Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
735.1 ENTG CH-SG

Art. 5 Enteignungsgesetz (EntG) - Enteignungsgründe

II. Enteignung - 1. Enteignungsrecht
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (64 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 5 EntG · Enteignungsgründe

1. Die Enteignung ist zulässig für

a) Bau, Betrieb und Unterhalt sowie künftige Erweiterung öffentlicher oder überwiegend im öffentlichen Interesse liegender Werke;

b) Bezug, Transport und Lagerung von Bau- und Aushubmaterial, wenn es für öffentliche oder überwiegend im öffentlichen Interesse liegende Werke erforderlich ist;

c) Schaffung öffentlich zugänglicher See- und Flussufer als Erholungsgebiete;

d) Erhaltung von Gegenständen, die dem besonderen Schutz nach den Vorschriften über Natur- und Heimatschutz unterstehen;

e) Bau privater Anschlussgleise;

f) Massnahmen zur Walderhaltung oder die Erstellung von Bauten und Anlagen zum Schutz vor Naturereignissen.

← Art. 4 EntG Enteignungsgesetz (EntG) - Geltungsbereich Art. 6 EntG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (27)

B.2021.101 · sg (Art. 5 lit. a EntG)
Road Project Expropriation Partially Overturned Due to Insufficient Necessity for Bus Shelter Land
Cited as the legal basis for permitting expropriation for the construction of a public work, relevant to the partial success regarding expropriation.
B.2021.101 · sg (Art. 5 f. EntG)
Cantonal Road Project Expropriation Remanded for Proportionality and Shelter Justification
Substantive legal basis discussed in the reasoning regarding the admissibility of expropriation.
B.2020.114 · sg (Art. 5 lit. a EntG)
Road Widening Plan Appeal Dismissed
The legal basis for the expropriation was established by citing this provision, which allows expropriation for public or predominantly public interest works.
B.2020.114 · sg (Art. 5 lit. a EntG)
Municipal Road Expansion Approval Upheld Against Property Owner Appeal
Cited as part of the legal basis for allowing expropriation for public works.
19.4873 · sg (Art. 5 Bst. a EntG)
Appeal Regarding Water Connection for Property Outside Building Zone and Expropriation for Pipeline
Cited in the introductory summary as the standard for expropriation, the lack of which was used to justify the rejection of the appeal regarding the pipeline installation.
19.4873 · sg (Art. 5 Bst. a EntG)
Municipality Water Connection Denial Outside Building Zone
The court confirmed that the interest of the appellants in improved water supply for non-agricultural properties outside the building zone does not constitute the significant public interest required for expropriation under this article.
B.2020.183 · sg (Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a EntG)
Landfill Expropriation Upheld for Public Interest Waste Disposal
The court confirmed the existence of a valid ground for expropriation for a work predominantly in the public interest.
B.2020.183 · sg (Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a EntG)
Municipality Expropriation for Landfill Expansion Upheld
The court confirmed the expropriation was based on this provision because the landfill operation serves a purpose predominantly in the public interest.
B.2020.53 · sg (Art. 5 lit. a EntG)
Appeal on Road Project and Partial Road Plan Upheld Due to Planning Deficiencies
Cited in the reasoning explaining the conditions for expropriation, which was part of the initial dispute, although the final orders did not rule on the expropriation's legality.
B.2020.53 · sg (Art. 5 lit. a EntG)
Appeal Against Road Project Planning and Expropriation Annulled for Failure to Consider Inspection Report Findings
Cited in reasoning regarding the admissibility of expropriation for public works.
B.2019.76 · sg (Art. 5 lit. a EntG)
Cantonal Road Project Expropriation Upheld Over Minor Property Rights
The court confirmed the admissibility of the expropriation based on the law governing public works.
B.2019.76 · sg (Art. 5 lit. a EntG)
Road Redesign Expropriation Appeal Dismissal
The court confirmed the admissibility of the expropriation, which is based on this article regarding works in the public interest.
B.2017.240 · sg (Art. 5 lit. a EntG)
Appeal Against Road Construction and Property Appropriation Partially Granted Due to Insufficient Necessity Finding and Defective Traffic Safety Plan
Cited in the reasoning to confirm the existence of an expropriation ground (E. 3), but not explicitly in the dispositive orders.
B.2017.240 · sg (Art. 5 lit. a EntG)
Appeal Allowed: Insufficient Necessity for Expropriation and Unlawful Planting Restriction
Acknowledged as a valid ground for expropriation in the reasoning, but the need (Erforderlichkeit) for the specific measure was not confirmed.
B.2017.113 · sg (Art. 5 lit. a EntG SG)
Expropriation for Roundabout Upheld Despite Loss of Parking Space
Cited indirectly as part of the context in the analysis (E. 3) confirming the existence of a ground for expropriation.