841.11
VÖB
CH-SG
CH-SG
Art. 5 Verordnung über das öffentliche Beschaffungswesen (VöB) - Lohngleichheit von Frau und Mann ([Art. 12](https://www.gesetzessammlung.sg.ch/data/841.51/de/art12) Abs. 1 IVöB)
I. Allgemeine Grundsätze
Art. 5 VöB · Lohngleichheit von Frau und Mann ([Art. 12](https://www.gesetzessammlung.sg.ch/data/841.51/de/art12) Abs. 1 IVöB)
1. Anbieterinnen und Anbieter, die nach dem Bundesgesetz über die Gleichstellung von Frau und Mann vom 24. März 1995 zur Durchführung einer Lohngleichheitsanalyse verpflichtet sind, reichen mit dem Angebot ein
a) das Ergebnis der Lohngleichheitsanalyse nach Art. 13a GlG und, soweit Art. 13d GlG Anwendung findet, den Bericht der unabhängigen Stelle;
b) die Kontrollbestätigung einer staatlichen Stelle, wenn eine Ausnahme nach Art. 13b GlG vorliegt.
2. Alle übrigen Anbieterinnen und Anbieter bestätigen die Einhaltung der Lohngleichheit von Frau und Mann mittels Selbstdeklaration.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (15)
B.2017.233 · sg (Art. 5 Abs. 1 VöB)
Administrative Court Grants Suspensive Effect Against Exclusion Following Nullified Award Decision
Cited in the reasoning as an obligation for the lower authority concerning the principle of equal treatment, which supports the grounds for granting the suspensive effect.
B.2017.233 · sg (Art. 5 Abs. 1 VöB)
Bidder Exclusion Suspension in Procurement Dispute Over Suitability Assessment
Cited in the reasoning to support the requirement for equal treatment of bidders, a factor considered in the decision to grant suspensive effect.
B.2014.139.B.2014.142 · sg (Art. 5 VöB)
Consolidated Appeals Against Public Service Contract Award Dismissed Due to Insufficient Substantiation
Cited as the basis for the criteria used by the lower court to make the award decision comparable, which was not found to violate principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination.
B.2014.140.B.2014.141 · sg (Art. 5 VöB)
Public Service Contract Award Appeal Dismissed Due to Insufficient Substantiation
Cited in the reasoning (E. 5.2.5) concerning the principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination, which supports the underlying finding that the appeal was not sufficiently substantiated (leading to dismissal in Order 2).
B.2014.140.B.2014.1 · sg (Art. 5 VöB)
Procurement Challenge: Stay of Execution Denied in Coaching Services Award
Cited in the reasoning to support the decision that the evaluation respected equality and non-discrimination principles, though the main ground for dismissing the request for suspensive effect is based on the lack of sufficient grounding of the appeal itself.
B.2010.156 · sg (Art. 5 VöB)
Annulment of Award Decision Due to Violation of Equal Treatment in Public Procurement
The appeal was upheld because the awarding of the contract violated the principle of equal treatment enshrined in this provision.
B.2010.156 · sg (Art. 5 VöB)
Architectural Competition Award Annulled Due to Unequal Treatment on Boundary Condition Violation
Cited in the final order (No. 1) as the legal basis for overturning the award decision due to a violation of equal treatment principles.
B.2006.139 · sg (Art. 5 Abs. 1 VöB)
Procurement Award Annulled for Unequal Treatment and Insufficient Reasoning
The court ordered the annulment of the exclusion of the appellant because it violated the principle of equal treatment enshrined in this article.
B.2006.139 · sg (Art. 5 Abs. 1 VöB)
Procurement Award Annulled Due to Unequal Treatment and Insufficient Justification
The decision to exclude the appellant was overturned because it violated the principle of equal treatment required by this article.
B.2006.73 · sg (Art. 5 VöB)
Public Procurement Appeal Dismissed Over Tender Specification Objections
The court implicitly relied on this provision in deciding that objections regarding the nature of the service must be raised against the tender, not the award decision.
B.2006.73 · sg (Art. 5 VöB)
Appeal Against Contract Award Dismissed Due to Untimely Specification Challenges
Cited as part of the legal basis for the equality principle which was deemed not violated by the marginal modification of the performance.
B.2005.224 · sg (Art. 5 Abs. 1 VöB)
Public Procurement Appeal: Improper Environmental Criterion in Lighting Fixture Award
Cited as the violated rule due to discriminatory evaluation of environmental compatibility.
B.2005.224 · sg (Art. 5 Abs. 1 VöB)
Environmental Compatibility in Procurement: Distance vs. Actual Factors
The award decision was annulled because the evaluation of environmental compatibility constituted discrimination against external bidders, violating the principle of equal treatment.
B.2005.134 · sg (Art. 5 VöB)
Bid Immutability in Public Procurement
The appeal was granted and the government's decision was revoked because granting the contract subject to post-award improvement violated the principle of equal treatment.
B.2005.134 · sg (Art. 5 VöB)
Immutability of Bids in Public Procurement Following Post-Submission Correction
The appeal was upheld because the conditional award violated the principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination.