841.11
VÖB
CH-SG
CH-SG
Art. 12 Verordnung über das öffentliche Beschaffungswesen (VöB) - Dokumentationspflichten ([Art. 38](https://www.gesetzessammlung.sg.ch/data/841.51/de/art38) bis 40 IVöB)
II. Vergabeverfahren
Art. 12 VöB · Dokumentationspflichten ([Art. 38](https://www.gesetzessammlung.sg.ch/data/841.51/de/art38) bis 40 IVöB)
1. Die Auftraggeberin oder der Auftraggeber dokumentiert die Prüfung, die Bereinigung und die Bewertung der Angebote in einem Evaluationsbericht so, dass diese nachvollziehbar sind.
2. Das Protokoll der Angebotsbereinigung enthält wenigstens folgende Angaben
a) Ort;
b) Datum;
c) Namen der Teilnehmenden;
d) bereinigte Angebotsbestandteile;
e) Resultate der Bereinigung.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (47)
B.2022.43 · sg (Art. 12 Abs. 1 VöB)
Challenge Against Public Procurement Award Dismissed
Cited in the reasoning section concerning the justification for excluding a bidder from the procurement process.
B.2022.43 · sg (Art. 12 Abs. 1 VöB)
Procurement Challenge Dismissed for Untimely Objections and Valid Award Justification
Cited in paragraph 4.2 to discuss the grounds for exclusion from the procurement procedure.
B.2019.238 · sg (Art. 12 Abs. 1 VöB)
Contract Award Suspension Dismissed Despite Significant Price Discrepancy
This provision detailing grounds for exclusion was cited in the context of assessing whether the low offer indicated a failure to meet suitability criteria.
B.2019.238 · sg (Art. 12 Abs. 1 lit. a VöB)
Public Contract Award Suspensive Effect Denial Due to Project Urgency
Cited in the reasoning concerning the exclusion of a bidder for non-compliance with qualification criteria, linked to unusually low bids.
B.2019.26 · sg (Art. 12 Abs. 1 VöB)
Claimant's Appeal for Revocation of Court-Mandated Contract Award Dismissed
This article, regarding the conditions under which a contract award can be revoked, was explicitly discussed in the reasoning leading to the final decision to dismiss the appeal.
B.2019.26 · sg (Art. 12 VöB)
Denial of Justice Claim Against Refusal to Revoke Contract Award Following Judicial Confirmation
Cited in the reasoning as a relevant legal basis concerning the withdrawal of an award, which was considered in determining whether the claimant had a right to withdrawal.
B.2019.45 · sg (Art. 12 Abs. 1 lit. a VöB)
Challenger's Bid Suitability Review Upheld
Cited as the provision allowing the contracting authority to exclude a supplier who does not meet the qualification criteria, relevant to the substance of the appeal.
B.2019.45 · sg (Art. 12 Abs. 1 lit. a VöB)
Public Contract Award Upheld Despite Personnel Capacity Challenge
Cited in the context of the power of the contracting authority to exclude a provider who does not meet the capacity criteria.
B.2018.124 · sg (Art. 12 Abs. 1 lit. a VöB)
Contract Award Annulled Due to Unrealistic General Contractor Requirement in Reference Projects
Although cited earlier in the reasoning (section 3.2) regarding discretionary exclusion, the core issue leading to the partial granting of the appeal relates to fulfilling this public procurement regulation regarding qualification criteria.
B.2018.124 · sg (Art. 12 Abs. 1 lit. a VöB)
Contract Award Annulled Due to Infeasible Qualification Criterion
Mentioned in the reasoning (Erw. 3.2) as the source of discretion regarding exclusion, though the actual reason for the verdict in the dispositive is procedural/cost-related.
B.2017.264 · sg (Art. 12 VöB)
Bid Exclusion Upheld for Dissolved Entity Submission
Cited in the reasoning regarding grounds for exclusion, which forms the basis for dismissing the appeal.
B.2017.264 · sg (Art. 12 VöB)
Bidder Exclusion Upheld Due to Ambiguous Identification in Procurement Process
The decision's reasoning implicitly addresses the grounds for exclusion, although the final order dismisses the appeal because the ground for challenge (the exclusion order) was no longer relevant to the appellant.
B.2018.124 · sg (Art. 12 Abs. 1 lit. a VöB)
Suspension of Hydropower Equipment Contract Award Due to Insufficient General Contractor Reference
Cited to explain the general rule that failure to meet suitability criteria leads to exclusion from the procedure, which is the subject of the appeal.
B.2018.124 · sg (Art. 12 Abs. 1 lit. a VöB)
Suspension of Public Procurement Award Pending Review of Qualification Criteria Compliance
This article is cited in the reasoning concerning the potential exclusion of the respondent for failing to meet qualification criteria.
B.2017.121 · sg (Art. 12 Abs. 1 VöB)
Public Procurement Challenge: Retroactive Price Adjustment Vitiates Award Decision
Mentioned in the reasoning regarding the authority's discretion to exclude an offer, but not cited in the dispositive.