Art. 16 Sozialhilfegesetz (SHG) - Auskunfts- und Meldepflicht a) hilfesuchende Person

DIGS411.666 · sg (Art. 16 Abs. 2 SHG)

Appeal Regarding Cessation of Social Assistance Due to Excluded Care Costs

Cited as the basis for the finding that the reporting obligation in Dispositivziffer 3 of the original decision was unlawful, leading to its cancellation.

DIGS411.465 · sg (Art. 16 SHG)

Social Assistance Discontinuation and Misuse of Funds Appeal

This article, concerning the duty to cooperate (disclosure and notification), justifies the finding that the failure to prove need rendered the initial discontinuation lawful, as part of the legal basis for the decision upheld in order 1.a.

B.2020.238 · sg (Art. 16 Abs. 2 SHG)

Social Assistance Recipient Penalty Reduction for Conditional Violations

The breach of the duty to report income/circumstances (related to the disability certificate) was cited as a basis for the initial reduction.

B.2015.292 · sg (Art. 16 Abs. 2 SHG)

Reduction of Social Assistance Benefits for Failure to Report Income and Possessing Railway Pass

This provision establishes the duty to report facts that change entitlement or calculation, the violation of which was established as a ground for reduction.

B.2015.292 · sg (Art. 16 Abs. 2 SHG)

Reduction of Social Assistance Benefits for Failure to Report Settlement and Possessing Transport Pass

The violation of the duty to report facts (Art. 16 Abs. 2 SHG) was established as the basis for applying the sanction under Art. 17 lit. a SHG.

B.2013.34 · sg (Art. 16 Abs. 1 und 17 lit. b SHG)

Appeal for Retroactive Social Assistance Dismissed

These articles concerning information and participation duties were cited in the summary of the legal issue addressed by the decision, although the final orders do not explicitly repeat them as the main ground for the final ruling.

B.2013.34 · sg (Art. 16 Abs. 1 und 17 lit. b SHG)

Appeal Dismissed for Retroactive Social Assistance Benefits Due to Existing Support and Prospectless Legal Aid Request

These provisions regarding the duty to provide information and cooperation are mentioned in the subject description, indicating they form the basis of the dispute concerning the denied benefits, even if the final ruling relies on the lack of proven need for the past period (Erwägung 2.3).

B.2005.147 · sg (Art. 16 SHG)

Social Assistance Recipient Income Declaration Dispute and Benefit Cessation Validity

The court addressed the violation of the applicant's duty to cooperate (Mitwirkungspflichten) by confirming the previous reduction, which stems from this provision.

B.2004.137 · sg (Art. 16 SHG)

Social Assistance Supplements Denial Upheld for Institutionalized Adult Son; Spousal Employment and Disability Claim Requirements Upheld

Cited in the reasoning while discussing the general obligations of benefit recipients, but not explicitly used in the final orders (dispositive).

B.2004.137 · sg (Art. 16 Abs. 1 SHG)

Social Assistance Recipient Obligations and Coverage Limits

Cited in the reasoning section when discussing the duties of persons applying for social assistance, although not directly in the final orders.