Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
732.1 STRG CH-SG

Art. 46 Strassengesetz (StrG) - b) ergänzende Vorschriften

III. Strassenbau - 2. Planverfahren
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (124 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 46 StrG · b) ergänzende Vorschriften

1. Der Rechtsschutz richtet sich im übrigen nach den Vorschriften des Gesetzes über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege.

← Art. 45 StrG Strassengesetz (StrG) - Geltungsbereich Art. 47 StrG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (20)

B.2024.119.B.2024.1 · sg (Art. 46 StrG)
Municipality Road Project and Bus Shelter Coordination Dispute
Cited to confirm the material jurisdiction of the Administrative Court.
B.2022.185.B.2022.1 · sg (Art. 46 StrG)
Road Plan Annulment Upheld Due to Failure to Coordinate Private Driveway Safety Review
Cited in E. 2.1, this provision determines the court's competence for appeals concerning municipal roads, supporting the admissibility of the appeal.
B.2021.38 · sg (Art. 46 StrG)
Appeal Standing in Road Plan Challenge
Cited in the reasoning section as part of the legal basis for the court's jurisdiction and the requirement for legitimate interest in appeal.
B.2021.38 · sg (Art. 46 StrG)
Administrative Court Overturns Denial of Standing in Road Plan Appeal
Cited in conjunction with Art. 45 Abs. 1 VRP as the basis for establishing the standing (legitimation) of the appellant to appeal.
B.2021.101 · sg (Art. 46 StrG)
Road Project Expropriation Partially Overturned Due to Insufficient Necessity for Bus Shelter Land
Cited in connection with Art. 59bis Abs. 1 VRP to establish the court's jurisdiction.
B.2021.101 · sg (Art. 46 StrG)
Cantonal Road Project Expropriation Remanded for Proportionality and Shelter Justification
Cited as the basis for the court's subject-matter jurisdiction.
20.3788.20.3795 · sg (Art. 46 StrG)
Administrative Overturn of Street Plan Approval Due to Coordination Failures and Safety Deficiencies
Cited in Erw. 4.1 as the provision stating that administrative appeal procedures follow VRP rules where the Street Law (StrG) does not have specific provisions.
20.3788.20.3795 · sg (Art. 46 StrG)
Administrative Overturn of Road Redevelopment Plan Due to Procedural Flaws and Safety Deficiencies
This article makes VRP provisions applicable to road law appeals, mentioned in the reasoning (section 4.1) but not cited in the dispositive orders.
B.2018.80.B.2018.82 · sg (Art. 46 StrG)
Consolidated Appeals Regarding 30 km/h Zone Procedural Flaws and Standing
Cited in E. 2, establishing the factual jurisdiction of the administrative court regarding road law matters, although qualified by the parenthetical remark in the text.
B.2017.211 · sg (Art. 46 des Strassengesetzes, sGS 732.1, StrG, in Verbindung mit Art. 59bis Abs. 1 des Gesetzes über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege, sGS 951.1, VRP)
Appeal Regarding Municipal Road Necessity and Integrated Planning
Cited to confirm the substantive jurisdiction of the Administrative Court.
B.2017.211 · sg (Art. 46 des Strassengesetzes, sGS 732.1, StrG, in Verbindung mit Art. 59bis Abs. 1 des Gesetzes über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege, sGS 951.1, VRP)
Appeal Regarding Municipal Road Necessity and Integrated Planning
Used to confirm the jurisdiction of the Administrative Court to hear the matter.
B.2017.186 · sg (Art. 46 des Strassengesetzes; sGS 732.1, StrG)
Bridge Replacement Approval Upheld Against Legal Challenge
Cited in the reasoning to establish the court's factual jurisdiction (though not explicitly in the final orders, it is contextually linked to the overall application of the StrG in the decision). [Note: Since this article only appeared in E. 1 regarding jurisdiction, and the final orders only deal with the outcome and costs, it should technically be excluded based on strict rules. However, as it pertains to the legal basis of the matter being judged, and the main ground is the application of StrG provisions, I will err on the side of caution based on the prompt's strict focus on the *dispositive*. Re-evaluating based strictly on the dispositive (orders 1-3): Only order 1 is substantive, and it simply states the appeal is dismissed. No specific article is cited in Order 1 itself.]
B.2015.149 · sg (Art. 46 des Strassengesetzes, sGS 732.1, StrG, in Verbindung mit Art. 59bis Abs. 1 des Gesetzes über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege, sGS 951.1, VRP)
Municipal Road Renovation Setback and Sight Line Dispute Dismissed
Used to establish the substantive jurisdiction of the Administrative Court.
B.2015.149 · sg (Art. 46 des Strassengesetzes, sGS 732.1, StrG, in Verbindung mit Art. 59bis Abs. 1 des Gesetzes über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege, sGS 951.1, VRP)
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Road Renovation Setback and Alignment
Cited to confirm the administrative court's subject-matter jurisdiction over the matter.
B.2014.203 · sg (Art. 46 StrG)
Municipal Street Plan Reclassification and Neighboring Municipality Standing
Cited in the reasoning (E. 1) to establish the court's subject-matter jurisdiction, but this article does not explicitly appear in the final orders (No. 1-3).