731.1 PBG

CH-SG

Art. 122 Planungs- und Baugesetz (PBG) - b) Eigentumsbeschränkungen

C. Natur- und Heimatschutz - II. Baudenkmäler und archäologische Denkmäler

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (170 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 122 PBG · b) Eigentumsbeschränkungen

1. Der Entscheid über die Unterschutzstellung legt Eigentumsbeschränkungen fest.

2. Grundeigentümerinnen oder Grundeigentümer können unter Schutz gestellte Objekte einschliesslich deren Umgebung unter Wahrung des Schutzziels für zeitgemässe Bedürfnisse umnutzen und entsprechend anpassen.

3. Unter Schutz gestellte Objekte dürfen nur beseitigt oder beeinträchtigt werden, wenn ein gewichtiges, das Interesse an der Erhaltung überwiegendes Bedürfnis nachgewiesen wird.

4. Die zuständige Stelle der politischen Gemeinde bezieht die zuständige kantonale Stelle bei Entscheiden nach Abs. 3 dieser Bestimmung rechtzeitig in das Verfahren ein, wenn Objekte von nationaler oder kantonaler Bedeutung betroffen sind. Sie eröffnet der zuständigen kantonalen Stelle ihre entsprechenden Entscheide.

← Art. 121 PBG Planungs- und Baugesetz (PBG) - Ortsplanung Art. 123 PBG →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (18)

23.717 · sg (Art. 122 Abs. 3 PBG)

Appeal Dismissed: Unauthorized Tree Felling in Scenery Protection Area

This provision establishes the permit requirement for altering protected objects, justifying the order to submit a building application.

22.6740 · sg (Art. 122 Abs. 4 PBG)

Appeal Against Synthetic Ice Rink Permit Granted Due to Environmental Assessment Deficiencies

This provision concerning the inclusion of the Cantonal Office for Culture was cited in the headnote as a ground for the appeal's success, relating to cultural heritage protection.

22.1196 · sg (Art. 122 Abs. 3 PBG)

Appeal Against Roof Terrace Permit Dismissed Due to Acceptable Impact on Protected Cityscape

This provision sets the standard for allowing impairment of protected objects (requiring a weighty interest prevailing over preservation), which the court considered when finding the construction project permissible regarding protected objects.

22.7736.22.7752 · sg (Art. 122 Abs. 3 PBG)

Building Permit Appeal Regarding Protected Villa and Loggia Insulation

Cited in the reasoning that confirms the protection status of the Villa N.___ applies by law, justifying the dismissal of the appeal regarding formal heritage approval.

21.921 · sg (Art. 122 Abs. 3 PBG)

Building Permit Challenge Dismissed After Curing Procedural Defect on Appeal

The provision establishing the criteria under which a protected object may be removed or affected (weighty interest outweighing preservation) was applied to uphold the demolition/new construction.

20.10049.20.10053 · sg (Art. 122 Abs. 3 PBG)

Oak Tree Felling Permit Denial and Habitat Protection Appeal

Cited in the context of when a felling permit can be granted if the tree is protected, requiring an interest assessment that favors felling.

21.4653 · sg (Art. 122 PBG)

Administrative Appeal Regarding Plastic Window Installation in Protected Cityscape

Cited in the overall context of protecting classified objects, which underpins the denial of permission and the restoration order.

B.2021.34 · sg (Art. 122 Abs. 3 PBG)

Appeal Dismissed: ISOS Applicability in Building Permit for Demolition and Construction

Cited in the reasoning regarding the conditions under which listed objects may be removed or impaired, which is part of the court's substantive analysis.

B.2021.34 · sg (Art. 122 Abs. 3 PBG)

Building Permit Upheld Despite ISOS Appeal

Cited in the reasoning (E. 7.2) concerning the conditions under which protected objects may be removed or impaired, forming part of the basis for rejecting the appeal concerning heritage protection.

20.10157 · sg (Art. 122 Abs. 3 PBG)

Appeal Against Building Permit Due to Excessive Volume and Insufficient Setbacks

This provision relates to the required consent from the cantonal monument protection authority, which was implicitly addressed in the appeal's merits regarding the interpretation of the authority's correspondence.

20.6983.20.7007 · sg (Art. 122 Abs. 3 PBG)

Appeal Regarding Building Permit Revoked Due to Procedural Violation and Lack of Justification

Cited in the text section summarizing the rule that assessing impairment of a protected monument presupposes formal protection, directly relevant to the annulment decision regarding Villa N.___.

20.4346 · sg (Art. 122 Abs. 3 PBG)

Appeal Dismissed Due to Lack of Required Cultural Heritage Consent for Mobile Tower

Cited as the primary basis for the finding that the appeal could not be entertained due to the lack of necessary approval from the cantonal authority.

20.4346 · sg (Art. 122 Abs. 3 PBG)

Appeal Dismissed Due to Lack of Mandatory Cantonal Cultural Heritage Approval

Cited as the basis for the necessity of prior approval from the cantonal authority, the lack of which prevented the appeal from being heard.

18.7222.18.7323 · sg (Art. 122 Abs. 3 PBG)

Appeal Authority Overturns Permits Due to Insufficient Road Access and Incomplete Application

Mentioned regarding the requirement for approval from the heritage conservation authority ('DMP') in certain cases.

19.4314 · sg (Art. 122 Abs. 3 PBG)

Building Permit Appeal Dismissed over Procedural and Material Objections

Cited in the introductory summary, although the decision clarifies that the DMP's statement itself is not a partial decision under this article, the article frames the discussion about the DMP's role which is relevant to the overall decision context.