951.1
VRP
CH-SG
CH-SG
Art. 90 Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRP) - Frist
Dritter Teil: Rechtsschutz in Verwaltungsstreitsachen - F. Rechtsverweigerungsbeschwerde
Art. 90 VRP · Frist
1. Die Rechtsverweigerungsbeschwerde ist zulässig innert dreissig Tagen, nachdem der Betroffene vom Beschwerdegrund Kenntnis erhalten hat.
2. Die Beschwerde, mit der die ungerechtfertigte Verzögerung einer Amtshandlung geltend gemacht wird, ist an keine Frist gebunden.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (17)
B.2023.109 · sg (Art. 90 Abs. 1 VRP)
Administrative Department Mandated to Rule on Optional Referendum Complaint Regarding Property Sale Valuation
Cited to confirm the timely filing of the appeal based on the date the appellant received notice of the contested decision.
B.2023.62 · sg (Art. 90 Abs. 1 VRP)
Road Asphalting Appeal Timeliness and Exhaustion of Remedies
This provision established the 30-day time limit for lodging a complaint regarding a denial of justice, which was the main procedural point of contention.
B.2023.62 · sg (Art. 90 Abs. 2 VRP)
Road Asphalting Appeal Timeliness and Exhaustion of Remedies
Cited to contrast the situation of a delay in justice, which is not time-bound, with the denial of justice.
B.2023.62 · sg (Art. 90 Abs. 1 VRP)
Municipality Road Paving Delay vs. Denial of Recourse Deadline
This provision establishes the 30-day time limit for filing a complaint regarding refusal of legal action, which was central to the decision on whether the initial complaint was time-barred.
B.2023.62 · sg (Art. 90 Abs. 2 VRP)
Municipality Road Paving Delay vs. Denial of Recourse Deadline
This provision, which distinguishes delay from refusal and notes that delay is not time-bound, was used to explain the significance of the distinction made in Art. 88 Abs. 2 lit. a VRP.
23.1310 · sg (Art. 90 Abs. 1 VRP)
Partial Grant of Access and Traffic Injunction
This article was discussed in the reasoning concerning the deadline for filing the appeal, leading to the conclusion that the appeal was admissible as a case of unjustified delay (Art. 90 Abs. 2 VRP).
23.1310 · sg (Art. 90 Abs. 2 VRP)
Partial Grant of Access and Traffic Injunction
This provision was applied to admit the appeal because the issue was treated as an unjustified delay of official action, which is not subject to a time limit.
22.5920 · sg (Art. 90 Abs. 1 VRP)
Property Owner v. Authority Regarding Street Widening Refusal Timeliness
The appeal was not entered upon because it was filed too late according to the deadline set in this provision for formal refusal of legal action.
B.2022.119 · sg (Art. 90 Abs. 1 VRP)
Competence for Preliminary Planning Decision
Used to confirm that the appeal treated as a Rechtsverweigerungsbeschwerde was filed within the required 30-day deadline after gaining knowledge of the grounds for complaint.
19.3351 · sg (Art. 90 Abs. 2 VRP)
Property Owner v. Municipal Council Regarding Development Plan Amendment Delay
The procedural rule specifying that a complaint concerning unjustified delay in official action is not subject to a time limit was applied to admit the appeal.
19.3351 · sg (Art. 90 Abs. 2 VRP)
Property Owner v. Municipal Council (Development Plan Review Delay)
Cited to establish that the appeal concerning unjustified delay was not subject to a time limit.
18.3277 · sg (Art. 90 Abs. 2 VRP)
Administrative Delay Dismissal in Rezoning Due to New Planning Act Implementation Timeline
Cited in the reasoning (Erwägung 1) to justify that the appeal against unjustified delay is not subject to a time limit.
B.2017.176 · sg (Art. 90 Abs. 2 VRP)
Appeal Against Refusal to Order Restoration of Unpermitted Structures on Agricultural Land
The appeal was deemed timely because it was treated as a case of unjustified delay, meaning it was not subject to a deadline.
B.2017.176 · sg (Art. 90 Abs. 2 VRP)
Administrative Delay vs. Formal Refusal in Land Restoration Appeal
This provision was used to conclude that the appeal based on delay in proceedings was not bound by a time limit.
B.2017.131 · sg (Art. 90 Abs. 1 VRP)
Data Protection Access After Disciplinary File Closure
This provision was cited in the reasoning regarding the admissibility and deadlines for the appeal, which supported the decision to enter the merits (implicitly supporting order 1).