Art. 1 Interkantonale Vereinbarung über das öffentliche Beschaffungswesen (IVöB) - Gegenstand

60/2023/11 · sh (Art. 1 Abs. 3 lit. b IVöB)

Public Tender Award Challenge Concerning Timeliness, Evaluation Criteria, and Incomplete Bidding

Cited in conjunction with the requirement that evaluation must comply with announced award criteria.

60/2023/11 · sh (Art. 1 Abs. 3 lit. c IVöB)

Public Tender Award Challenge Concerning Timeliness, Evaluation Criteria, and Incomplete Bidding

Cited in conjunction with the requirement that evaluation must comply with the principle of equal treatment.

60/2003/50 · sh (Art. 1 Abs. 3 lit. b IVöB)

Procuring Entity's Award Decision Upheld After Cured Reasoning on Lower Out-of-Canton Bid

Cited in the reasoning as part of the legal basis for the principle of non-discrimination/equal treatment in public procurement.

60/2003/55 · sh (Art. 1 Abs. 3 IVöB)

Municipal Procurement Dispute: Unannounced Evaluation Criteria Change and Contract Award Timing

Cited as the basis for the requirement of transparency in the tendering procedure.

60/2016/29 · sh (Art. 1 Abs. 3 lit. b IVöB)

Award Authority Violated Transparency by Penalizing Key Personnel Based on Age

The court found that the principle of equal treatment of bidders (Gleichbehandlung) was violated.

60/2018/45 · sh (Art. 1 Abs. 3 lit. c IVöB)

School Furniture Procurement Award Overturned Due to Insufficient Documentation and Flawed Evaluation Methodology

Cited as violated regarding the transparency requirement due to the applied evaluation method.

60/2019/17 · sh (Art. 1 Abs. 3 lit. b IVöB)

Procurement Award Overturned Due to Non-Conforming Technical Specification and Lack of Capability

Cited to show that granting the contract to the non-conforming bid violated the principle of equal treatment in procurement law.

60/2019/3 · sh (Art. 1 Abs. 3 lit. c IVöB)

Procurement Transparency Violation via Post-Submission Score Increase

This provision is cited in the introductory section (heading) regarding the requirements for public procurement that the court considered relevant to the transparency principle violation.

60/2019/27 · sh (Art. 1 Abs. 3 lit. a IVöB)

Tender Exclusion Discretion vs. Mandatory Criteria Fulfillment

This provision concerning the promotion of effective competition was cited in the context of justifying the KSD's check on non-fulfilled 'must-criteria'.

60/2019/27 · sh (Art. 1 Abs. 3 lit. b IVöB)

Tender Exclusion Discretion vs. Mandatory Criteria Fulfillment

This provision concerning the principle of effective competition was cited in relation to the final assessment where the failure to meet criterion 147 did not violate equal treatment.

60/2019/27 · sh (Art. 1 Abs. 3 lit. c IVöB)

Tender Exclusion Discretion vs. Mandatory Criteria Fulfillment

This provision concerning the transparency requirement was cited when justifying the KSD's check on non-fulfilled 'must-criteria'.

60/2014/14 · sh (Art. 1 Abs. 3 lit. c IVöB)

Improper Inclusion of Lifecycle Costs in Tender Evaluation

Cited as part of the legal framework related to the violation of the principle of transparency.

60/2017/17 · sh (Art. 1 Abs. 3 lit. b und lit. c IVöB)

Unsuccessful Bidder Lacked Standing to Challenge Award Without Demonstrating Realistic Chance of Securing Contract

Cited in the reasoning section regarding the principles of equal treatment and transparency in public procurement, which informed the court's assessment of the process validity.

60/2018/7 · sh (Art. 1 Abs. 3 lit. b IVöB)

Procurement Award Based on Unqualified Apprentice Training Criterion

Cited in the reasoning when discussing the need for non-discriminatory interpretation of the apprenticeship criterion for domestic providers, though the final order itself is based on the non-recognition of the Vorlehre.