941.1
GERG
CH-SG
CH-SG
Art. 17 Gerichtsgesetz (GerG) - Versicherungsgericht
B. Organisation - I. Gerichte - 3. Kanton - b) Verwaltungsrechtspflege
Art. 17 GerG · Versicherungsgericht
1. Dem Versicherungsgericht gehören als Mitglieder hauptamtliche, teilamtliche und nebenamtliche Richterinnen oder Richter in der erforderlichen Zahl an. Für die Tätigkeit als gesetzliches Schiedsgericht werden ihm Fachrichterinnen oder Fachrichter beigegeben.
2. Das Versicherungsgericht ist in Abteilungen und Kammern gegliedert. Es spricht Recht in Dreierbesetzung. Als Schiedsgericht entscheidet es in Fünferbesetzung. Für einfache Fälle können Einzelrichterentscheide vorgesehen werden.
3. Die Mitglieder der Verwaltungsrekurskommission sind Ersatzrichterinnen oder Ersatzrichter.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (25)
IV.2021.98 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 GerG)
Child Pension Overpayment Recovery Remission Appeal Moot Due to Superseding Administrative Revision
This article is mentioned to justify the use of a single judge based on the case being simple (einfache Fälle), which aligns with the basis for the final order.
IV.2021.98 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 GerG)
Appeal Regarding Waiver of Repayment of Child's Pension Benefits Following Superseded Administrative Decision
Cited as the legal basis allowing the Insurance Court to issue a decision by a single judge in this simple case.
EL.2022.15 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 GerG)
Welfare Benefits Calculation and Duty to Mitigate Loss in Context of Care Home Admission
Cited in the reasoning (section 3) to justify the decision being made by a single judge.
EL.2022.15 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 GerG)
Supplementary Benefits Recipient's Duty to Mitigate Loss Regarding Unterminated Lease and Disability Allowance Recalculation
This provision justifies the court's decision to issue a ruling by a single judge.
IV.2021.151 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 GerG)
Legality of Retroactive Cancellation of Extended Rehabilitation Training Program Based on Changed Factual Circumstances
Cited as the basis for the court's decision to proceed with a single judge ruling due to the simplicity of the case.
IV.2021.151 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 GerG)
Retroactive Cancellation of Extended Rehabilitation Training Due to Changed Health Circumstances
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for allowing a single-judge decision for simple cases, which is confirmed by the reference to Art. 18 OrgR in the dispositive.
KV.SG.2017.1 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 GerG)
Appeal Regarding Recalculation of Premium Subsidies Based on Estimated Tax Assessment
Cited in reasoning 5.1 to justify the decision to dismiss the appeal by a single judge.
KV.SG.2017.1 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 Gerichtsgesetz [GerG, sGS 941.1])
Appeal Dismissed: Premium Subsidy Reduction Based on Estimated Final Tax Assessment
Used to justify that the appeal (Rekurs) must be dismissed by a single judge.
IV.2015.392 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 GerG)
Appeal Against Rejection of Increased Disability Allowance Following Procedural Violation Waiver
Cited as the basis for the single-judge decision.
IV.2015.392 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 GerG)
Disability Benefit Increase Refusal Upheld Despite Procedural Error
Cited as the basis allowing the single judge to rule on the matter, given the clear factual situation and legal outcome.
KV.SG.2015.10 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 GerG [sGS 941.1])
Appeal Dismissed: Premium Subsidy Calculation Based on Post-Graduation Income Under New Regulation
Cited as the procedural basis allowing the single judge to dismiss the appeal as obviously unfounded.
KV.SG.2015.10 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 GerG)
Appeal Dismissed: Application of New Premium Subsidy Income Assessment Rule
Cited as the procedural basis for deciding the appeal by a single judge.
KV.Z.2014.8 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 GerG)
Insured Prevails in Coverage Dispute Over Undisclosed Medical History
Cited in conjunction with OrgV for the decision to grant the claim by a single judge.
IV.2014.391 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 GerG)
Disability Benefits Recovery After Premature Education Cessation
Cited as the procedural basis for handling the case as a single-judge decision due to its simplicity.
IV.2014.485 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 GerG)
Invalidity Pension Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing Due to Saturday Service Rule
This provision was used to classify the case as simple, justifying the fixing of the court fee at CHF 400.