851.1
CH-SG
Art. 4 Gesetz über das Salzregal - b) Ersatz von Gebühren
Art. 4 Gesetz über das Salzregal · b) Ersatz von Gebühren
1. Wer dem Staat Regalgebühren vorenthält, hat ihm den Ausfall zu ersetzen, auch wenn kein Strafverfahren durchgeführt wird.
2. Das zuständige Departement setzt den Ersatzbetrag fest.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (10)
B.2024.36 · sg (Art. 4 Abs. 1 ZUG)
Intercantonal Social Assistance Responsibility and Supported Living Arrangements
Used in conjunction with Art. 5 ZUG to determine that the intention for permanent stay was not present in W.___ (BE) for domicile establishment.
DIGS411.483 · sg (Art. 4 Abs. 2 ZUG)
Municipality Responsibility for Social Welfare Support Residence Dispute
Cited as the legal presumption regarding the establishment of the place of permanent stay upon police registration.
DIGS411.483 · sg (Art. 4 Abs.1 ZUG)
Municipality Responsibility for Social Welfare Support Residence Dispute
Cited in defining the competent municipality based on the place of permanent stay (Unterstützungswohnsitz).
B.2020.232 · sg (Art. 4 Abs. 1 ZUG)
Social Assistance Recipient's Claim for Rent Coverage Based on Intent to Relocate Denied
This provision defines where a needy person has their administrative residence for support purposes, which was the core issue regarding local jurisdiction.
B.2020.232 · sg (Art. 4 Abs. 1 ZUG)
Social Assistance Recipient's Insufficient Establishment of Support Residence
This provision establishes the rule for determining the supportive residence, which is the central issue for the court's decision to dismiss the appeal regarding competence.
B.2019.82 · sg (Art. 4 Abs. 1 ZUG)
Social Assistance Jurisdiction and Support Residence Establishment
This provision defines the location of the support residence (Unterstützungswohnsitz) and is the core legal basis for determining jurisdiction, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
B.2019.82 · sg (Art. 4 Abs. 1 ZUG)
Social Assistance Jurisdiction: Objective vs. Subjective Residence
This provision defines where a person in need has their support residence (the canton where they reside with the intention of permanent stay), which is the core issue leading to the dismissal of the appeal based on lack of territorial jurisdiction.
B.2012.12 · sg (Art. 4 Abs. 2 ZUG)
Support Obligation for Destitute Person Remains with Initial Transferring Municipality
Cited in reasoning regarding the presumption of establishing a municipality of support through police registration, which was rebutted in this case.
B.2012.12 · sg (Art. 4 Abs. 2 ZUG)
Municipality's Continued Support Obligation Following Shelter Transfers
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the presumption of residence based on police registration, although the court ultimately applied Art. 5 and Art. 11 Abs. 2 ZUG instead.
KV.2007.15 · sg (Art. 4 ZUG)
Canton v. Individual: Health Insurance Domicile and Intent to Reside
This provision is cited in the reasoning regarding the canton responsible for supporting a person in need based on their intent to remain, which is relevant context but not used in the final orders.