Art. 15 Honorarordnung (HonO) - b) Verfahren vor Handelsgericht und Kantonsgericht

KV.Z.2014.13 · sg (Art. 15 HonO)

Claimant v. Health Insurer (Sickness Benefits Calculation)

Cited in the reasoning concerning the increase of the attorney fee because the Insurance Court acts as the first instance court in these disputes.

KV.Z.2014.6 · sg (Art. 15 HonO)

Claimant v. Insurer: Unusual Exclusion Clause and Disability Capital Entitlement

Cited in the reasoning to justify increasing the calculated fee because the Insurance Court acts as the first instance court.

KV.Z.2013.17 · sg (Art. 15 HonO)

Sickness Daily Allowance Entitlement and Set-Off of Overpaid Benefits

Applied because the Insurance Court acts as the first instance in these disputes, justifying an increase in the attorney's fee.

KV.Z.2015.3 · sg (Art. 15 HonO)

Insured v. Insurer: Disability Benefits Resumption

Cited in reasoning (4.4) regarding the applicable fee schedule for calculating the successful party's legal costs.

KV.Z.2015.3 · sg (Art. 15 Abs. 1 und Art. 28bis Abs. 1 HonO)

Insured Entitled to Disability Payments Despite Insurer's Rejection

Cited in E. 4.4 (Art. 15 analog) as part of the basis for awarding party compensation.

KV.Z.2015.3 · sg (Art. 15 HonO)

Insured Entitled to Disability Payments Despite Insurer's Rejection

Cited in E. 4.4 (analogous application) as part of the basis for awarding party compensation.

KV.Z.2013.3 · sg (Art. 15 HonO)

Sickness Benefit Claim Jurisdiction and Evidentiary Standards

Cited in the reasoning (E. 7.2.2) regarding the required increase of the party compensation rate applicable to the Insurance Court when deciding on supplementary health insurance disputes, relevant to order 3.

KV.Z.2013.6 · sg (Art. 15 HonO)

Insurer Prematurely Terminated Disability Benefits Before Exhaustion of Treatment Options

Cited for the upward adjustment of the standard attorney fee because the Insurance Court acted as the court of first instance.

HG.2011.286 · sg (Art. 14 lit. e, Art. 15, Art. 16, Art. 28bis und Art. 29 HonO)

Shower Toilet Non-Compete Injunction Granted Pending Main Action

Cited for determining the amount of the party compensation.

HG.2011.10.02 · sg (Art. 15 HonO)

Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition Regarding Coffee Capsule Shape and Slogans

Cited in the reasoning for setting the party compensation (Order 7).

HG.2011.10.02 · sg (Art. 14 lit. f, Art. 15, Art. 16, Art. 28bis und Art. 29 HonO)

Coffee Capsule Shape Infringement and Comparative Advertising Dispute

Used to determine the amount of the party compensation, which is imposed in Orders 6 and 7.