Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
951.1 VRP CH-SG

Art. 61 Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRP) - Beschwerdegründe

Dritter Teil: Rechtsschutz in Verwaltungsstreitsachen - C. Beschwerde
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (138 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 61 VRP · Beschwerdegründe

1. Mit der Beschwerde an das Verwaltungsgericht können Rechtsverletzungen geltend gemacht werden.

2. Der Beschwerdeführer kann sich auch darauf berufen, die angefochtene Verfügung oder der angefochtene Entscheid beruhe auf einem unrichtig oder unvollständig festgestellten Sachverhalt.

3. Neue Begehren sind unzulässig.

← Art. 60bis VRP Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRP) - Geltungsbereich a) Grundsatz Art. 62 VRP →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (464)

B.2025.80 · sg (Art. 61 Abs. 1 VRP)
Child Placement Appeal: Support Class vs. Regular Classroom and Procedural Costs
Cited in the reasoning to define the scope of review by the court, though not directly in the final orders.
B.2025.75 · sg (Art. 61 Abs. 1 VRP)
Dual National's Appeal Against Revocation of Residence Permit Due to Deception Dismissed
Used to confirm that the court could only review whether the lower authority exercised its discretion without legal violation when rejecting the application under Art. 84 Abs. 5 AIG.
B.2023.167 · sg (Art. 61 VRP)
Professor's Non-Reappointment Quashed Due to Violation of Right to Be Heard
Cited in the reasoning explaining why the court could not cure the procedural violation (lack of discretionary review power, which is based on this article).
B.2024.215 · sg (Art. 61 Abs. 1 und 2 VRP)
Building Permit for Pizza Take-Away Upheld Despite Parking and Noise Objections
Cited implicitly by referring to the limited scope of review (legal control versus discretion review) applicable to the court.
B.2024.125 · sg (Art. 61 Abs. 1 VRP)
Denial of EU/EFTA Residence Permit Extension Upheld Due to Insufficient Cohabitation
Cited in the final order (Order 1) via the reasoning in E. 5, concerning the scope of judicial review (no exceeding of discretion).
B.2024.111 · sg (Art. 61 VRP)
Revocation of Residency Permit Following Divorce of EU Citizen Parent
Cited in the reasoning to affirm that the court can only review legality and factual errors when dismissing the appeal, implying this procedural standard governs the review of the discretionary decision.
B.2024.112 · sg (Art. 61 VRP)
Revocation of Derived Residence Permit Following Divorce Upheld
Cited as the standard for the court's review (discretionary control) in the context of dismissing the appeal.
B.2024.98 · sg (Art. 61 Abs. 1 und 2 VRP)
Property Owner Liability for Municipal Road Maintenance Upheld Based on Official Cost Allocation Scheme
This provision defines the scope of review (legal review limited to legal errors and incorrect/incomplete factual findings) applied by the Administrative Court in reviewing the decision of the lower court.
B.2024.194 · sg (Art. 61 Abs. 2 VRP)
Serbia Native Denied Swiss Residence After Prison Sentence
Cited in the reasoning to confirm the court's competence to review the discretionary decision of the lower authority.
B.2024.14 · sg (Art. 61 Abs. 1 und 2 VRP)
Administrative Court Review of Bachelor's Thesis Grading Deadline Calculation
Cited as the procedural basis confirming the court's jurisdiction to review the appeal based on the grounds raised by the appellant.
B.2024.83 · sg (Art. 61 Abs. 1 VRP)
Journalist Firearms Permit Renewal Appeal Successful Due to Insufficient Investigation
Cited in the reasoning regarding the grounds for appeal to the Administrative Court (legal violations).
B.2024.83 · sg (Art. 61 Abs. 2 VRP)
Journalist Firearms Permit Renewal Appeal Successful Due to Insufficient Investigation
Cited in the reasoning regarding the grounds for appeal to the Administrative Court (incorrectly or incompletely established facts).
B.2023.126 · sg (Art. 61 Abs. 2 VRP)
Fitness-to-Drive Examination Appeal Dismissed
The court cited this provision in the reasoning to assert its unrestricted factual jurisdiction.
B.2023.30 · sg (Art. 61 Abs. 1 VRP)
Appeal Dismissed: Public Path Classification Upheld Against Landowner Challenge
Cited to define the court's limited jurisdiction to correct legal errors, justifying non-interference with the respondent's discretion.
B.2023.30 · sg (Art. 61 Abs. 1 VRP)
Municipal Road Declassification Appeal Dismissed Due to Public Interest and Functional Necessity
Cited to confirm the court's limited cognisance (scope of review) in the context of upholding the classification decision.