125.1
RIG
CH-SG
CH-SG
Art. 36 Gesetz über Referendum und Initiative (RIG) - Verfahren
DRITTER TEIL: INITIATIVE IN KANTONALEN ANGELEGENHEITEN - A. Gesetzesinitiative - 2. Zulässigkeit
Art. 36 RIG · Verfahren
1. Das Initiativkomitee legt der Regierung den Wortlaut des Initiativbegehrens samt allfälliger Begründung und die Mitgliederliste schriftlich vor.
2. Die Regierung entscheidet innert drei Monaten über die Zulässigkeit des Initiativbegehrens. Sie kann diese von Bedingungen abhängig machen.
3. Das Initiativbegehren ist zulässig, wenn
a) es rechtmässig ist;
b)* die Voraussetzungen nach Art. 34 und 35 dieses Gesetzes erfüllt sind.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (8)
B.2014.196 · sg (Art. 44 Abs. 2 KV in Verbindung mit Art. 36 Abs. 3 RIG analog)
Popular Initiative for Green Belt Protection Admissibility
This is the main legal basis cited in conjunction with other provisions to assess the inadmissibility of the popular initiative.
B.2014.196 · sg (Art. 36 Abs. 3 RIG analog)
Municipal Initiative on Green Ring Protection Admissibility
Cited in conjunction with other provisions as the basis for declaring the initiative admissible by reviewing potential violations of higher law (inadmissibility criteria).
B.2014.216 · sg (Art. 36 Abs. 2 RIG)
Initiative Limiting Primary School Foreign Languages Ruled Inadmissible Due to Conflict with Higher Law
Procedural basis for the Government's decision on the admissibility of the initiative request, which the appeal challenged.
B.2014.216 · sg (Art. 36 Abs. 3 RIG)
Popular Initiative on Foreign Language Limits Inadmissible Due to Conflict with Higher Law
Cited in conjunction with Art. 44 Abs. 2 Ingress und lit. b KV regarding inadmissibility due to conflict with superior law.
B.2012.229 · sg (Art. 36 Abs. 3 RIG)
Inadmissibility of Cantonal Initiative for Federal Advocacy
Cited alongside Art. 44 Abs. 2 lit. b KV to confirm the inadmissibility of the initiative due to lack of feasibility.
B.2012.229 · sg (Art. 36 Abs. 3 RIG)
Cantonal Initiative for Federal Animal Product Ban Inadmissible Due to Lack of Feasibility
This procedural rule was cited in conjunction with Art. 44 Abs. 2 lit. b KV as the basis for dismissing the appeal due to inadmissibility.
B.2008.38 · sg (Art. 36 RIG)
Administrative Court Upholds Invalidity of Absolute Equality Initiative Due to Balancing Requirement
This provision on the Referendum and Initiative Act is cited as the basis for declaring the initiative inadmissible because it conflicts with overriding law.
B.2008.38 · sg (Art. 36 RIG)
Initiative Invalidated Due to Conflict with Religious Freedom and Equality Principles
Cited in the introductory summary as the basis for the subject matter (initiative regulation) and used to confirm the government's right to declare the initiative invalid due to conflict with superior law.