951.1
VRP
CH-SG
CH-SG
Art. 63 Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRP) - Entscheid
Dritter Teil: Rechtsschutz in Verwaltungsstreitsachen - C. Beschwerde
Art. 63 VRP · Entscheid
1. Das Verwaltungsgericht darf über die Begehren des Beschwerdeführers nicht hinausgehen und die angefochtene Verfügung oder den angefochtenen Entscheid nicht zu dessen Nachteil ändern.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (30)
B.2022.69 · sg (Art. 63 VRP)
Competitive Authority v. Municipality on Procurement Award
While cited in the reasoning regarding the principle of disposition, it is not explicitly mentioned in the dispositive orders 1, 2, or 3.
B.2022.69 · sg (Art. 63 VRP)
Competition Commission v. Municipality on Contract Award Procedure Reviewability
Although cited in the reasoning regarding the principle of discretion (Dispositionsmaxime), this article was not explicitly mentioned in the dispositive orders (1, 2, or 3).
B.2022.63 · sg (Art. 63 VRP)
Insured Owner's Right to Demolition and Cleanup Costs Post-Sale Following Fire Damage
Cited to confirm that the court cannot rule beyond the applicant's requests regarding future invoices.
B.2022.63 · sg (Art. 63 VRP)
Insurance Reimbursement for Demolition Costs Post-Sale
Cited as the procedural basis limiting the court from awarding more than what was requested by the appellant.
B.2021.122 · sg (Art. 63 VRP)
Somali Applicant v. State Secretariat for Migration (Humanitarian Residence Permit)
Mentioned in the reasoning regarding the prohibition of reformatio in peius, but not explicitly cited in the final orders (Dispositive 1, 2, 3).
B.2020.187 · sg (Art. 63 VRP)
Social Assistance Retroactive Denial Appeal for Untimely Cost Guarantees
Applied because the court could not change the decision of the lower instance to the detriment of the appellant (Beschwerdeführerin).
B.2020.187 · sg (Art. 63 VRP)
Municipality Appeal Dismissed on Retroactive Welfare Cost Coverage Despite Late Submission and Imposition of Appeal Costs
Cited as the procedural basis preventing the court from changing the lower authority's decision to the appellant's detriment (prohibition of detrimental appeal review).
B.2019.74 · sg (Art. 63 VRP)
Building Permit Challenge Based on Void Development Plan Notification Upheld by Legal Certainty
Cited because the court could not go beyond the appellant's requests, which did not concern the conformity of the building project with the development plan.
B.2019.74 · sg (Art. 63 VRP)
Appeal Dismissed: Zoning Plan Validity Challenge in Building Permit Review
The court states it cannot go beyond the applicant's requests, which were based on arguments against the zoning plan, not the conformity of the building project itself.
B.2019.110 · sg (Art. 63 VRP)
Appellant v. Municipality regarding Demand for Immediate Planning Zone for Cellular Antenna Siting Exclusion
Mentioned in the reasoning regarding the court's inability to amend the decision to the detriment of the appellant, supporting the final outcome.
B.2018.245 · sg (Art. 63 VRP)
Recipient Refusal of Work Program Justifies Cessation of Social Assistance
Cited to explain why the court could not alter the decision to the detriment of the appellant when dismissing the appeal.
B.2018.173 · sg (Art. 63 VRP)
Administrative Court Upholds Denial of Justice Claim Over Five-Year Delay in School Transport Compensation Appeal
Cited in the reasoning as part of the procedural mechanism for remitting the case upon granting the appeal (though not explicitly in the final orders, it is implicitly covered by order 2).
B.2016.237 · sg (Art. 63 VRP)
Recognition of Serbian Marriage Between Deceased Swiss National and Serbian Citizen
Cited as the basis for the court's restriction not to rule beyond the appellants' requests, leading to the non-admission of the respondent's cross-appeal regarding costs.
B.2016.237 · sg (Art. 63 VRP)
Appeal Regarding Recognition of Foreign Marriage of Deceased Swiss Citizen
Cited to explain why the court cannot rule on the respondent's claims that go beyond the appellants' requests.
B.2017.73 · sg (Art. 63 VRP)
Conflict of Interest in Contract Award Nullifies Self-Review Prohibition Compliance
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the court's limitation on deciding beyond the appellant's requests, which implies a procedural aspect of the review framework.