Art. 66 Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRP) - Massgebliche Vorschriften

B.2022.182 · sg (Art. 66 Abs. 1 VRP)

Day Care Noise Complaint Remand Upheld Against Bias Claim

Cited in the reasoning for costs, corresponding to order 2.

B.2022.182 · sg (Art. 66 al. 1 VRP)

Day Care Noise Complaint Remand Upheld Against Bias Claim

Cited in the reasoning for costs, corresponding to order 2.

KSCHG.2020.1 · sg (Art. 66 des Gesetzes über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege [VRP; sGS 951.1])

Jurisdictional Dispute Over Medical Cost Reimbursement

Cited as a procedural rule governing the transfer of the case to the competent jurisdiction.

KSCHG.2020.1 · sg (Art. 66 des Gesetzes über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRP))

Jurisdictional Dispute Over Healthcare Services Location

This procedural provision is cited in conjunction with Art. 89 Abs. 5 KVG for the transfer of the case.

BV.2021.9 · sg (Art. 66 VRP)

Pension Fund Liability for Disability Benefits Based on Pre-Coverage Incapacity Onset

Cited in the context of the court not being bound by the parties' motions regarding the determination of the benefit amount.

BV.2021.9 · sg (Art. 66 in Verbindung mit 56 Abs. 1 VRP)

Pension Fund Disability Benefit Liability Determination

Cited as the basis for the court's decision-making power regarding the parties' requests (Dispositionsmaxime).

B.2020.181 · sg (Art. 66 Abs. 2 VRP (not explicitly cited in dispositive, but related to costs in the general procedure))

Fitness to Drive Assessment Upheld Due to Alcohol-Related Incidents

Costs are regulated by order 2, which imposes them on the appellant, citing provisions related to admissibility/procedure (VRP articles) for the outcome.

B.2020.103.B.2020.1 · sg (Art. 66 Abs. 1 VRP)

Taxpayer Fails to Substantiate Cash Expenses, Court Denies Extension for Incomplete Appeal

The decision orders costs in order 4, which generally relies on this provision for cost imposition in cantonal administrative proceedings, even if not explicitly cited in the numbered orders, it is implicit in order 4, but since the instruction asks only for *explicitly cited* provisions in the dispositive, and order 4 only mentions 'amtlichen Kosten' without citing the specific article, no cost/aid article is extractable unless order 4 had cited one explicitly, e.g., Art. 66 Abs. 1 VRP. *Self-correction: Order 4 only states the imposition of costs, it does not cite the legal basis for imposing costs itself.*

B.2019.95 · sg (Art. 66 al. 1 VRP)

Municipality Appeal Regarding Classification of Culverted Watercourses as Public and Surface Waters

This provision concerns the allocation of court costs, which is addressed in Dispositive 2 (though the specific article for cost allocation/waiver is not cited in the dispositive text itself, only the outcome is given). Since no specific cost article *is* cited in the dispositive, nothing for costs can be included based on the strict rule, even though costs are addressed.

B.2019.46 · sg (Art. 66 Abs. 1 VRP)

Revocation of Residency Permit for Sham Marriage

This provision governs costs, but is not explicitly cited in the operative part (order 2) which refers only to the amount of the costs (CHF 2'000).

B.2017.186 · sg (Art. 66 VRP)

Appeal Against Replacement Bridge Project Approval Dismissed

This provision is not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders (1, 2, 3). If it were, it would be included here as the cost provision.

IV.2018.250 · sg (Art. 66 VRP)

Epilepsy Causation and Duty to Investigate in Disability Insurance Claim

This provision governs the decision on court costs, leading to the imposition of costs on the respondent.

B.2017.6 · sg (Art. 66 VRP)

Appeal Against Reduction of Special School Depreciation Financing

Order 2 mandates the Vorinstanz to pay costs of CHF 2'000 and refund the deposit, but the operative section 2 does not explicitly cite the article regulating costs.

B.2017.6 · sg (Art. 66 des Gesetzes über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRP))

Appeal Against Reduction of Special School Depreciation Financing

Implied in the cost order (Order 2), but the provided text cites specific VRP articles regarding admissibility and procedure in E. 1, and cites the specific cost order in E. 4.3 (Art. 64 in Verbindung mit Art. 56 Abs. 2 VRP) to justify the outcome, not the cost attribution itself, which is stated in Order 2 without explicit citation of the cost article.

B.2016.185 · sg (Art. 66 Abs. 1 VRP)

Property Owner's Flood Insurance Appeal Dismissed Over Expert Findings

Cited in the dispositive order regarding costs.