - Ausbildungsplätze
Berufliche Grundausbildung - Berufliche Grundbildung - Allgemeine Vorschriften
§ 11 Verordnung zum Einführungsgesetz zum Berufsbildungsgesetz · Ausbildungsplätze
1. Die Abteilung Berufsbildung betreibt ein Lehrstellenmarketing und trifft in Zusammenarbeit mit den Organisationen der Arbeitswelt geeignete Massnahmen zur Schaffung von Lehrstellen, um ein möglichst ausreichendes und bedarfsgerechtes Angebot an Ausbildungsplätzen im Bereich der beruflichen Grundbildung zu erlangen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (12)
GE.2020.0240 · vd (art. 11 al. 1 OFPr)
Revocation of Hairdressing Training Authorization Upheld for Persistent Violations
This provision regarding the maximum number of apprentices based on staff qualification was implicitly used as the basis for the initial authorization and its subsequent withdrawal regarding the conditions of training.
III.1.2018.3 · sg (Art. 11 Abs. 1 BBV)
Vocational Training Permit Revocation Overturned Due to Insufficient Investigation and Denial of Right to Be Heard
This article provides the legal basis for the refusal or withdrawal of the educational license if the practical education is insufficient or requirements are not met, forming the background for the revoked decision.
III.1.2018.3 · sg (Art. 11 Abs. 1 BBV (SR 412.101))
Farm Operator v. Administrative Appeals Commission (Vocational Training Authorization Revocation)
Although cited in the header, the ultimate reason for success is rooted in procedural and constitutional grounds as demonstrated in the dispositive.
B.2014.165 · sg (Art. 11 Abs. 1 BBV)
Appeal Regarding Vocational Training Program for Gifted Athletes Remanded for Competent Authority Ruling
Cited in the reasoning regarding the conditions for refusing an education permit due to insufficient practical training, which the remand must address.
B.2014.165 · sg (Art. 11 Abs. 1 BBV)
Appeal Regarding Authorization Denial for Gifted Athlete Education Program
Cited as the provision under which the competent authority (Amt für Berufsbildung) must review the training program's practical education component when issuing the permit.
RRB.Nr.2013.000481 · ag (Art. 11 Abs. 1 BBV)
Cantonal Discretion Over Apprentices' Vocational School Choice, Especially Block Courses
Details the supervision requirements for vocational training institutions, impacting the court's assessment of the vocational training school.
GE.2010.0228 · vd (art. 11 al. 1 OFPr)
Withdrawal of Apprenticeship Training Authorization Upheld Due to Non-Attendance at Mandatory Courses
This article provided the legal basis for the administrative authority to withdraw the authorization to train apprentices, which the court upheld.
GE.2010.0159 · vd (art. 11 al. 1 OFPr)
Pharmacy Training Authorization Withdrawal Upheld
This provision concerning insufficient professional practice training was cited as a ground for the decision being maintained.
GE.2010.0083 · vd (art. 11 al. 1 OFPr)
Appeal Against Revocation of Motorcycle Mechanic Training Authorization Due to Procedural Defect
Cited by the administrative authority as the substantive basis for withdrawing the authorization, although the court ultimately annulled the decision on procedural grounds.
GE.2009.0130 · vd (art. 11 al. 1 OFPr)
Withdrawal of Retail Management Training Authorization Upheld Due to Insufficient Supervision and Misconduct
Cited in the reasoning as the legal basis for the withdrawal of the authorization, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders. Therefore, it must be excluded based on the rules.
TA.2009.338 · ne (Art. 11 al.1 OFPr)
Hairdresser v. Professional Training Service: Right to be Heard Violation in Apprentice Authorization Revocation
Cited as the specific basis allowing the cantonal authority to withdraw the authorization to train if the professional practice training is insufficient or obligations are breached.
GE.2007.0082 · vd (Art. 11 al. 1 OFPr)
Vocational Training Authority v. Foundation on Employee Personal Integrity
The court confirmed the decision to withdraw the authorization to train apprentices based on this provision, as the employer violated its obligations to protect the personality of the apprentices.