Art. 17 Interkantonale Vereinbarung über das öffentliche Beschaffungswesen (IVöB) - Verfahrensarten

B.2022.59 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 IVöB)

Appeal Dismissed in Public Procurement Award Suspension Request

This provision governs the conditions for granting suspensive effect to an appeal, which was the primary subject of the order to dismiss the request.

B.2022.59 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 IVöB)

Procurement Appeal on Lighting Fixture Award Denied on Merits

This provision governed the standard for granting suspensive effect, which was assessed when rejecting the request.

B.2021.236 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 IVöB)

Contract Award Challenge Dismissed Due to Untimely Objection to Agreed Dialog Procedure

The court referenced this provision in its introductory statement to explain the legal basis for granting suspensive effect in public procurement matters, though the main decision to reject the request was based on the finding that the appeal was not sufficiently well-founded (Erwägung 3).

B.2021.236 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 IVöB)

Public Procurement Appeal Dismissed Due to Untimely Objection to Dialogue Phase

Cited in the reasoning (Erwägung 2) as part of the legal basis determining whether to grant suspensive effect.

B.2021.154 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 IVöB)

Procurement Challenge Dismissed Due to Lack of Realistic Chance of Success

The rejection of the request for suspension of effect is based on the finding that the appeal is obviously unfounded, which is the condition for denial under this provision.

B.2021.154 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 IVöB)

Contract Award Appeal Suspension Denial for Lack of Merit

This provision governs the granting of suspensive effect, which was denied in order 1 because the appeal appeared obviously unfounded.

B.2021.140 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 IVöB)

Appeal Dismissed Regarding Suspension of Framework Contract Award for Diagnostic Ultrasound Equipment

Cited as the legal basis for granting suspensive effect, which was ultimately denied because the appeal was not deemed sufficiently founded.

B.2021.140 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 IVöB)

Public Procurement Appeal Dismissal Regarding Ultrasound Devices

Cited as the legal basis for granting a suspensive effect if the appeal appears sufficiently substantiated and no overriding public or private interests oppose it, which ultimately led to the dismissal of the request.

B.2021.99 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 IVöB)

Contract Award Appeal Dismissed Due to Lack of Merit

This provision, relating to the granting of suspensive effect in procurement law, is implicitly central to the reasoning for dismissing the request, as the court assesses whether the appeal appears sufficiently founded under this standard (Art. 5 EGöB in conjunction with Art. 17 Abs. 2 IVöB).

B.2021.99 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 IVöB)

Appeal of Contract Award Following Tender Cancellation Upheld

The decision to reject the request for suspensive effect is based on the analysis performed under the standard set by this provision for granting such effect.

B.2021.99 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 IVöB)

Appeal of Contract Award Suspended Pending Clarification of Dual Procurement Procedures

This provision concerning the requirements for granting suspensive effect (sufficiently reasoned appeal) is the main legal basis discussed for assessing the preliminary injunction request, even though the final order does not explicitly cite it for denying the injunction itself.

B.2021.78 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 IVöB)

Rejection of Suspension on Appeal of Hydraulic Engineering Tender Exclusion Due to Substantial Bid Incompleteness

This provision was cited as the basis for determining whether to grant the request for suspensive effect, which the court ultimately denied.

B.2021.78 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 IVöB)

Bidder Exclusion Upheld in Public Procurement for Cost Omission

This provision was cited in the reasoning (point 2) as the legal basis for granting suspensive effect, which the court ultimately denied in order 1, indicating its relevance to the substantive outcome regarding the request.

B.2021.41 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 IVöB)

Endoscopic System Exclusion Upheld in Procurement Appeal

Cited as part of the legal basis for deciding whether to grant suspensive effect, specifically regarding sufficient justification of the appeal.

B.2021.41 · sg (Art. 17 Abs. 2 IVöB)

Bidder Exclusion Upheld in Public Procurement Due to Image Interference with Existing Laser Technology

This provision was cited in the reasoning as the legal basis for granting the suspensive effect if the appeal appears sufficiently founded.