Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
951.1 VRP CH-SG

Art. 53 Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRP) - Vernehmlassungen

Dritter Teil: Rechtsschutz in Verwaltungsstreitsachen - B. Rekurs
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (138 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 53 VRP · Vernehmlassungen

1. Die Vorinstanz und die Betroffenen erhalten Gelegenheit zur Stellungnahme, wenn der Rekurs nicht offensichtlich unzulässig oder unbegründet ist.

← Art. 52 VRP Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRP) - Geltungsbereich a) Grundsatz Art. 54 VRP →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (21)

B.2020.88 · sg (Art. 53 VRP)
Fire Levy Obligation Appeal: Gender, Nationality, and Physician Exemptions Rejected
Cited in the reasoning regarding the opportunity given to the respondent to provide comments (Vernehmlassung).
B.2016.42 · sg (Art. 64 in Verbindung mit Art. 53 VRP)
Municipality Refusal to Rezone Upheld Due to Unapproved Master Plan
Used to confirm the participation of the involved party (Beschwerdebeteiligte) in the appeal proceedings.
B.2016.42 · sg (Art. 64 in Verbindung mit Art. 53 VRP)
Property Owner v. Municipality: Zoning Reclassification Denial Upheld Due to Master Plan Conflict
Used to confirm that the involved party (Beschwerdebeteiligte) could be involved in the appeal procedure because it had participated in the previous instance procedure.
B.2015.294 · sg (Art. 53 Abs. 3 VRP)
Chinese National's Appeal for Self-Employment Residence Permit Denied
This article is not present. The cost imposition does not cite VRP articles, only Order 2 imposes costs.
B.2015.78 · sg (Art. 53 VRP)
Suspensive Effect Granted on Supply Contract Appeal Due to Lack of Express Opposition
Cited to draw an analogy regarding the consequence of missing a judicial deadline for submitting a statement of defense.
B.2015.78 · sg (Art. 53 VRP)
Suspensive Effect Granted on Supply Contract Award Appeal Despite Denied Extension Request
Cited in the reasoning regarding the rule applicable to judicial deadlines for submitting a statement of response.
B.2013.208 · sg (Art. 53 Abs. 1 VRP)
Appeal Dismissed for Out-of-District Schooling Due to Reasonable Alternative Route
Cited in relation to the invitation of affected parties to submit their statements (Vernehmlassung).
B.2012.242 · sg (Art. 64 Abs. 1 in Verbindung mit Art. 53 Abs. 1 VRP)
Residence Permit Revocation Upheld Over Drug Trafficking Conviction
Cited in the reasoning regarding the procedure for written submissions, although not explicitly in the final orders, it relates to procedural constraints discussed.
B.2012.242 · sg (Art. 64 Abs. 1 in Verbindung mit Art. 53 Abs. 1 VRP)
Revocation of Residency Permit Upheld Due to Drug Trafficking Conviction
Cited in the reasoning regarding the standard procedure of only one exchange of briefs in the appeal process.
B.2012.19 · sg (Art. 53 VRP)
Student Exclusion Upheld Despite Prior Procedural Flaw Due to Persistent Misconduct
Cited in the reasoning concerning the right to a statement regarding the appeal procedure (considered but not decisive in the final orders).
B.2011.130 · sg (Art. 64 Abs. 1 in Verbindung mit Art. 53 Abs. 1 VRP)
Property Dual Street Access and Road Maintenance Obligation
Cited to regulate the procedure regarding a second submission by the appellant during the appeal process.
B.2011.130 · sg (Art. 53 Abs. 1 VRP)
Commercial Property Maintenance Contribution Appeal
Cited to establish the rule that generally only one exchange of briefs takes place in the appeal procedure.
B.2011.9 · sg (Art. 64 Abs. 1 in Verbindung mit Art. 53 Abs. 1 VRP)
Road Classification Must Consider Future Construction
Cited in the reasoning section discussing procedural rules for the appeal, relevant for the admissibility/conduct of the written exchange, although the final orders only mention Art. 64 Abs. 1 in conjunction with Art. 56 Abs. 2 VRP for the remand.
B.2011.95.B.2011.96 · sg (Art. 53 VRP)
Procurement Contract Award Justification Adequacy and Curing of Procedural Defect
Used to confirm the general rule of a single set of written statements in appeal proceedings, where the appellant has the right to respond to the authority's statements.
B.2011.95.B.2011.96 · sg (Art. 53 VRP)
Contract Award Review: Insufficient Justification Overruled by Substantive Advantage
Cited in the reasoning regarding the basic procedure of a single exchange of briefs in the appeal proceedings.