951.1
VRP
CH-SG
CH-SG
Art. 42 Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRP) - c) Versicherungsgericht
Dritter Teil: Rechtsschutz in Verwaltungsstreitsachen - B. Rekurs
Art. 42 VRP · c) Versicherungsgericht
1. Beim Versicherungsgericht können mit Rekurs angefochten werden
a) Verfügungen und Einspracheentscheide, gegen die nach dem Bundesgesetz über den Allgemeinen Teil des Sozialversicherungsrechts Beschwerde erhoben werden kann;
abis) Einspracheentscheide der Sozialversicherungsanstalt über ausserordentliche Ergänzungsleistungen;
ater)* Verfügungen und Entscheide des Gemeinderates über Elternschaftsbeiträge und Bevorschussung von Unterhaltsbeiträgen;
b) ...
bbis) ...
bter) Einspracheentscheide der Sozialversicherungsanstalt des Kantons St.Gallen über Prämienverbilligungen für Versicherte in bescheidenen wirtschaftlichen Verhältnissen;
c)* ...
d) ...
e) Verfügungen und Entscheide, für welche die Regierung, wenn nicht besondere gesetzliche Vorschriften entgegenstehen, durch Verordnung die Möglichkeit des Weiterzugs an das Versicherungsgericht vorsieht.
2. Es ist oberes Gericht, wenn das Bundesrecht eine einzige kantonale Gerichtsinstanz vorschreibt.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (24)
EL.2021.17 · sg (Art. 42 VRP)
Appeal Regarding Retroactive Revocation of Supplementary Benefits and Repayment Order
Cited in the reasoning (Section 7.1) regarding the classification of the appeal concerning the cantonal part of the dispute as a recourse (Rekurs).
EL.2021.17 · sg (Art. 42 VRP)
Claimant Ordered to Repay Supplementary Benefits Due to Reduced Loan Interest Deduction
Cited in the dispositive reasoning (point 7.1) to justify why the appeal regarding cantonal benefits must be treated as a recourse (Rekurs) and subsequently dismissed.
IV.2020.127 · sg (Art. 42 Abs. 1 lit. a VRP)
Appeal Dismissed Due to Prior Final Decision on Disability Benefits
Cited in the introductory text alongside the article leading to the court's action of not entering upon the appeal.
IV.2020.127 · sg (Art. 42 Abs. 1 lit. a VRP)
Disability Benefits Appeal Voided by Procedural Error Following Unproven Initial Notice
Cited in the initial summary alongside Art. 56 ATSG, which addresses the appealability of the decision to the administrative court.
EL.2019.14 · sg (Art. 42 VRP/SG)
Repayment Obligation for Overpaid Benefits Despite Lack of Explicit Cohabitation Reporting Duty
This procedural rule governs the type of recourse filed against the cantonal part of the decision concerning the waiver of repayment of extraordinary supplementary benefits.
MV.2018.1 · sg (Art. 42 VRP)
Claimant Denied Tinnitus Treatment Reimbursement Due to Lack of Objective Proof of Causation
This article was cited in the reasoning when qualifying the appellant's submission as a local appeal (Rekurs).
EL.2016.46 · sg (Art. 42 VRP)
Finality of Judgment Bars Administrative Correction of Prior Benefit Calculation Error
Cited in reasoning to classify the prior court judgment (EL 2014/45) as a cantonal appeal decision (Rekursentscheid).
EL.2016.44 · sg (Art. 42 VRP)
Suspension of Supplementary Benefit Proceedings Pending Occupational Pension Determination
Cited during the reasoning concerning the status of the appeal process under cantonal law, but not in the dispositive.
KV.SG.2015.12 · sg (Art. 42 Abs. 1 lit. bter VRP)
Forfeiture of Premium Reduction Application Deadline Due to Missed Statutory Period
This provision was cited in the introductory part of the decision to establish the correct legal remedy (Rekurs) for appealing premium reduction decisions, although the court ultimately rejected the appeal on substantive grounds.
KV.SG.2015.12 · sg (Art. 42 Abs. 1 lit. bter VRP)
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Premium Reduction Application
This provision defines the correct appeal (Rekurs) against the decision regarding premium reduction, which the court addressed procedurally.
EL.2013.29.EL.2013 · sg (Art. 42 Abs. 1 lit. abis VRP)
Retroactive Benefits Calculation and Fluctuating Spousal Income
Cited in connection with the dismissal of the appeal regarding extraordinary supplementary benefits, suggesting it might govern the procedural classification of that part of the appeal (as a rekurs/appeal).
EL.2013.29.EL.2013.49 · sg (Art. 42 Abs. 1 lit. abis VRP)
Recalculation of Supplementary Benefits and Repayment Limitations
Cited in the reasoning section (Erwägung 6.2) regarding the nature of the appeal concerning extraordinary supplementary benefits (although the core decision is about returning the case).
B.2015.75 · sg (Art. 42 VRP)
Stay of Contract Award Granted Due to Incomplete Procurement File Submission
This article concerns the President's competence to decide on the request for a stay of execution within ten days.
B.2014.248 · sg (Art. 42 VRP)
Public Procurement Award Decision Suspended Due to Flawed Price Evaluation and Unjustified Scoring
This procedural rule was cited to establish that the President of the Administrative Court rules on the request for suspensive effect.
KV.2013.15 · sg (Art. 42 Abs. 1 lit. e VRP)
Hospital Cost Coverage for Out-of-Canton Inpatient Diagnostic Referral Complicated by Emergency Event
Cited in the reasoning to establish the jurisdiction of the Insurance Court.