841.1
EGÖB
CH-SG
CH-SG
Art. 4 Einführungsgesetz zur Interkantonalen Vereinbarung über das öffentliche Beschaffungswesen aus dem Jahr 2019 (EGöB) - Rechtsschutz ([Art. 52](https://www.gesetzessammlung.sg.ch/data/841.51/de/art52) Abs. 1 IVöB)
Art. 4 EGöB · Rechtsschutz ([Art. 52](https://www.gesetzessammlung.sg.ch/data/841.51/de/art52) Abs. 1 IVöB)
1. Die Beschwerde gegen Verfügungen der Auftraggeberin oder des Auftraggebers an das Verwaltungsgericht ist ab dem für das Einladungsverfahren massgebenden Auftragswert zulässig.
2. Soweit die IVöB keine Regelung enthält, finden die Bestimmungen des Gesetzes über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege vom 16. Mai 1965 ergänzend Anwendung.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (14)
B.2021.65 · sg (Art. 4 Abs. 1 EGöB)
Public Procurement Cancellation Due to Budget Overrun Upheld
Cited in the reasoning section as the legal basis for contractor liability for damages caused by an unlawful decision.
B.2021.65 · sg (Art. 4 Abs. 1 EGöB)
Public Procurement Cancellation Upheld Due to Excessive Bid Cost
Cited in section 4 as the basis for the scope of liability for damages in procurement law, although ultimately leading to the rejection of the claim.
B.2018.83 · sg (Art. 4 Abs. 1 EGöB)
Procurement Law Compliance Regarding Mandatory Site Inspection Scheduling
Cited in connection with Art. 17 Abs. 2 IVöB as the legal basis for granting the suspension of effect.
B.2012.119 · sg (Art. 4 Abs. 2 EGöB)
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Challenge and Contract Execution in Forestry Tractor Procurement
Cited as the basis for declaring the claim for damages inadmissible because it was not submitted with the appeal.
B.2012.119 · sg (Art. 4 Abs. 2 EGöB)
Forestry Tractor Contract Award Challenge Dismissed Due to Untimely Suspension Request and No Causal Illegality
This provision was cited to explain why the claim for damages was inadmissible because it was not submitted with the appeal.
B.2012.54 · sg (Art. 4 Abs. 1 EGöB)
Contract Award Challenge Dismissed: Discretion in Engineering Services Evaluation Upheld
Used to deny the claim for damages because the award decision was not found to be unlawful.
B.2012.54 · sg (Art. 4 Abs. 1 EGöB)
Municipal Contract Award Challenge Upheld on Bid Evaluation Discretion
Cited as the basis for denying the claim for damages because the award decision was not found to be unlawful.
B.2008.211.B.2008.2 · sg (Art. 4 Abs. 1 EGöB)
Improper Award Revocation and Damages in Public Procurement
The court used this article as the basis for ordering the State to pay damages to the appellant due to the unlawful act (the unlawful award which necessitated the process).
B.2008.211.B.2008.227 · sg (Art. 4 Abs. 1 EGöB)
Public Contract Award Revocation Due to Unspecified Criteria
Used to order the state to pay damages to the appellant due to the unlawful contract award.
B.2008.211.B.2008.2 · sg (Art. 4 Abs. 1 EGöB)
Procurement Revocation Over Improper Criteria and Re-Tendering with Damages
The state was ordered to pay damages to the appellant based on this provision due to the unlawful act.
B.2007.131 · sg (Art. 4 Abs. 1 EGöB)
Municipality Unlawfully Split Harbor Redesign Contracts to Circumvent Tendering
Used as the basis for holding the municipality liable for damages due to the illegal awarding of contracts.
B.2007.131 · sg (Art. 4 Abs. 1 EGöB)
Improper Splitting of Public Procurement Contracts for Harbor Redevelopment
Cited as the basis for holding the municipality liable for damages due to the awarding contracts in an illegal manner.
B.2007.131 · sg (Art. 4 Abs. 2 EGöB)
Improper Splitting of Public Procurement Contracts for Harbor Redevelopment
Cited in the reasoning concerning the requirement to submit a claim for damages together with the appeal.
B.2007.138 · sg (Art. 4 Abs. 1 EGöB)
Procurement Cancellation Due to Substantial Cost Overruns
Mentioned in the reasoning (Erwägung 2.4.9) concerning liability for damages due to unlawful decisions, though not explicitly cited in the final orders (dispositive) except implicitly as context for refusing compensation claims.