Art. 138 Planungs- und Baugesetz (PBG) - Ordentliches Verfahren a) Visierung

22.4729 · sg (Art. 138 PBG)

Appeal Dismissed: Mobile Antenna Building Permit Upheld

Cited in the reasoning regarding the obligation to put up visual markers, but not explicitly in the final orders.

B.2022.182 · sg (Art. 138 ff. PBG)

Day Care Noise Complaint Remand Upheld Against Bias Claim

Cited in the reasoning regarding the possibility of imposing measures in a building permit procedure (though not explicitly cited in the final orders).

22.7087 · sg (Art. 138 PBG)

Appeal Dismissed: Cellular Antenna Permit Zoning Compliance Confirmed

Cited in the reasoning concerning the requirements for setting up visibility markers (Visieren).

B.2022.181 · sg (Art. 138 PBG)

Appeal Against Building Permit Dismissed Due to Compliance with Public Law Norms

Cited in the reasoning to discuss the requirement for setting up sight markers (Visierungspflicht) in the building permit procedure.

B.2022.181 · sg (Art. 138 PBG)

Appeal Against Building Permit Approval Dismissed Due to Compliance with Public Law Norms

The court reviewed and rejected the appellant's claims regarding the requirement for site marking (Visierungspflicht) under Art. 138 PBG.

22.2539 · sg (Art. 138 f. PBG)

Appeal on Building Permit for Retail Shop Conversion in Protected Townscape

The appeal was granted because the administrative authority should have conducted the ordinary procedure according to this provision.

22.4179.22.4180 · sg (Art. 138 PBG)

Building Permit Appeal Regarding Visibility Markers and Fence Material

The court addressed the appellants' complaint regarding incorrect site visibility, which is governed by this article.

B.2020.171 · sg (Art. 138 f. PBG)

Building Permit Objection Period Lapse Upheld Despite Procedural Flaws

Cited in the reasoning concerning the requirements of the ordinary building permit procedure.

20.1995 · sg (Art. 138 f. PBG)

Appeal Regarding Dismissal of Late Objection to Building Permit Based on Procedural Defects

Cited in the summary reasoning (headnote) as the relevant procedure for the main case (ordinary procedure), but the final order relies on procedural breach (untimeliness) rather than a ruling on the merits under these articles.

20.1995 · sg (Art. 138 f. PBG)

Administrative Appeal Regarding Timeliness of Objection to Building Permit for Bistro Expansion

The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to appeal timely, even though the court found that the procedure followed by the lower authority respected the rules of the ordinary procedure (Art. 138 ff. PBG) applicable to the case.

19.3654 · sg (Art. 138 f. PBG)

Retroactive Permit Overturned for Lack of Public Notice and Hearing

The case was remanded to the lower authority to conduct the decision-making process according to the ordinary building permit procedure outlined in this article.

19.3654 · sg (Art. 138 PBG)

Appeal Allowed Due to Improper Permit Procedure and Violation of Right to be Heard in Protected Tree Zone

The case was remanded for a new decision following the ordinary building permit procedure according to this provision.

18.6942 · sg (Art. 138 f. PBG)

Building Permit Rejection and Failure to Rule on Private Law Objections

Mentioned in the reasoning regarding the orderly handling of the building permit procedure.