Art. 52 Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRP) - Aktenüberweisung

B.2023.225 · sg (Art. 52 VRP)

Substitute Fee for Unfulfilled Medical On-Call Duties Unlawful Due to Defective Legal Basis

Cited in the context of the obligation for parties to submit complete documentation in future proceedings.

B.2023.23 · sg (Art. 64 in Verbindung mit Art. 52 VRP)

Building Permit Revocation Appeal Regarding Incomplete Structural Documentation

Cited in the reasoning regarding documentary evidence not being on file, but not explicitly used in the final orders.

B.2019.146 · sg (Art. 52 VRP)

Water Collection Facility Renewal and Forest Clearing Interpretation

Cited in the reasoning regarding the submission of files by the respondent in the recourse procedure.

B.2015.75 · sg (Art. 52 VRP)

Suspension of Procurement Award Due to Incomplete Documentation

Cited alongside Art. 64 VRP as part of the procedural rule obligating the lower court to submit the file.

B.2015.75 · sg (Art. 64 in Verbindung mit Art. 52 VRP)

Suspension of Procurement Award Due to Incomplete Documentation

Cited as the procedural basis requiring the lower court to submit the complete administrative file, which was missing.

B.2015.75 · sg (Art. 64 in Verbindung mit Art. 52 VRP)

Stay of Contract Award Granted Due to Incomplete Procurement File Submission

The court based its decision to grant the stay of execution on the failure of the lower instance to submit complete documents as required by these procedural rules.

B.2014.71 · sg (Art. 52 VRP)

Expropriation Compensation Appeal for Flood Protection Easement

Cited in E. 2 as the rule requiring the lower authority to submit all relevant files.

B.2014.71 · sg (Art. 52 VRP)

Property Owners v. Administrative Compensation Decision on Flood Dam Expropriation

Cited in the reasoning regarding the submission of files, but not cited in the final orders (1-3).

B.2012.19 · sg (Art. 52 VRP)

Student Exclusion Upheld Despite Prior Procedural Flaw Due to Persistent Misconduct

Cited in the reasoning concerning the requirement for the lower court to submit files (considered but not decisive in the final orders).

B.2004.171 · sg (Art. 52 VRP, sGS 951.1)

Appeal Against Salary Reduction Following Job Evaluation

This procedural rule concerning the duty to transmit files was mentioned in the background summary but not explicitly cited in the final dispositive orders (1, 2, or 3).

B.2004.171 · sg (Art. 52 VRP, sGS 951.1)

Salary Reduction Following Job Reclassification Deemed Arbitrary

The duty of the lower authority to transfer files to the appellate authority was mentioned in the introductory summary, but the final orders (1-3) do not explicitly cite it as a ground for the final ruling on the merits or costs.

B.2004.171 · sg (Art. 64 Abs. 1 in Verbindung mit Art. 52 VRP)

Salary Reduction Following Job Reclassification Deemed Arbitrary

Mentioned in the reasoning for the procedural history regarding the transfer of files, though the actual ruling on inadmissibility (Art. 64 VRP) was not the final ground for the decision.