963.75
HONO
CH-SG
Art. 16 Honorarordnung (HonO) - c) Summarisches Verfahren
II. Honorarbemessung - 1. Honorar nach Streitwert
Art. 16 HonO · c) Summarisches Verfahren
1. Im summarischen Verfahren wird das mittlere Honorar auf 10 bis 60 Prozent herabgesetzt.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (12)
BES.2017.58 · sg (Art. 14 Abs. 1 lit. e i.V.m. Art. 16 Abs. 1 HonO)
Debtor's Representative Standing and Ex Officio Compensation in Debt Enforcement Appeal
This provision formed the basis for the lower court's initial determination of the fee at 15% of the standard fee, which was subsequently reviewed.
BES.2017.58 · sg (Art. 16 Abs. 1 HonO)
Debtor's Representative Standing and Ex Officio Compensation in Debt Enforcement Appeal
Cited in the context of the standard reduction range for fees in summary proceedings.
BES.2017.58 · sg (Art. 14 Abs. 1 lit. e i.V.m. Art. 16 Abs. 1 HonO)
Appeal Concerning Party Compensation Award in Debt Enforcement Proceedings
This provision was the basis used by the lower court, and implicitly confirmed by the final decision, to calculate the party compensation at 15% of the standard fee in summary proceedings.
BES.2017.58 · sg (Art. 16 HonO)
Appeal Concerning Party Compensation Award in Debt Enforcement Proceedings
This article, which allows for a reduction of the standard fee to between 10% and 50% in summary proceedings, was cited as the basis for the initial calculation approach.
B.2018.93 · sg (Art. 9, 16, 22 Abs. 1 lit. b und 28bis der Honorarordnung für Rechtsanwältinnen und Rechtsanwälte; sGS 963.75, HonO)
Procurement Challenge: Flawed Reference Score Calculation Invalidates Award
Cited to determine the amount of the fee awarded to the appellant for the appeal proceedings.
B.2017.154 · sg (Art. 9, 16, 22 Abs. 1 Ingress und lit. b und 28bis der Honorarordnung für Rechtsanwältinnen und Rechtsanwälte, sGS 963.75, HonO)
Annulment of IT Services Contract Award Due to Non-Compliant Consortium Bid
Cited to determine the amount of the extra-procedural compensation awarded to the appellant.
B.2017.154 · sg (Art. 9, 16, 22 Abs. 1 Ingress und lit. b und 28bis der Honorarordnung für Rechtsanwältinnen und Rechtsanwälte, sGS 963.75, HonO)
Bietergemeinschaft Submission Violation in Public Procurement
Cited as the basis for compensating the appellant for the appeal proceedings.
HG.2011.286 · sg (Art. 14 lit. e, Art. 15, Art. 16, Art. 28bis und Art. 29 HonO)
Shower Toilet Non-Compete Injunction Granted Pending Main Action
Cited for determining the amount of the party compensation.
HG.2011.10.02 · sg (Art. 16 HonO)
Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition Regarding Coffee Capsule Shape and Slogans
Cited in the reasoning for setting the party compensation (Order 7).
HG.2011.10.02 · sg (Art. 14 lit. f, Art. 15, Art. 16, Art. 28bis und Art. 29 HonO)
Coffee Capsule Shape Infringement and Comparative Advertising Dispute
Used to determine the amount of the party compensation, which is imposed in Orders 6 and 7.
RZ.2008.59 · sg (Art. 16 Abs. 1 HonO)
Provisional Evidence Denial and Procedural Error Cured on Appeal
Used when reviewing and ultimately upholding the amount of the party costs awarded to the opposing party.
RZ.2008.59 · sg (Art. 3, 14, 16 Abs. 1 und 17 HonO)
Appeal Regarding Provisional Evidence for Retroactive Inventory Valuation Dismissed
These honorarium rules were applied to review the reduction and reasonableness of the opposing party's attorney's fees.