130.1
STVG
CH-OW
Art. 67 Staatsverwaltungsgesetz (StVG) - Weiterziehbarkeit und Berechtigung
Verwaltungsverfahren und Verwaltungsbeschwerdeverfahren - Verwaltungsbeschwerdeverfahren
Art. 67 StVG · Weiterziehbarkeit und Berechtigung
1. Sofern die Gesetzgebung nicht etwas anderes bestimmt, kann gegen Verfügungen der Amtsstellen beim Departement, gegen Verfügungen und Entscheide des Departementes oder von Kommissionen beim Regierungsrat innert 20 Tagen Beschwerde erhoben werden.
2. Rechtsverweigerung, Rechtsverzögerung und Vor- und Zwischenentscheide sind nach Massgabe des Gesetzes über die Gerichtsorganisation selbstständig anfechtbar. Im Übrigen sind sie nur mit dem Endentscheid anfechtbar.
3. Zur Beschwerde ist berechtigt
a. wer durch die angefochtene Verfügung berührt ist und ein schutzwürdiges Interesse an deren Aufhebung oder Änderung hat;
b. jede andere Person, Organisation oder Behörde, die durch die Gesetzgebung dazu ermächtigt ist.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (14)
VVGE.1999.00.Nr.29 · ow (Art. 67 Abs. 3 StVG)
Property Owner Standing and Validity of Older Expert Reports for Speed Limits
This article is cited to establish the standing of the plaintiff as a property owner to challenge traffic restrictions, asserting they are more affected than the general public.
VVGE.1999.00.Nr.8 · ow (Art. 67 Abs. 1 StVG)
Teacher Salary Determination Appeal Upheld
Used to establish the jurisdiction of the Regierungsrat to hear the appeal against the decision of a department.
VVGE.2003.04.Nr.19 · ow (Art. 67 Abs. 3 StVG)
Mobile Antenna Zoning Conformity and Radiation Limits Appeal
Basis for determining the legitimacy of appeals against mobile communication systems.
OGVE.2016.17.56.htm · ow (Art. 67 Abs. 1 StVG)
Case of Un-Rejected French Complaint
Cited regarding the language in which complaints must be submitted.
OGVE.2016.17.17.htm · ow (Art. 128 Abs. 4 BiG i.V.m. Art. 67 Abs. 3 lit. a StVG)
Vocational trainee's appeal of grade for honorary mention dismissed for lack of standing
Cited as the basis for assessing whether factual interests can be asserted in addition to legal interests for the purpose of the admissibility of an appeal.
VVGE.1999.00.Anhang.I · ow (Art. 67 Abs. 1 StVG)
Cantonal Employment Law Dismissal Procedures and Compensation
Defines the appeal route for decisions concerning the termination of employment.
VVGE.1999.00.Anhang · ow (Art. 67 Abs. 1 StVG)
Public Employee Dismissals Under Cantonal Law
Cited as the basis for the legal remedies available against a dismissal.
VVGE.1999.00.Nr.4 · ow (Art. 67 Abs. 3 StVG)
Father Lacks Standing to Appeal Child Support Advancement
Cited as the legal basis for determining who is entitled to appeal a decision and establishing the requirement of being affected by the decision and having a legitimate interest in its annulment or modification.
VVGE.2005.06.Nr.10 · ow (Art. 67 Abs. 3 Bst. a StVG)
Father Lacks Standing to Appeal Daughter's Residence Permit Refusal
The father is not entitled to appeal the refusal to extend his adult daughter's residence permit.
VVGE.2005.06.Nr.12 · ow (Art. 67 Abs. 1 StVG)
Surname Change Denied Due to Lack of "Important Reasons"
This provision establishes the right to appeal departmental decisions to the Regierungsrat within 20 days, and the court's decision to proceed with the appeal is based on its applicability.
VVGE.2005.06.Nr.9 · ow (Art. 67 Abs. 2 StVG)
Court Vacates Building Permit Stay, Denies Recusal, Awards Compensation for Procedural Error
Basis for declaring the appeal against the interim decision on suspension admissible due to irreparable harm.
VVGE.2007.08.Nr.11 · ow (Art. 67 Abs. 3 Bst. a StVG)
Pedestrian Crossing Standing and Traffic Impact
This provision was used to determine the petitioner's standing to appeal.
VVGE.2011.13.Nr.39 · ow (Art. 67 Abs. 1 StVG)
Appeal Against Ordinance Dismissed
Cited to explain that appeals are generally only possible against decisions (Verfügungen), not abstract norms.
OGVE.2014.15.62.htm · ow (Art. 67 Abs. 3 Bst. a StVG)
Standing to Modify Spring Water Permit Requires New Application
This provision was used to determine that the appellant lacked a legally protected interest to appeal the decision regarding the water extraction limit.