951.1
VRP
CH-SG
Art. 4 Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRP) - b) zwischen Verwaltung und Justiz
Erster Teil: Allgemeine Bestimmungen
Art. 4 VRP · b) zwischen Verwaltung und Justiz
1. Können sich Verwaltungsbehörden und Gerichte über ihre Zuständigkeit nicht einigen, entscheiden darüber Regierung und Kantonsgericht in gegenseitigem Einvernehmen.
2. Ist die Verwaltungsrekurskommission, das Versicherungsgericht oder das Verwaltungsgericht beteiligt, entscheiden Regierung und Verwaltungsgericht in gegenseitigem Einvernehmen.
3. Können sich Regierung und Kantonsgericht oder Regierung und Verwaltungsgericht nicht einigen, entscheidet der Kantonsrat.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (14)
B.2021.226 · sg (Art. 4 Abs. 1 lit. c VRP)
Appeal Regarding Conversion of Non-Conforming Holiday Home to Primary Residence and Nuisance Objection
Cited in the context of the right to a reasoned decision, which was found to be violated but cured.
B.2018.124 · sg (Art. 4 Abs. 1 des Reglements über die Organisation und den Geschäftsgang des Verwaltungsgerichts, sGS 941.22, in Verbindung mit Art. 33 Abs. 2 des Gesetzes über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege, sGS 951.1, VRP)
Suspension of Public Procurement Award Pending Review of Qualification Criteria Compliance
These procedural rules establish the President's authority to issue the provisional order.
B.2018.39 · sg (Art. 4 Abs. 1 Reglement Organisation VRP)
Procurement Challenge Based on Invalid Award Notification
Although cited in the reasoning section regarding the President's competence, this procedural rule justifying the non-entry into the merits is implicitly covered by the general decision in order 2 (non-entry) which rests on the lack of a challengeable object, a core issue explicitly mentioned in order 1.
B.2017.251.und.B.201 · sg (Art. 4 Abs. 1 des Reglements über die Organisation und den Geschäftsgang des Verwaltungsgerichts, sGS 941.22, in Verbindung mit Art. 33 Abs. 2 des Gesetzes über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege, sGS 951.1, VRP)
Applicants v. Awarding Authority Regarding Post-Prequalification Tender Modification and Suspensive Effect
Cited to establish the President of the Administrative Court's authority to decide on the request for suspensive effect.
B.2014.86.B.2014.87 · sg (Art. 4 des Gesetzes über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege, sGS 951.1, VRP)
Taxpayer Timeliness of Appeal Upheld Despite Postal Delay Dispute
Only the substantive rules regarding the objection deadline (Art. 180 StG, Art. 132 DBG) and the cost rule (Art. 66 LTF) are explicitly cited in the dispositive.
B.2014.86.B.2014.87 · sg (Art. 4 des Gesetzes über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege, sGS 951.1, VRP)
Taxpayer Timeliness of Appeal Upheld Despite Postal Delay Dispute
The appeals concerning the substantive tax law are dismissed in orders 2 and 3, upholding the VRK's decision on the timeliness issue, which heavily relied on Art. 180 StG and Art. 132 DBG as the governing provisions for objection deadlines.
B.2014.86.B.2014.87 · sg (Art. 4 des Gesetzes über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege, sGS 951.1, VRP)
Taxpayer Timeliness of Appeal Upheld Despite Postal Delay Dispute
The court did not cite any additional procedural rule or ground for the dismissal in orders 2 and 3, only the substantive rules defining the objection deadline (Art. 180 StG, Art. 132 DBG).
B.2014.86.B.2014.87 · sg (Art. 4 des Gesetzes über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege, sGS 951.1, VRP)
Taxpayer Timeliness of Appeal Upheld Despite Postal Delay Dispute
The court did not explicitly cite any provision in the dispositive (orders 1-4) regarding the merits or procedural grounds for dismissal beyond confirming admissibility (E. 2) and finally dismissing the appeals (E. 2, 3). However, the substantive dismissal relies on the finding related to Art. 180 StG and Art. 132 DBG.
B.2014.86.B.2014.87 · sg (Art. 4 des Gesetzes über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege, sGS 951.1, VRP)
Taxpayer Timeliness of Appeal Upheld Despite Postal Delay Dispute
The court implicitly based the dismissal of the appeal on the finding that the objection was timely (upholding the VRK decision), referencing the substantive law (Art. 180 StG/Art. 132 DBG). The only cost provision cited in the dispositive is for Order 4.
B.2014.86.B.2014.87 · sg (Art. 4 des Gesetzes über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege, sGS 951.1, VRP)
Taxpayer Timeliness of Appeal Upheld Despite Postal Delay Dispute
The court orders the dismissal of the appeals (Orders 2 and 3) based on the reasoning concerning the timeliness of the objection, which relied on Art. 180 StG and Art. 132 DBG. The procedural articles cited in E. 2 (Art. 229 StG, Art. 194 StG, Art. 64 VRP, Art. 48 VRP, Art. 145 DBG, Art. 140 DBG) confirmed admissibility but are not the basis for the final orders 2 and 3.
B.2014.86.B.2014.87 · sg (Art. 4 des Gesetzes über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege, sGS 951.1, VRP)
Taxpayer Timeliness of Appeal Upheld Despite Postal Delay Dispute
The only procedural provision explicitly cited in the dispositive is in order 1 (implicitly procedural) and order 2 (admissibility checks). Since the core decision is in orders 2 and 3 (dismissal), the primary relevant provisions are those governing the objection deadline (Art. 180 StG and Art. 132 DBG).
B.2014.86.B.2014.87 · sg (Art. 4 des Gesetzes über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege, sGS 951.1, VRP)
Taxpayer Timeliness of Appeal Upheld Despite Postal Delay Dispute
The procedural articles cited in E. 2 confirmed that the appeal was admissible, which precedes the substance of the decision (E. 3) that led to the dismissal in Orders 2 and 3.
B.2014.86.B.2014.87 · sg (Art. 4 des Gesetzes über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege, sGS 951.1, VRP)
Taxpayer Timeliness of Appeal Upheld Despite Postal Delay Dispute
The reasoning cites provisions leading to the dismissal of the appeals (Art. 2 and 3), but Article 4 VRP itself is not explicitly mentioned in the operative part (dispositive) related to the final orders (2 and 3).
B.2014.86.B.2014.87 · sg (Art. 4 Nr. 4 VRP)
Tax Objection Timeliness Upheld Despite Late Filing Claim
This article appears in the reasoning but is not explicitly cited in the final dispositive orders (1 to 4).