731.1
PBG
CH-SG
CH-SG
Art. 99 Planungs- und Baugesetz (PBG) - Grundsatz
B. Nutzungs- und Bauvorschriften - II. Erstellung von Bauten und Anlagen - 7. Einordnung und Gestaltung
Art. 99 PBG · Grundsatz
1. Die Erstellung von Bauten und Anlagen, die das Orts- oder Landschaftsbild verunstalten oder Baudenkmäler beeinträchtigen, ist untersagt.
2. Die politische Gemeinde kann für Kern- und Schutzzonen sowie für weitere konkret bezeichnete Gebiete vorschreiben, dass Bauten und Anlagen so gestaltet und eingeordnet werden, dass mit der Umgebung zusammen eine gute Gesamtwirkung entsteht.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (48)
B.2023.124 · sg (Art. 99 Abs. 1 PBG)
Appeal Against Building Permit in Protected Cityscape Area Dismissed
Cited in the reasoning section which concludes that the construction does not constitute disfigurement, supporting the dismissal of the appeal.
23.2974 · sg (Art. 99 PBG)
Building Permit Appeal Regarding Multi-Family Housing, Garage Gradient
Cited in the reasoning regarding the prohibition against disfigurement, but the finding was that the project did not violate it.
B.2023.97 · sg (Art. 99 Abs. 1 PBG)
Mast Height Aesthetics Appeal Dismissed
This provision, concerning the prohibition against marring the appearance of the locality or landscape, was the main substantive ground used to dismiss the appeal regarding landscape preservation concerns.
B.2023.97 · sg (Art. 99 Abs. 1 PBG)
Mobile Communication Mast Permit Upheld Against Disfigurement Claim
The main ground for the decision, relating to the assessment of the public law requirement regarding the impact on the local and landscape image (Verunstaltungsverbot).
22.4729 · sg (Art. 99 PBG)
Appeal Dismissed: Mobile Antenna Building Permit Upheld
Cited in the reasoning to discuss the prohibition against spoiling the site or landscape, but not explicitly in the final orders.
22.9334 · sg (Art. 99 Abs. 1 PBG)
Appeal Against Building Permit for Renovation Dismissed Due to Lack of Monument Status
The appeal was dismissed because the planned construction did not violate the prohibition of disfigurement according to this article.
22.1241 · sg (Art. 99 Abs. 1 PBG)
Invalid Building Permit and Construction Violations Appeal
Cited in the reasoning regarding the general prohibition of disfigurement.
22.1456 · sg (Art. 99 PBG)
Appeal Against Mobile Phone Antenna Permit Dismissed
Cited in the reasoning regarding the prohibition of spoiling the landscape/townscape, relevant context for dismissing the appeal concerning visual impact.
22.7087 · sg (Art. 99 PBG)
Appeal Dismissed: Cellular Antenna Permit Zoning Compliance Confirmed
This provision regulates the prohibition of unsightly buildings and structures, cited in the reasoning regarding the appeal's challenge against the aesthetic impact.
B.2022.181 · sg (Art. 99 PBG)
Appeal Against Building Permit Dismissed Due to Compliance with Public Law Norms
Cited in the reasoning to discuss the prohibition against spoiling the character of the location or landscape.
B.2022.181 · sg (Art. 99 PBG)
Appeal Against Building Permit Approval Dismissed Due to Compliance with Public Law Norms
The court addressed the claim regarding the disfigurement of the local and landscape appearance, finding no violation of Art. 99 PBG.
22.7736.22.7752 · sg (Art. 99 Abs. 1 PBG)
Building Permit Appeal Regarding Protected Villa and Loggia Insulation
Cited in the reasoning that confirms the protection status of the Villa N.___ applies by law, justifying the dismissal of the appeal regarding neighborhood protection.
B.2022.40 · sg (Art. 99 Abs. 1 PBG)
Special Use Plan Approval Upheld Despite Tree Removal and Zoning Deviations near Cultural Monument
This article concerning the protection of cultural monuments was cited in the reasoning that led to the conclusion that the cultural monument would not be impaired.
22.5015 · sg (Art. 99 Abs. 1 PBG)
Appeal Success Over Invalid Local Aesthetics Regulation in Photovoltaic Permit Denial
The decision relies on this article to determine whether the planned photovoltaic system causes disfigurement after finding that the local aesthetic regulation (Art. 5 BauR) is inapplicable.
22.5015 · sg (Art. 99 Abs. 2 PBG)
Appeal Success Over Invalid Local Aesthetics Regulation in Photovoltaic Permit Denial
Cited in the reasoning as the standard against which local aesthetic provisions (Art. 5 BauR) were measured and found to be invalid due to lack of territorial limitation.