841.51
IVÖBAIMP
CH-SG
CH-SG
Art. 11 Interkantonale Vereinbarung über das öffentliche Beschaffungswesen (IVöB) - Verfahrensgrundsätze
3. Kapitel: Allgemeine Grundsätze
Art. 11 IVöB · Verfahrensgrundsätze
1. Bei der Vergabe öffentlicher Aufträge beachtet der Auftraggeber folgende Verfahrensgrundsätze
a) Er führt Vergabeverfahren transparent, objektiv und unparteiisch durch;
b) er trifft Massnahmen gegen Interessenkonflikte, unzulässige Wettbewerbsabreden und Korruption;
c) er achtet in allen Phasen des Verfahrens auf die Gleichbehandlung der Anbieter;
d) er verzichtet auf Abgebotsrunden;
e) er wahrt den vertraulichen Charakter der Angaben der Anbieter.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (33)
B.2019.121 · sg (Art. 11 Ingress und lit. a IVöB)
Sewage Association Contract Award Challenge Dismissed on Bidder Qualification and Evaluation Discretion
The Court found that the lower authority did not violate the principle of equal treatment of bidders, which is anchored in this provision, during the assessment of the offers.
B.2019.121 · sg (Art. 11 lit. a IVöB)
Wastewater Association Contract Award Challenge Dismissed on Discretion in Experience Assessment
Cited in the conclusion (order 4.5) as the basis for upholding the original decision regarding the principle of equal treatment of bidders.
B.2018.187 · sg (Art. 11 lit. a IVöB)
Suspension of Architectural Award Due to Unequal Bid Evaluation
Cited in the reasoning to establish a potential violation of the principle of equal treatment, which supported the granting of the suspension.
B.2018.187 · sg (Art. 11 lit. a IVöB)
Suspensive Effect Granted in Architectural Services Award Due to Unequal Cost Evaluation
Cited in the reasoning section (2.2) as the principle potentially violated concerning equal treatment of bidders, which supports the decision to grant the suspension.
B.2018.31 · sg (Art. 11 lit. a IVöB)
Procurement Challenge Regarding Vehicle Specification Scoring Upheld
The reasoning discusses the application of this provision regarding non-discrimination in the context of product specifications, which formed the basis for evaluating the alleged errors in points deduction (Erwägung 2.2).
B.2018.31 · sg (Art. 11 lit. a IVöB)
Contract Award Upheld Despite Technical Specification Dispute
This provision regarding non-discrimination was discussed in the reasoning for upholding the evaluation criteria, although the main basis for dismissing the appeal was that the evaluation itself was not flawed.
B.2018.74 · sg (Art. 11 lit. a IVöB)
Appeal Against Engineering Services Award Dismissed Over Pricing and Scheduling Evaluation
Cited in the reasoning to justify the assessment criteria being in line with the principle of equal treatment of applicants, although the main ground for dismissal is procedural.
B.2018.74 · sg (Art. 11 lit. a IVöB)
Appeal Dismissed Regarding Engineering Services Contract Award for Debris Retention Basin
The court analyzed whether the evaluation complied with the public procurement principle of equal treatment among applicants, which is explicitly cited in the dispositive through the implicit dismissal of the appeal contesting the evaluation methodology.
B.2017.233 · sg (Art. 11 lit. a IVöB)
Bidder Exclusion Overturned Due to Unequal Treatment in Public Procurement Review
The court found the exclusion of the appellant to be incompatible with the public procurement rule requiring equal treatment of bidders, which is grounded in this article.
B.2017.233 · sg (Art. 11 lit. a IVöB)
Bidder Exclusion in Public Procurement Over Equal Treatment Violation
The exclusion of the appellant was found to be incompatible with the procurement law requirement of equal treatment of bidders, which is anchored in this provision.
B.2017.23 · sg (Art. 11 lit. a IVöB)
Supplier Appeal Dismissed in Public Procurement Lighting Fixture Award
Cited in the reasoning to support the finding that assigning an average grade of 1 for the third reference object due to lack of obtainable information was not objectionable in terms of equal treatment among bidders.
B.2017.23 · sg (Art. 11 lit. a IVöB)
Procurement Challenge Dismissed Over Fair Scoring of Lighting Fixtures
Cited as the standard for equal treatment of bidders, concerning the assignment of a low average score for an unassessable reference object.
B.2017.251.und.B.2017.253 · sg (Art. 11 lit. a IVöB)
Appeal Against Modification of Tender Documents After Prequalification
Cited as a general principle relevant to the merits analysis leading to the granting of suspensive effect.
B.2017.251.und.B.201 · sg (Art. 1 Abs. 3 Ingress und lit. b sowie Art. 11 Ingress und lit. a IVöB)
Applicants v. Awarding Authority Regarding Post-Prequalification Tender Modification and Suspensive Effect
Cited in the reasoning to establish the procurement law principle of equal treatment of bidders.
B.2017.233 · sg (Art. 11 Ingress lit. a IVöB)
Administrative Court Grants Suspensive Effect Against Exclusion Following Nullified Award Decision
Cited in the reasoning as an obligation for the lower authority concerning the principle of equal treatment, which supports the grounds for granting the suspensive effect.